배효관
(Hyokwan Bae)
1iD
TanusreePaul
(Tanusree Paul)
2iD
정진영
(Jin-Young Jung)
3†iD
-
부산대학교 사회환경시스템공학과
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pusan National University)
-
PRA Health Sciences
(PRA Health Sciences, Mannheim, Germany)
-
영남대학교 환경공학과
(Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University)
© Korean Society on Water Quality. All rights reserved.
Key words(Korean)
Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, Anaerobic ammonium oxidation, Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, Sequencing, Real-time qPCR
1. Introduction
Complete removal of nitrogen is extremely important in wastewater treatment because
this nitrogen contributes to the eutrophication of receiving waters. Moreover, the
toxicity of NH4+ and NO2- has a direct threat to aquatic life. The conventional nitrogen removal process consists
of two main processes: nitrification and denitrification. Nitrification is carried
out sequentially by aerobic chemolithoautotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB)
and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB). Previously, oxidation of NH4+ and NO2- by chemolithoautotrophic nitrifiers was thought to be restricted to oxic environments.
The discovery of a novel pathway for anaerobic ammonium oxidation (AMX) by Planctomyces
provided the opportunity to develop AMX into a novel nitrogen-removal process. AMX
is an anoxic microbiological process in which NH4+ and NO2- are converted to dinitrogen gas by reaction (1) (Strous et al., 1998).
In the early 1990s, the first direct evidence of the anaerobic oxidation of NH4+ has been discovered at Gist-Brocades (Delft, The Netherlands) and it was noted that
NH4+ disappeared from the reactor effluent by the production of nitrate with a concurrent
increase in dinitrogen gas production on a denitrifying pilot plant (Jetten et al., 1998). The first discovered AMX bacterium was named Candidatus Brocadia anammoxidans, which belongs to the Planctomyces. Many scientists also discovered other AMX bacteria from wastewater treatment plants
and marine environments and to date three genera have been described: Brocadia, Kuenenia
and Scalindua (Dalsgaard et al., 2005). In AMX bioreactors, the AMX reaction must be supplied with NO2- which could be provided by oxidation of NH4+ to NO2- by AOB. AOB are responsible for the first step in nitrification and most of them
are the species of β-subdivision of the class Proteobacteria.
Most of the physiological and kinetic data available for AOB have been based on a
small group of cultured isolates. However, AOB are slow-growing and difficult to isolate
in pure culture. In addition, cultured isolates may not represent the dominant AOB
in the environment (Purkhold et al., 2000; Rowan et al., 2003). These limitations can be remedied using molecular techniques, which allow a more
complete understanding of the diversity and distribution of AOB in natural environments
than is offered by cultivation-based methods alone. Especially, real-time qPCR with
sets of group-specific primers and probes provides a powerful approach to study the
population dynamics of AOB. The quantitative analysis of AOB provides valuable knowledge
on the relationship between the AOB and coexisting bacteria which share common substrates.
For example, real-time qPCR revealed that the complex microbial communities of AOB,
NOB and archaea for biological wastewater treatment are dynamically shifted according
to the environmental conditions (Abzazou et al., 2018).
The diverse interaction of AOB with coexisting bacteria has been reported for sea
and soil (Li et al., 2017; Nitahara et al., 2017). Under the oxygen-limited conditions, clusters of AMX bacteria are often found with
clusters of AOB, which convert NH4+ into NO2- and consume the inhibitory oxygen (Sliekers et al., 2002; Third et al., 2001). AOB can also coexist with AMX bacteria under anaerobic conditions (Qiao et al., 2009; Quan et al., 2008). However, the relationship between AMX activity and the quantity of AOB is not known.
In this research, the objectives were to identify and quantify AOB in an AMX enrichment
bioreactor during the start-up and substrate inhibition periods using molecular biological
techniques. The qualitative and quantitative approaches revealed the close relationship
between AOB and AMX bacteria in the dynamic conditions of the common substrate, i.e.,
