Mobile QR Code QR CODE : Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering
Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering

Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering

ISO Journal TitleKorean J. Air-Cond. Refrig. Eng.
  • Open Access, Monthly
Open Access Monthly
  • ISSN : 1229-6422 (Print)
  • ISSN : 2465-7611 (Online)
Title A Study on the Risk Assessment and Reduction of Initial Construction Cost in a Biosafety Laboratory According to Improvement of Supply and Exhaust Method
Authors 황지현(Ji Hyun Hwang) ; 홍진관(Jin Kwan Hong) ; 주영덕(Young Duk Ju)
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.6110/KJACR.2013.25.10.534
Page pp.534-539
ISSN 1229-6422
Keywords Biosafety laboratory ; 생물안전 밀폐시설 ; 생물재해 시나리오 ; 급배기 시스템 ; 멀티죤 시뮬레이션 ; 위해성평가 ; 초기 건설공사비 Biosafety laboratory ; BSL3 lab ; Biohazard scenario ; Supply and exhaust duct system ; Multizone simulation ; Risk assessment ; Initial construction cost
Abstract In general, entire supply air of the BSL3 laboratory should be vented to the outside for its biosafety and the air conditioning system should always be operating to maintain a room pressure difference. In this regard, annual energy consumption is approximately five or ten times greater than the magnitude of the office building. In addition, to adjust room pressure difference to the set value efficiently, the supply and exhaust duct system are installed in each room of the BSL3 lab. Thus, initial construction cost is extremely high. In this study, multizone simulation is performed to estimate maintaining the appropriate room pressure difference in the case of changing model A (each room supply and exhaust system) to model B (each zone supply and exhaust system) for verification of the BSL3 lab biosafety. Also, in the case of these two models, the multizone simulation for three kinds of biohazard scenario is performed as part of risk assessment. The analysis of initial construction cost of two models is conducted for comparison. According to the studies, initial construction cost of model B is less than about 22% of existing model A. Moreover, biosafety of the BSL3 lab is still maintaining in the case of the two models.