Mobile QR Code QR CODE

Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute

J Korea Inst. Struct. Maint. Insp.
  • Indexed by
  • Korea Citation Index (KCI)

  1. Member, K-water Research Institute, Head Researcher, Corresponding author
  2. Member, K-water Research Institute, Research Fellow



댐 안전, 침투류, 댐 누수, 필댐, 재해 경감
Dam safety, Seepage, Dam leakage, Embankment dam, Hazard mitigation

1. Introduction

The increasing demands for water security and the global transition toward renewable energy underscore the critical importance of dam safety. Dams are indispensable infrastructure, providing water for irrigation, drinking, and hydropower generation. However, as these structures age and face extreme hydrological events, the risk of failure grows significantly. Among various types, embankment dams are particularly susceptible to the safety issues like overtopping and internal erosion (Kim et al., 2023; Lee and Choi, 2019).

Despite advancements in modern engineering and safety practices, dam failures continue to occur in the 21st century. Notable examples include the Oroville Dam spillway incident, the Taum Sauk Dam breach, and the Edenville Dam failure. The Oroville incident, while not a complete dam failure, involved severe erosion of the main and emergency spillways due to design flaws, construction defects, and geological weaknesses (France et al., 2018). The Taum Sauk Dam, a pumped storage hydroelectric facility, failed catastrophically after its upper reservoir overtopped due to instrumentation malfunctions, leading to extensive erosion and a complete breach (Rogers et al., 2010). Similarly, the Edenville Dam failure, caused by prolonged intense rainfall and historic flood levels, demonstrated the risks associated with aging dams lacking adequate spillway capacity, particularly in the context of climate change (France et al., 2022).

Learning from these incidents is imperative for improving dam safety management and mitigating future risks.

Earth-cored embankment dams, characterized by a central clay core that serves as the primary water barrier, are widely used due to their versatility and cost-effectiveness.

Five case studies of earth-cored embankment dams in Korea were performed in this study, all of which experienced core material degradation leading to seepage-related safety concerns. Through a detailed analysis of the dam safety incidents shown in this paper, the study seeks to derive actionable lessons for enhancing dam safety protocols and ensuring the long-term integrity of these vital structures.

This paper provides a concise summary of technical analyses of each dam incident including geotechnical and geophysical investigations to infer potential causes and propose remedial measures. It highlights construction material issues, inadequate compaction, and arching effects during the initial filling process as key contributors to core degradation. The study also evaluates low-pressure permeation grouting as an effective remediation method for restoring the core's impermeability.

The findings of this study aim to serve as a resource for dam safety professionals, offering insights into hazard mitigation technologies and informing strategies for rehabilitating aging dams. The subsequent sections delve into the technical details of the case studies, identify the causes of degradation, and discuss the implications of the proposed solutions.

2. Case Studies of Dam Incidents

2.1 Dams in This Study

This study investigates the safety incidents at five earth-cored embankment dams in Korea, denoted as W, A, D, Y, and H dam. A summary of their dimensions, construction timelines, observed degradation, and remediation measures is provided in Table 1. Fig. 1 illustrates their typical cross- sections.

These dams, built with central clay cores serving as primary water barriers, exhibited varying degrees of core material degradation. Observed issues included sinkholes, wet zones, slope failures, and increased seepage rates. Initial remediation efforts, such as compaction and grouting, were often insufficient, necessitating further intervention. Ultimately, low-pressure permeation grouting was implemented in all cases as the definitive remediation strategy to restore functionality and safety.

Fig. 1 Typical cross-section of dams in the study

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig1.png

Table 1 Comparative analysis of construction, safety incidents, and measures for five dams

Dam

W

A

D

Y

H

Construction period

Dec. 1985 - Jun. 1993

Aug. 1968 -

Dec. 1971

Nov. 1986 -

May 1990

Dec. 1977 -

Dec. 1979

Built in Dec. 1984

Raised in Dec. 2004

H (m)

55

32.5

55

24.5

35

L (m)

407

223.5

326

120

315

Reservoir capacity (million m3)

135

18

8

5

0.9

Incidents

Apr.-Oct. 1998

Three sinkholes found near crest,

locally fluidized cores found,

excessive leakage

Jun. 1985

Wet zone found on the downstream slope,

Jul. 2003 Downstream slope sliding after intensive rainfall

Aug. 2013

Locally fluidized cores found during borehole investigation, Cores with coarse-grained materials near crest

Aug. 2013 Locally fluidized or weakened cores found during borehole investigation

Oct. 2014

Leakage found on the downstream berm and extensive wet zones found on the surface

Remediation

May - Aug. 2000.