NH4+, in an AMX reactor.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Enrichment of AMX bacteria
A sequencing batch reactor for anaerobic ammonium oxidation (AMX-SBR) with a working
volume of 2.5 L was operated for approximately five months (i.e., 159 days). The SBR
was seeded with activated sludge; the initial biomass concentration was 1.13 g VSS/L.
Temperature was maintained at 35 °C and the agitation speed was 75 rpm. To remove
the dissolved oxygen completely the medium was purged with argon gas before and after
being added to the SBR. The reaction was carried for 7 days for each cycle (Anjali and Sabumon, 2017). The ratio of NH4+- to NO2--nitrogen was approximately 1:1. The compositions of the enrichment medium are described
in the previous study (Bae et al., 2010). The substrate nitrogen (SN) concentration, which is the sum of NH4+- and NO2--nitrogen, was controlled to reveal the maximum substrate loading which is tolerable
for the AMX-SBR.
2.2. T-RFLP and sequencing
Nine samples were collected for Days 28, 56, 77, 101, 108, 115, 124, 127 and 153.
To investigate the microbial community structure of AOB in the AMX-SBR, real-time
qPCR, T-RFLP, and sequencing were conducted. To isolate DNA, samples of homogenous
activated-sludge were obtained from the SBR. A Power Soil™ DNA kit (Mo Bio Laboratories,
US) was used to isolate the DNA following the manufacturer’s protocol. For the amplification
of the bacterial ammonia monooxygenase subunit A (amoA) gene for cloning and T-RFLP, primers amoA-1F (5’-GGGGTTTCTACTGGTGGT-3’) and amoA-2R (5’-CCCCTCKGSAAAG CCTTCTTC-3’) were used. For T-RFLP, the forward primer amoA-1F and reverse primer amoA-2R were labeled with fluorophores, FAM and HEX, respectively (Park and Noguera, 2004). The PCR mixture consisted of 15 μl of 2× PCR pre-Mix (SolGent, Korea), 1 μL of
each primer (10 μM), 1 μL of DNA template, and 12 μL of deionized water. The PCR cycles
were as follows: 1 cycle of 2 min at 95°C, 30 cycles of 20 s at 95°C, 40 s at 57°C,
40 s at 72°C then 1 cycle of 5 min at 72°C. Cycles were performed using a MyCycler™
Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD, USA). The amplified amoA gene was cloned in a pGEM®-T Easy Vector System (Promega, USA). The ligation mixture was transformed into HIT™
competent cells (Real Biotech Corp., Taiwan). Plasmids containing amoA gene inserts were sequenced by SolGent Co. (Korea). Forty-seven amoA partial sequences obtained and Phylogenetic analysis was used to determine relationships
among the sequences. Sequences were aligned using the ClustalX 1.81 program. Clones
with more than 97% sequence similarity were grouped into the same operational taxonomic
unit (OTU). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ)
method. The reliability of internal branches was assessed using 1,000 bootstrap replicates.
The affiliation of the amoA gene was searched by BLAST (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). For T-RFLP, the PCR product was purified using the gel extraction and purification
kit (Qiagen, USA). Purified PCR product was digested with endonuclease TaqI (10U) (Takara, Japan) at 65°C for 3 h. Fragments were run on an ABI 371X sequencer
(Perkin-Elmer Corp., USA) and analyzed using GeneScan 3.7 software (Applied Biosystems,
USA).
2.3. Real-time qPCR
Real-time qPCR assays were performed to quantify 16S rDNA of β-subclass AOB. Two forward
primers CTO 189fA/B (5’-GGAGRAAAGCAGGGGATCG-3’) and CTO 189fC (5’-GGAGGAAAGTAGGGGATCG-3’),
one reverse primer RT1r (5’-CGTCCTCTCAGACCARCTACTG-3’), and the TaqMan probe TMP1
(5’-CAACTAGCTAATCAGR CAT CRGCCGCTC-3’) were used for AOB quantification (Hermansson and Lindgren, 2001). Primers CTO 189fA/B and CTO 189fC were used at a 2:1 ratio (Kowalchuk et al., 1997). The real-time qPCR assays were performed in duplicate with a total volume of 25μl
reaction mixture, consisting of 15μl of 2× PCR pre-mix of ABI (Applied Biosystems,
USA), 0.5μl of each primer (15 μM), 0.25μl (12.5 μM) of TaqMan probe, 10.75 μL of
deionized water and 0.5 μL of template DNA. All manipulations were performed in laminar
airflow and in low light to prevent light-activated degradation of the fluorescently
labeled oligonucleotide probes. The PCR cycling condition was as follows: 1 cycle
of 2 min at 50°C, 1 cycle of 10 min at 95°C, 30 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C and 60 s
