| Title |
A Critical Review of the Current Policy and Legal Systems of the Urban Regeneration in Terms of the Publicness |
| Keywords |
공공성 ; 도시재생 ; 도시정비 ; 정책 ; 제도 ; 참여 ; 절차 ; 공익 ; 공공의 역할 Publicness ; Urban Regeneration ; Urban Redevelopment ; Policy ; Legal System ; Participation ; Procedure ; Public Interest ; Government Role |
| Abstract |
Although the domestic urban redevelopment projects insist epochal changes, the institutional urban regeneration projects are not different from the existing project structure, and also does not properly reflect the goals and values of the urban regeneration. This study examines the issue of procedure, contents of public interest, and active change of government roles according to the characters of the publicness. Futhermore, this study aims to build the theoretical foundation of the policy and legal system, with the following objectives. First, the common meaning of the publicness, the procedure, the contents, and the principal agent were examined. Second, the goals and values of the urban regeneration projects were examined as those results were plugged in the related part of the policy and legal system of the urban regeneration projects. Procedure and result of urban regeneration projects have both characteristics as the public works and public interests, which can redefine the life of residents and the future of communities. Consequently, the refined paradigm of the urban regeneration based upon the concept of publicness should be changed from the existing priorities of the results, private interest, and passive roles of government to focus more on the priorities of procedure, public interest, and active roles of government. |