Partial compaction grouting (L80m)

Apr. - Sept. 2003 Permeation grouting

Jul. 1986 - May 1989

General grouting performed four times

Aug. - Oct. 2003 Downstream slope sliding and emergency slope protection

May - Oct. 2004 Permeation grouting

Apr. - Oct. 2014 Permeation grouting and upper crest bentonite injection

Sept. - Dec. 2014

Permeation grouting

May - Oct. 2015

Permeation grouting and upper crest bentonite injection

2.2 W Dam

W dam, a 55 m tall earth-cored rockfill structure, experienced significant core degradation, marked by the formation of three sinkholes near the crest during normal operation in 1998 (Fig. 2). According to Park and Oh (2018), excessive leakage at the downstream toe, reaching 2,340 m³/day at Normal High Water Level (NHWL), was initially reduced to 860 m³/day following partial compaction grouting. However, seepage levels rose to 1,007 m³/day within 2.5 years due to diversified flow paths, prompting comprehensive remediation through low-pressure permeation grouting in 2000.

Subsequent investigations in 2013 revealed localized cracks acting as seepage paths, emphasizing the need for continuous monitoring despite the remediation efforts maintaining core impermeability.

Fig. 2 W dam sinkholes incidents

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig2.png

2.3 A dam

A dam, constructed with a clay core containing significant sandy soil, exhibited wet downstream zones shortly after impounding. Despite four rounds of grouting, heavy rainfall in 2003 triggered a major downstream slope failure (Fig. 3). Emergency stabilization was followed by full-length permeation grouting, addressing fluidized layers detected in geotechnical investigations.

Investigations in 2013, a decade after remediation, revealed new fluidized zones and leaks, suggesting the ongoing development of flow paths. Continuous monitoring was recommended to ensure long-term stability, and the downstream slope was reinforced by with riprap to enhance slope stability.

Fig. 3 A dam safety incident

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig3.png

2.4 D and Y dam

Unlike W and A dams, D and Y dams displayed no visible signs of degradation. However, geotechnical investigations revealed localized core degradation, including fluidized zones, coarse granular particles, and high water content areas (Figs. 4-5). Electrical resistivity surveys identified low-resistivity zones indicative of internal erosion (Fig. 6).

D Dam, completed in 1990, exhibited two fluidized layers at 50% and 75% of the dam height from the crest, corresponding to construction phases with material changes. Similarly, Y dam, completed in 1979, showed loose upper layers and fluidized zones at lower sections, posing long-term risks of internal erosion. Remedial measures included low-pressure permeation grouting for both dams.

Fig. 4 Locally deteriorated core samples in D dam (Park and Oh, 2016a)

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig4.png

Fig. 5 Locally deteriorated core samples in Y dam (Park and Oh, 2016a)

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig5.png

Fig. 6 Electrical resistivity survey result of D dam

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig6.png

2.5 H Dam

H Dam exhibited extensive wet zones on its downstream surface, with leakage observed near the berm at one-third of its height from the crest (Fig. 7). Investigations revealed high permeability and loose core material, with the permeability coefficient exceeding design values. Construction deficiencies, including inadequate core height and steep slopes, contributed to its inherent vulnerabilities.

Remediation involved permeation grouting and bentonite injection in the crest area, addressing both structural and material deficiencies. These efforts effectively restored the dam's impermeability, though continued monitoring remains crucial.

Fig. 7 Anomalies of H dam

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig7.png

3. Lessons Learned

Analyzing safety incidents from aging embankment dams provides critical insights for improving dam safety management practices. This section outlines the key lessons learned from the five case studies, highlighting strategic investigation approaches, proactive diagnostics, mitigation of inherent vulnerabilities, and the importance of a lifecycle perspective in dam safety management.

3.1 Lesson 1: Need for Strategic Dam Assessment to Address Varied Vulnerabilities

Tailored Investigation Approaches: Each dam's safety concerns were addressed through comprehensive geotechnical investigations, including borehole logging, soil and field testing, and geophysical surveys. Matching investigation strategies to specific objectives—such as seepage path detection or material property assessment—is crucial. Techniques like Standard Penetration Test (SPT), soil mechanics laboratory tests, geotechnical site characterization, and electrical resistivity surveys proved instrumental as shown in Park and Oh (2016b). Drone photogrammetry is another useful tool for deformation monitoring (Kim et al., 2021; Park et al., 2023).