at 60°C. All tubes were maintained on ice and in the dark during transport to the
spectrofluorimetric thermal cycler, Prism 7300 sequence detection system (Applied
Biosystems, USA). All PCR runs included control reactions without template DNA to
test for possible non-specific amplification. The standard curves for AOB were constructed
using a series of DNA concentrations prepared from the plasmid vector carrying the
16S rDNA gene of a Nitrosomonas europaea-like AOB related clone, which was obtained from a clone library constructed during
this study.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Nitrogen removal of anaerobic ammonium oxidation
The AMX enrichment was conducted with the AMX-SBR for 159 days (Fig. 1). The nitrogen loading rate ranged from 0.003 and 0.098 kg-N/m3-d (Fig. 2). At the start-up of the enrichment, NH4+ and NO2- concentrations were 18.6±6.7 and 13.8±7.1 mg-N/L, respectively. TN removal efficiency
was maintained as lower than 70% until Day 42. The NO2-removal efficiency of 62.6±33.7% was higher than that of the NH4+ removal efficiency of 40.7±57.7%. It was expected that the heterotrophic respiration
using NO2- as an electron acceptor resulted in the active removal of NO2- by denitrification. The extra-organic carbon was not supplied for the denitrification,
but heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria can rely on organic carbon caused by in the
degradation of bacteria which were incapable of metabolizing added NH4+, NO2- and HCO3-. The SN concentrations were gradually increased from 31.3 to 248.5 mg-N/L until Day
84. In this period, an average TN removal efficiency was 99.8±0.3%. At the intensive
substrate loading (i.e., 631.2, 685.1 and 496.0 mg/L of SN) on Days 95, 101 and 108,
the AMX-SBR showed significantly lowered TN removal efficiencies from 60.7 to 7.3%.
The AMX activity was recovered by reducing the SN concentration to NH4+ of 52.8~177.8 mg-N/L and NO2- of 54.0~207.0 mg/L (Days 115-139). The TN removal was stabilized at 88.9±2.0%. The
stabilized nitrogen removal rate was 0.066±0.003 kg-N/m3-d for the last four batch
operations (Fig. 2). It was known that NH4+ and NO2- are toxic to AMX bacteria (Lackner et al., 2014). In this study, AMX bacteria are tolerant to high-level NH4+ and NO2- of around 250 mg-N/L. The high substrate tolerance of enriched AMX bacteria can be
attributed to the long residence time of 7 days for the AMX-SBR reactor. It was speculated
that the longer contact time with high SN concentration resulted in better tolerance
to substrate toxicity. However, in the previous study, the SBR showed a high tolerance
to hydraulic shock rather than an up-flow continuous reactor (Jin et al., 2008). Thus, the adaptation mechanism of AMX bacteria to high SN should be investigated
in depth. For example, the metabolism change with low- and high-substrate loadings
can be monitored by transcriptomic technology. Also, there is great interest in the
excellent resistance of immobilized AMX bacteria to inhibitory factors for practical
applications (Lotti et al., 2012).
Fig. 1. The profile of nitrogen and TN removal efficiency of the anaerobic ammonium oxidation in the sequencing batch reactor.
Fig. 2. Nitrogen loading and removal rates of the anaerobic ammonium oxidation in a sequencing batch reactor.
3.2. Taxonomic information of the predominant AOB
During the AMX enrichment, the genomic DNA was extracted to identify the taxonomic
affiliation and growth dynamics of AOB. The change in the microbial community structure
of AOB during the operation was monitored using T-RFLP fingerprinting. Double labeled
T-RFLP together with the TaqI restriction enzyme offered the phylogenetic information of AOB for the nine samples
of Days 28, 56, 77, 101, 108, 115, 124, 127 and 153. As shown in Fig. 3, two predominant terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) for forward and reverse at
219 and 270 bp, respectively, indicate that N. europaea were major AOB (Bae et al., 2011). In addition, relatively low peaks at 491 bp for forward and reverse T-RFs suggest
possible coexistence of diverse AOB including Nitrosomonas oligotropha/communis/europaea/cryotolerans lineage (Bae et al., 2011). The predominant Nitrosomonas europaea-like AOB are the most commonly isolated and well-known AOB because they out-compete
