Title |
Priority Analysis of Climate Change Adaptation Measures for the Transition to a Climate-Safety Society - Focused on Climate Change Adaptation for the Land and Coast Sector |
Authors |
김나윤(Kim, Na Yoon) ; 박창석(Park, Chang Sug) |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2022.10.23.5.125 |
Keywords |
기후안전사회; 기후변화 적응; 다기준 의사결정 분석; 정책 네트워크 분석; 정책 우선순위 Climate-safety Society; Climate Change Adaptation; Decision Making Analysis; Policy Network Analysis; Policy Priority |
Abstract |
The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) encouraged governments to take more specific measures to adapt to climate change, and Korea also established a systematic basis for climate change adaptation by enacting the 『Framework Act On Carbon Neutrality And Green Growth For Coping With Climate Crisis』. As climate risks are maximized, large-scale complex disasters occur more frequently, and the city needs to strengthen its capacity to adapt to climate change to a climate-safe society. Therefore, this study conducted a policy analysis focusing on climate change adaptation measures in the land and coastal sector that have been implemented so far. The analysis results showed different priorities according to the methodology, and the final climate change adaptation measures were derived by considering both the past and future aspects. Therefore, the priority of climate change adaptation measures in the land and coast sector was found in the order of “Construction and reinforcement of disaster prevention facilities”, “Construction monitoring systems of coastal waters and erosion”, “Construction of coastal disaster monitoring system”, “Development of Climate Change Adaptation Plan”, “Coastal buffer space secured”, “Development of Coastal Disaster Vulnerability Evaluation System” and “Promotion of urban regeneration to adapt to climate change.” This study presented priorities for climate change adaptation measures and suggested policy improvement measures at the level of urban planning and management measures, so it is expected to maximize the effectiveness of the policy. |