Swift Responses to Indicators: Signs of safety issues, such as excessive leakage, sinkholes, or slope instability, demand immediate, in-depth examination, even during operation as indicated in Park and Lim (2016). Methods such as dry borehole drilling and no-rotary wash techniques are effective in these conditions (Park and Oh, 2016a).

Multi-Tiered Assessments: A tiered approach, starting with basic surveys and advancing to detailed investigations, enhances efficiency. For W, A, Y, D dams in this study, initial electrical resistivity surveys provide a broad overview, while targeted drilling and 3D tomography offer in-depth insights into dam integrity.

3.2 Lesson 2: Necessity of Proactive Diagnostics Beyond Visual Inspection for Aging Dams

Proactive Diagnostics Essential: Aging dams require active investigation methods to uncover hidden risks. While W, A, and H dams exhibited visible safety concerns, issues in D and Y dams remained undetected for decades until geotechnical investigations revealed core anomalies (Park and Oh, 2016b).

Bridging Data Gaps: Many older dams lack comprehensive construction or design records as shown in A and W dams. Proactive diagnostics—combining direct investigations and geophysical techniques—are critical for evaluating their safety and extending their operational life as shown in Table 1.

3.3 Lesson 3: Importance of Minimizing Inherent Vulnerabilities to Prevent Dam Incidents

Addressing Core Deficiencies: The studied dams exhibited vulnerabilities such as fluidized cores, saturated slopes, and sinkholes, often resulting from hydraulic fracturing. Alternative theories suggest that internal erosion and material deficiencies, compounded by inadequate compaction and saturation, amplify these risks.

Construction Practices Impact Longevity: Cases such as W Dam revealed that changes in material sourcing during construction directly influenced long-term safety. H dam's excessive leakage stemmed from insufficient core height, emphasizing the need for rigorous quality control during design and construction phases.

Minimizing Inherent Vulnerabilities: By identifying and addressing design and construction errors early, the risk of long-term failures can be mitigated. A lifecycle approach ensures that inherent vulnerabilities are minimized at every stage.

Noteworthy incidents in the dams, including unevenly distributed fluidized cores with elevated moisture content, saturated downstream slopes, sinkholes at the dam crest, and downstream slope sliding, are often attributed to hydraulic fracturing within the core zone. This phenomenon is generally observed in the core zones of embankment dams, aligning with Sherard's theory (Sherard, 1986), which posits that dam damage or failure often results from hydraulic fracturing or dispersive clays. Hydraulic fracturing is characterized by the initiation and expansion of cracks from the upstream side of the core, driven by water pressure surpassing the total stress on the crack surface and the subsequent widening of these cracks. Despite the prevalence of Sherard's explanation, the pattern of incidents in the examined dams raises questions regarding the actual mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. The depth, thickness, and distribution of fluidized zones, alongside the occurrence and dimensions of cracks relative to dam height, suggest a deviation from the classic hydraulic fracturing model proposed by Sherard.

Alternative perspectives offered by Mesri et al. (Mesri and Ali, 1988), Nonveiller (Nonveiller, 1988), and Lofquist (Lofquist, 1988) highlight the impact of water pressure and flow velocity on pre-existing weak areas, leading to internal erosion, piping, water leakage, and slope destabilization. This viewpoint, suggesting the amplification of inherent vulnerabilities due to factors like saturation-induced settlement, variations in material sourcing, and inadequate compaction, offers a more convincing explanation than the traditional hydraulic fracturing theory like the Sherard's theory.

Case studies, such as the W dam, where fluidized zones and water inflow areas are predominantly found at specific depths tied to changes in material sourcing during construction, underscore the significance of construction phase decisions on long-term dam integrity. Similarly, investigations into the H dam revealed discrepancies in core height from design specifications, contributing to significant water leakage.

As demonstrated, design and construction phase errors or deficiencies serve as inherent vulnerabilities that can precipitate failures or incidents throughout a dam's operational lifespan. The identification of such inherent vulnerabilities and their impact on the dam's aging process emphasizes the critical importance of minimizing these inherent risks through meticulous quality control from the outset of dam design and construction. This proactive approach is fundamental to ensuring the long-term safety and resilience of dam infrastructure.