other AOB in environments that are rich in NH4+ (Hagopian et al., 1998; Limpiyakorn et al., 2005; Schramm et al. 1998; Sedlacek et al., 2020). In addition, the N. europaea-like AOB are less sensitive to high NH4+ salt concentration (i.e., 8400 mg-N/L) (Lim et al., 2008). In addition, Nitrosomonas sp. is capable of anaerobic denitrification (Abeliovich and Vonshak, 1992). Nine samples in a time series showed no significant change. Therefore, it was considered
that increase in SN concentration of the AMX-SBR had an insignificant effect on the
composition of AOB at the genus level.
Fig. 3. The T-RFLP pattern for AOB, digested by TaqI using amoA-1F and amoA-2R primer set.
The predominant AOB were confirmed by cloning and sequencing based on the amoA gene. Four OTUs of amoA_ SBR_JJY_20 (FJ577843), amoA_SBR_JJY_9 (FJ577849), amoA_SBR_JJY_63
(FJ577881) and amoA_SBR_JJY_71 (FJ577885) were defined among 47 clones at the cutoff
of 3%. OTUs were closely related to the Nitrosomonas europaea/mobilis cluster (Fig. 4). The relative abundance of the OTUs were 2.1, 59.6, 21.3 and 17.0% for amoA_ SBR_JJY_9,
20, 63 and 71, respectively. The representative OTUs were compared to clones of N. europaea-like AOB which have been collected from the anoxic bioreactor in previous studies
(Table 1). Interestingly, the predominant amoA_SBR_JJY_20 (FJ577843) is similar to the clones
from AMX-related environments and a partial nitrification reactor. The most similar
clone of amoA_SBR_JJY_20 was AF202649 which was found from an anoxic biofilm which
conducts the AMX reaction (Schmid et al., 2000). This implies that Nitrosomonas europaea/mobilis cluster is strongly associated with AMX bacteria. Also, the OTU with the lowest abundance
(amoA_SBR_JJY_9, FJ577849) is also affiliated to the AOB from a lab-scale AMX reactor
(AY369166 in China). These two groups are expected to have a metabolic advantage to
survive in an anaerobic and nitrogen-rich environment such as AMX reactors. The second
dominant sequence of amoA_SBR_JJY_63 (FJ577881) is close to AOB in water environments.
The amoA_SBR_JJY_71 (FJ577885) is related to the AOB from a swine wastewater treatment
plant and an AOB culture which is tolerable to high NH4+ and NO2- concentration. This group of AOB might grow in the toxic environment of high loading
of NO2- in the AMX-SBR.
Table 1. Affiliation of theamoAgene clones analyzed in this study
No.
|
OTU name (Accession number)
|
Number of sequences
|
% Similarity
|
Accession number of reference sequence (Organism)
|
Source of reference sequence (Nation)
|
Title
|
1
|
amoA_SBR_ JJY_20 (FJ577843)28
|
28
|
99.4
|
AF202649 ( amoA anoxic biofilm clone S6)
|
Anoxic biofilm (Germany)
|
Molecular evidence for genus level diversity of bacteria capable of catalyzing anaerobic
ammonium oxidation.
|
91.6
|
AB291772 (uncultured bacterium)
|
Sludge from partial nitrification reactor (Japan)
|
Microbial community that catalyzes partial nitrification at low oxygen atmosphere
as revealed by 16S rRNA and amoA genes.
|
92.1
|
AF532304 (uncultured ammonia-oxidizing bacterium)
|
Biofilm reactor (Portugal)
|
Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic
retention time and the presence of organic carbon.
|
2
|
amoA_SBR_JJY_63 (FJ577881)
|
10
|
99.4
|
AL954747 (Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718)
|
Isolated strain
|
Complete genome sequence of the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium and obligate chemolithoautotroph
Nitrosomonas europaea. |
99.6
|
EF222047 (uncultured bacterium)
|
10m depth in water column (Germany)
|
Comparative analysis of ammonia monooxygenase ( amoA ) genes in the water column and sediment-water interface of two lakes and the 99.6
Baltic sea.
|
99.6
|
EF222034 (uncultured ammonia-oxidizing β-proteobacterium)
|
2m depth in water column (Germany)
|
3
|
amoA_SBR_JJY_71 (FJ577885)
|
8
|
85.5
|
EF431860, EF431858 (uncultured ammonia-oxidizing bacterium)
|
Swine waste water treatment plants (Taiwan)
|
Nitrification performance and microbial ecology of nitrifying bacteria in different
wastewater treatment plants.
|
89.2
|
EU221324 (uncultured Nitrosomonas sp.)
|
Ammonium oxidizing enrichment culture (Netherlands)
|
Physiological and phylogenetic study of an ammonium-oxidizing culture at high nitrite
concentrations.
|
4
|
amoA_SBR_JJY_9 (FJ577849)
|
1
|
98.4
|
AB079054, AB079055 ( Nitrosomonas sp. ENI-11)
|
Isolated strain
|
Physical map location of the multicopy genes coding for ammonia monooxygenase and
