| Title |
A Study on Construction Evaluation Criteria for Securing the Objectivity in Public Construction |
| Authors |
서세덕(Seo, Se Deok) ; 김옥규(Kim, Ok Kyue) ; 박형근(Park, Hyung Keun) |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2019.39.6.0913 |
| Keywords |
시공평가;개선항목;종합심사낙찰제 Construction evaluation;Improvement item;Fleiss kappa;Comprehensive evaluation bidding system |
| Abstract |
The government introduced the comprehensive evaluation bidding system with the goal of pursuing the best value and the global standard in 2016. However, for the evaluation criteria on the construction evaluation reflected to the comprehensive evaluation bidding system, the problems of the objectivity insufficiency, the inclusion of multiple subjective evaluation items, and the irrationality of the weight for each evaluation item are continue to be presented. The central office group, the local government, the relevant industry, and the expert group share recognition, but the solution is not derived. Hence, the major evaluation items to be improved were derived with the characteristics analyzed to secure the objectivity of the construction evaluation. For the analysis method, the standard deviation and the Fleiss Kappa analysis method were used by utilizing the characteristics that the construction evaluation criteria consist of all 4-point measures (good, average, insufficient, and poor). According to the result, the 10 evaluation items of the total 25 construction evaluation items were derived as the evaluation items to be improved. It was found in the analysis on the major characteristics of the derived evaluation items that the qualitative evaluation criteria such as 'Very Suitable' and 'Suitable' were commonly included in the detailed evaluation guidelines. Hence, as far as the future construction evaluation standards are concerned, the qualitative evaluation standards are sublated, and the improvement should be made mainly for the quantitative evaluation criteria enabling the objectivity assurance. |