Fig. 8 shows the depth, thickness, and distribution of fluidized zones found in the study dams, and Fig. 9 shows crack occurrence cases investigated by Foster and Fell (Foster and Fell, 1999) and the fluidized zones considered as cracks in the 5 study dams. This shows the status of crack occurrence compared to the height of the dam. As shown in Figs. 8-9, considering the variation in location and size of the cracks, it is difficult to believe that the pure hydraulic fracturing phenomenon claimed by Sherard occurred as described in Table 2.

In fact, in the case of W dam, as shown in Fig. 10, the fluidized zone and the inflow water are concentrated at a depth of 20 to 45 m from the dam crest. According to construction records, the part where the material source was changed during the construction process corresponds to this section. In the case of the H dam, as shown in Fig. 11, as a result of the excavation investigation of the dam crest, it was discovered that the core was not built to the designed height, which can be seen as contributing to the excessive water leakage.

As confirmed in Figs. 8 to 11, incidents that occur during post-construction operation can be seen as being greatly affected by various defects or errors in the design or construction phase. As such, various defects or errors in the design or construction process exist as inherent vulnerabilities throughout the entire life cycle of a dam and can become a major cause of failures or incidents during the operation and management phases. Fig. 12 shows the general relationship between the aging process and inherent vulnerability during the entire life cycle of a dam. In Fig. 12, path O-A-A’ has no inherent vulnerability, path O-B-B’ has some inherent vulnerability and deteriorates faster and has a shorter lifespan than both paths O-A-A’ and O-C-C’. It represents a life cycle pattern in which the vulnerability is so severe that an accident such as collapse occurs during the initial freshening process.

Therefore, minimizing inherent vulnerabilities through thorough quality control from the design and construction process is the best way to ensure the safety of the dam throughout its entire lifespan.

Table 2 Conventional hydraulic fracturing and alternative findings in this study

Aspect

Sherard's Hydraulic Fracturing Theory (1986)

Alternative Explanations found in this study

Failure Mechanism

Water pressure exceeds total stress, initiating and expanding cracks in the core

Water infiltrates weak zones, leading to internal erosion, piping, and seepage failure

Primary Cause

Hydraulic stress leading to cracking

Material deficiencies, heterogeneity, inadequate compaction, and saturation effects

Crack Location

Initiates from upstream side of the core

Found in fluidized zones in center & material transition layers

Crack Pattern

Line

Zone or Area

Main Contributing Factor

Water pressure-driven fracturing

Water flow exploiting pre-existing weak zones

Field Evidence

Cracks should be consistently found relative to dam height

Crack occurrence varies, correlating with construction defects and material changes

Case Study Support

Classic hydraulic fracturing models suggest cracks should be uniformly distributed in core zones

W, D & Y Dams: Fluidized zones matched material transition points

H Dam: Core height discrepancy led to leakage

Recommended Mitigation

Control hydraulic stress in the core

Enhance material selection, compaction, and construction quality control

Fig. 8 Locations and thickness of fluidized zones of the study dams

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig8.png

Fig. 9 Depths of cracks in core and height of dams

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig9.png

Fig. 10 Embanking schedule and change of borrow materials for the core zone (W dam)

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig10.png

Fig. 11 Status of the top of core by excavation investigation (H dam)

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig11.png

Fig. 12 A generic aging model of dams taking into account inherent vulnerability

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig12.png

3.4 Lesson 4: Lifelong Commitment Required for Dam Safety – Addressing Root Causes

Lifecycle Perspective: Dam safety incidents during operation often originate from earlier phases, such as design or construction. Following guidelines from ICOLD Bulletins 154 and 175, organizations should adopt comprehensive safety protocols that span a dam's entire lifecycle, from planning to decommissioning.

Comprehensive Monitoring Systems: Developing and maintaining robust systems for issue identification, monitoring, and response are essential. These systems must be adaptable to address both internal and external risks effectively.

All incidents that occur during the operation phase of a dam originate from the previous phase. Every incident encountered during the operational phase of a dam can be traced back to earlier stages in its lifecycle, encompassing the plan, design, construction, commissioning, operation, and eventual rehabilitation or decommissioning phases. As outlined in the International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD) Bulletin 154, the operational phase represents the most extended period in a dam's lifecycle (ICOLD, 2017). Organizations overseeing dam operations are tasked with the development and maintenance of comprehensive safety protocols. These protocols must be designed to effectively identify, monitor, and rectify any potential or actual issues impacting dam safety over the long haul, while also being robust against both external and internal disruptions.