hydroxylamine oxidoreductase in the ammonia-oxidizing bacterium Nitrosomonas sp. strain ENI-11.
|
98.6
|
AY369166 (uncultured bacterium)
|
Activated sludge (China)
|
Analysis of the microbial community composition and transition in the activated sludge
of a lab-scale deammonification reactor by molecular methods.
|
Fig. 4. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based onamoAgene of β-proteobacterial AOB. Sequences in this study were depicted in bold. Scale bar indicates 5% sequence difference. The root represents theamoAgene sequence of γ-subclass AOB,Nitrosococcus oceaniATCC 19707 (U96611).
3.3. Growth characteristics of AOB
The population dynamics of AOB responded to the AMX activity (Fig. 5). The average copies of 16S rDNA were low (i.e., 1.53×106 copies/mL) and remained steady during the AMX start-up period. However, the population
of AOB increased quickly. Based on the four concentration values on Days 101, 108,
115 and 124, the non-linear least squares method for the exponential growth function
showed a specific growth rate of 0.111 d-1 during the period of substrate inhibition of AMX bacteria. Thereafter, the concentration
of AOB decreased sharply as soon as the AMX activity was recovered. The reason for
the sharp growth of AOB is speculated that the catalyzing metabolism of AOB is stimulated
by the high concentration of SN in the AMX-SBR during the period of substrate inhibition.
Fig. 5. The growth of AOB during the enrichment of anaerobic ammonium oxidation bacteria.
The syntrophy of aerobic and anaerobic ammonia oxidizers was expected to be beneficial
to nitrogen removal by the production of NO2- by AOB. AOB possess superior growth kinetics than AMX bacteria by order of magnitude
with favorable conditions of oxygen and NH4+ (Wett et al., 2010). However, there has been no clear evaluation of the cooperation or competition between
AMX bacteria and AOB. In this study, quantitative analysis using real-time qPCR revealed
a negative relationship between AMX activity and the growth rate of AOB. Under anaerobic
conditions, they might compete for common substrates because Nitrosomonas sp. can oxidize NH4+ anaerobically using NO2 (Schmidt et al., 2002). When the substrate inhibition lowered the affinity of AMX bacteria towards substrates,
AOB have a chance to utilize the substrates without competition with AMX bacteria.
Under aerobic conditions, the maximum specific growth rate of AOB ranges up to 2.71
d-1 (Mannucci et al., 2020; Park and Noguera, 2004). In this study, the specific growth rate of AOB under anaerobic conditions was only
0.111 d-1. Thus, the growth rate is not comparable to the optimal growth of AOB in aerobic
conditions. However, this exponential growth rate is similar to the specific growth
rate of AMX bacteria, 0.114 d-1 of the AMX-SBR (data not shown). The similar specific growth rates well explain the
immediate and comparable growth for each of these groups of ammonium oxidizers at
different concentrations of SN concentrations.
4. Conclusions
In this study, An AMX-SBR with a conventional activated sludge was operated to reveal
the relationship of AOB growth and AMX activity during the AMX enrichment for 159
days. The AMX-SBR showed efficient TN removal efficiency of 99.8±0.3% by enduring
the intensive substrate loading. However, the high SN concentrations of 631.2, 685.1
and 496.0 mg/L resulted in the serious inhibition of AMX activity. Overall the enrichment
period, T-RFLP and sequencing based on the amoA gene revealed that the AOB population
was stable with predominant Nitrosomonas europaea-like AOB. In particular, the OTUs of amoA_ SBR_JJY_20 (FJ577843) and amoA_SBR_JJY_9
(FJ577849) are similar to the clones from AMX-related environments. This implies that
the coexistence of AOB and AMX bacteria is a common phenomenon for the AMX process.
The specific growth rate of AOB (0.111 d-1) measured by real-time qPCR was similar to that of AMX bacteria. The similar specific
growth rates suggest that the growth of comparable metabolic activities of AOB and
AMX bacteria under different conditions of substrate loading in the AMX bioreactor.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded
by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2018R1C1B5086307).
References
Abeliovich A., Vonshak A, 1992, Anaerobic metabolism of nitrosomonas europaea, Archives
of Microbiology, Vol. 158, pp. 267-270