ICOLD Bulletin 175 (ICOLD, 2021) further emphasizes that incidents during the operation phase are not spontaneous but have roots in the dam's previous phases. This underscores the importance of a holistic approach to dam safety, recognizing that effective incident prevention and management stem from rigorous attention to detail throughout every phase of the dam's lifecycle.

3.5 Lesson 5: Urgent Need for a Government-Level Incident Management System (IMS) for Dams

Integrated Management: Effective dam safety requires government-level incident management systems to support local authorities, especially in cases with limited expertise or resources. South Korea's initiative to classify high-risk reservoirs and provide financial support for reinforcement is an exemplary approach.

Enhanced Technical Oversight: Beyond financial assistance, governments must establish expert-driven frameworks for incident prevention, investigation, and response. This ensures comprehensive safety management across diverse dam infrastructures. The necessity of a government-level incident management system becomes evident in cases like the H dam, where local governmental management faces challenges due to limited dam safety expertise and budget constraints. These limitations hinder effective safety management and can lead to frequent catastrophic failures.

In South Korea, the government's initiative to support disaster-prone and high-risk reservoirs through various projects showcases a proactive approach to enhancing dam and reservoir safety under local government management. By 2023, out of 13,685 local government-managed reservoirs, approximately 230 were identified as high-risk through inspections and risk assessments (Fig. 13). These were subsequently classified as disaster risk reservoirs, qualifying them for government-funded reinforcement measures.

Despite these advancements, the government's role is primarily focused on designating disaster risk reservoirs and facilitating financial support. The technical aspects of incident prevention, investigation, and response largely depend on a selected group of experts. This reveals a significant area for improvement, indicating the need for a more integrated and expert-driven approach within the government-led incident management framework to ensure the comprehensive safety and integrity of dams and reservoirs.

In conclusion, for dams that have experienced incidents, as in the case studies examined, the establishment of an Incident Management System (IMS) is paramount. This system should be capable of methodically overseeing the entirety of the process—from the initial detection of an incident through to its thorough investigation and subsequent reinforcement measures.

Fig. 13 Number of designation of dams with hazards by year in South Korea

../../Resources/ksm/jksmi.2025.29.2.33/fig13.png

4. Conclusion

This study examines five central earth-cored embankment dam incidents in Korea, focusing on core material degradation and seepage-related issues. Each dam exhibited specific challenges, including sinkholes, fluidized cores, wet downstream surfaces, and slope failures. Despite these variations, a common factor was the compromised impermeability of the clay core, often attributed to material deficiencies, inadequate compaction, and complex geotechnical interactions. The common feature among all dams was the degraded impermeability of their core layers, and the degrees of degradation were largely inhomogeneous and anisotropic.

Some key features and lessons to learn are described. According to the electrical resistivity survey of all five dams, significant heterogeneity appears with very low resistivity values. The common cause might be the interaction of a complex set of reasons pertaining to permeable core materials, less compaction, and arching. However, the consequences of these phenomena are exhibited differently depending on the degree of heterogeneity of the causes and how much they are distributed locally or globally.

The case study draws valuable lessons from five dam safety incident case studies, emphasizing the importance of strategic investigations, proactive diagnostics for aging dams, minimizing inherent vulnerabilities, recognizing the lifelong nature of dam safety, and the need for government-level incident management systems. Investigations must match objectives with a tiered approach (basic to in-depth). Swift, detailed investigations are crucial when critical indicators arise. Electrical resistivity surveys provide a useful initial overview, with targeted drilling for further exploration. Proactive diagnostics for aging dams are valuable. Older dams, often lacking design records, require proactive direct investigations even more urgently. Inherent vulnerabilities may lead to long-term incidents (e.g., changes in materials, deviations from design). Operational incidents have roots in earlier phases of a dam's lifecycle. ICOLD Bulletins emphasize this interconnectedness and the need for proactive safety protocols throughout the dam's lifespan. A government- led system with integrated technical expertise is essential.

For remediation of core layer as a water barrier, a low-pressure permeation grouting method is adopted. The empirical case studies and lessons in this paper are expected to offer an important reference for hazard mitigation technology in a wide range of aging dam rehabilitation projects.

Regarding the specific implementation framework, a well-structured Incident Management System (IMS) for dam safety must integrate a proactive monitoring framework with rapid response capabilities to mitigate risks associated with seepage failures. The implementation plan should be anchored in real-time data collection, predictive analytics, and a structured response protocol. First, an advanced seepage monitoring system should be deployed to detect early signs of core material deterioration. Additionally, remote sensing techniques can enhance surface deformation monitoring, offering crucial insights into potential slope instability.