Abzazou T., Salvado H., Cardenas-Youngs Y., Becerril-Rodriguez A., Cebiran E. M. C.,
Huguet A., Araujo R M, 2018, Characterization of nutrient-removing microbial communities
in two full-scale WWTP systems using a new qPCR approach, Science of the Total Environment,
Vol. 618, pp. 858-865

Anjali G., Sabumon P C, 2017, Development of simultaneous partial nitrification, anammox
and denitrification (SNAD) in a non-aerated SBR, International Biodeterioration &
Biodegradation, Vol. 119, pp. 43-55

Bae H., Park J. H., Jun K. S., Jung J Y, 2011, The community analysis of ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria in wastewater treatment plants revealed by the combination of double labeled
T-RFLP and sequencing, Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, Vol. 46,
No. 4, pp. 345-354

Bae H., Park K. S., Chung Y. C., Jung J Y, 2010, Distribution of anammox bacteria
in domestic WWTPs and their enrichments evaluated by real-time quantitative PCR, Process
Biochemistry, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 323-334

Dalsgaard T., Thamdrup B., Canfield D E, 2005, Anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox)
in the marine environment, Research in microbiology, Vol. 156, pp. 457-464

Hagopian D. S., Riley J G, 1998, A closer look at the bacteriology of nitrification,
Aquacultural Engineering, Vol. 18, pp. 223-244

Hermansson A., Lindgren P E, 2001, Quantification of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in
arable soil by real-time PCR, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 67, pp.
972-976

Jetten M. S. M., Strous M., van de Pas-Schoonen K. T., Schalk J., van Dongen L., van
de Graaf A. A., Logemann S., Muyzer G., van Loosdrecht M. C. M., Kuenen J G, 1998,
The anaerobic oxidation of ammonium, FEMS Microbiology Review, Vol. 22, pp. 421-437

Jin R. C., Hu B. L., Zheng P., Qaisar M., Hu A. H., Islam E, 2008, Quantitative comparison
of stability of ANAMMOX process in different reactor configurations, Bioresource Technology,
Vol. 99, No. 6, pp. 1603-1609

Kowalchuk G. A., Stephen J. R., De Boer W., Prosser J. I., Embley T. M., Woldendorp
J W, 1997, Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the β-subdivision of the class
Proteobacteria in coastal sand dunes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and
sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA fragments, Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, Vol. 63, pp. 1489-1497

Lackner S., Gilbert E. M., Vlaeminck S. E., Joss A., Horn H., van Loosdrecht M C,
2014, Full-scale partial nitritation/anammox experiences-an application survey, Water
Research, Vol. 55, pp. 292-303

Li J., Huang B., Wang Q., Li Y., Fang W., Yan D., Guo M., Cao A, 2017, Effect of fumigation
with chloropicrin on soil bacterial communities and genes encoding key enzymes involved
in nitrogen cycling, Environmental Pollution, Vol. 227, pp. 534-542

Lim J., Lee S., Hwang S., 2008, Use of quantitative real-time PCR to monitor population
dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in batch process, Journal of Industrial Microbiology
and Biotechnology, Vol. 35, pp. 1339-1344

Limpiyakorn T., Shinohara Y., Kurisu F., Yagi O, 2005, Communities of ammonia-oxidizing
bacteria in activated sludge of various sewage treatment plants in Tokyo, FEMS Microbiology
Ecology, Vol. 54, pp. 205-217

Lotti T., Van der Star W. R. L., Kleerebezem R., Lubello C., Van Loosdrecht M C M,
2012, The effect of nitrite inhibition on the anammox process, Water research, Vol.
46, No. 8, pp. 2559-2569

Mannucci A., Caretti C., Ducci I., Lubello C., Gori R., Coppini E., Munz G, 2020,
Ammonia Oxidizing Bacteria (AOB) kinetic parameters estimated using the actual maximum
ammonia oxidation rate, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, Vol. 147,
pp. 104876

Nitahara S., Kato S., Usui A., Urabe T., Suzuki K., Yamagishi A, 2017, Archaeal and
bacterial communities in deep-sea hydrogenetic ferromanganese crusts on old seamounts
of the northwestern Pacific, PloS one, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. e0173071

Park H. D., Noguera D R, 2004, Evaluating the effect of dissolved oxygen on ammonia-oxidizing
bacterial communities in activated sludge, Water Research, Vol. 38, pp. 3275-3286

Purkhold U., Pommerening-R ser A., Juretschko S., Schmid M. C., Koops H. P., Wagner
M, 2000, Phylogeny of all recognized species of ammonia oxidisers based on comparative
16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: implications for molecular diversity surveys,
Applied and Environmetal Microbiology, Vol. 66, pp. 5368-5382

Qiao S., Kawakubo Y., Cheng Y., Nishiyama T., Fujii T., Furukawa K, 2009, Identification
of bacteria coexisting with anammox bacteria in an upflow column type reactor, Biodegradation,
Vol. 20, pp. 117-124

Quan Z. X., Rhee S. K., Zuo J. E., Yang Y., Bae J. W., Park J. R., Lee S. T., Park
Y H, 2008, Diversity of ammonium-oxidizing bacteria in a granular sludge anaerobic
ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) reactor, Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 10, pp. 3130-3139

Rowan A. K., Snape J. R., Fearnside D., Barer M. R., Curtis T. P., Head I M, 2003,
Composition and diversity of ammonia-oxidising bacterial communities in wastewater
treatment reactors of different design treating identical wastewater, EMS Microbiology
Ecology, Vol. 43, pp. 195-206

Schmid M., Twachtmann U., Klein M., Strous M., Juretschko S., Jetten M., Metzger J.
W., Schleifer K. H., Wagner M, 2000, Molecular evidence for genus level diversity
of bacteria capable of catalyzing anaerobic ammonium oxidation, Systematic and Applied
Microbiology, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 93-106

Schmidt I., Sliekers O., Schmid M., Cirpus I., Strous M., Bock E., Kuenen J. G., Jetten
M S M, 2002, Aerobic and anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria-competitors or natural
partners?, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, Vol. 39, pp. 175-181

Schramm A., De Beer D., Wagner M., Amann R, 1998, Identification and activities in
situ of Nitrosospira and Nitrospira spp. as dominant populations in a nitrifying fluidized
bed reactor, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Vol. 64, pp. 3480-3485

Sedlacek C. J., Giguere A. T., Dobie M. D., Mellbye B. L., Ferrell R. V., Woebken
D., Sayavedra-Soto L. A., Bottomley P. J., Daims H., Wagner M., Pjevac P, 2020, Transcriptomic
response of Nitrosomonas europaea transitioned from ammonia-to oxygen-limited steady-state
growth, mSystems, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. e00562-19

Sliekers A. O., Derwort N., Gomez J. L. C., Strous M., Kuenen J. G., Jetten M S M,
2002, Completely autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite in one single reactor,
Water Research, Vol. 36, pp. 2475-2482

Strous M., Heijnen J. J., Kuenen J. G., Jetten M S M, 1998, The sequencing batch reactor
as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing microorganisms,
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 50, pp. 589-596

Third K. A., Sliekers A. O., Kuenen J. G., Jetten M S M, 2001, The CANON system (completely
autotrophic nitrogen-removal over nitrite) under ammonium limitation: interaction
and competition between three groups of bacteria, Systematic and Applied Microbiology,
Vol. 24, pp. 588-596

Wett B., Hell M., Nyhuis G., Puempel T., Takacs I., Murthy S, 2010, Syntrophy of aerobic
and anaerobic ammonia oxidisers, Water Science and Technology, Vol. 61, No. 8, pp.
1915-1922