The response framework should be structured around a tiered approach, categorizing incidents based on severity levels and defining clear intervention protocols. For minor seepage anomalies, preventive maintenance measures like controlled drainage and localized grouting should be implemented. For moderate issues involving the development of wet zones or sinkholes, targeted low-pressure permeation grouting can be deployed to reinforce the core material without inducing additional stress. In severe cases, such as large-scale slope failures or rapid water ingress, emergency measures—including controlled reservoir drawdowns and rapid embankment reinforcement—must be enacted. Furthermore, government- level support is critical to ensuring the success of this IMS, requiring the establishment of regulatory guidelines, funding mechanisms, and inter-agency coordination. Periodic dam safety training, scenario-based drills, and public awareness campaigns should also be integrated to enhance preparedness and response efficiency. By embedding these measures into a lifecycle-based dam management approach, the IMS will significantly enhance resilience against seepage-related failures, safeguarding water security and renewable energy infrastructure.

감사의 글

This study is the result of the research project “Innovative digital informatics technology for water infrastructures safety (2023 – 2025)” being conducted with financial support from the K-water Research Institute.

References

1 
Foster, M. A., and Fell, R. (1999), A framework for estimating the probability of failure of embankment dams by internal erosion and piping using event tree methods, University of New South Wales, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering.URL
2 
France, J. W., Alvi, I. A., Dickson, P. A., Falvey, H. T., Rigbey, S. J., and Trojanowski, J. (2018), Independent Forensic Team Report on the Oroville Dam Spillway Incident.URL
3 
France, J. W., Alvi, I. A., Miller, A. C., Williams, J. L., and Higinbotham, S. (2022), Investigation of Failures of Edenville and Sanford Dams, Independent Forensic Team Report.URL
4 
ICOLD (2017), Dam Safety Management: Operational Phase of the Dam Life Cycle, International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD/CIGB), Paris.URL
5 
ICOLD (2021), Dam Safety Management: Pre-Operational Phases of the Dam Life Cycle, CRC Press.URL
6 
Kim, D. H., Park, H. J., Youn, H. J. and Lee, S. O. (2023), Review of the priority index for selection between repair and reinforcement methods of dam facilities. Journal of the Korea Institute For Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 27(3), 1-11 (in Korean).DOI
7 
Kim, T. H., Lee, J. H., Kim, D. S. and Lee, S. B. (2021), A study on dam exterior inspection and cost standards using drones, Journal of the Society of Disaster Information, 17(3), 608-616 (in Korean).DOI
8 
Lee, B., and Choi, B. (2019), A Study on the Verification of water level criteria for forecasting system of reservoir failure, Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection, 23(3), 51-55 (in Korean).DOI
9 
Lofquist, B. (1988), Discussion of “Hydraulic Fracturing in Embankment Dams” by James L. Sherard, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 114(6), 740–742.DOI
10 
Mesri, G., and Ali, S. (1988), Discussion of “Hydraulic Fracturing in Embankment Dams” by James L. Sherard, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 114(6), 742–746.DOI
11 
Nonveiller, E. (1988) Discussion of “Hydraulic Fracturing in Embankment Dams” by James L. Sherard, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 114(6), 746–747.DOI
12 
Park, D. S., You, J.-I, and You, H.-J. (2023), A research on applicability of drone photogrammetry for dam safety inspection, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 27(5), 30-39 (in Korean).DOI
13 
Park, D. S., and Oh, J. (2018), Permeation grouting for remediation of dam cores, Engineering Geology, 233, 63–75.DOI
14 
Park, D. S., and Lim, H.-D. (2016), Stabilization of dam embankment by low-pressure permeation grouting, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 16(6), 325-338 (in Korean).DOI
15 
Park, D. S., and Oh, J. H. (2016a), Potential hazard classification of aged cored fill dams, The Korean Journal of Engineering Geology, 26(2), 207–221 (in Korean).DOI
16 
Park, D.S., and Oh, J.H. (2016b), Statistical analysis of in-situ material properties for aged cores of earth-cored fill dams, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 16(3), 243–256 (in Korean).DOI
17 
Rogers, J. D., Watkins, C. M., and Chung, J.-W. (2010), The 2005 Upper Taum Sauk Dam Failure: A Case History, Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 16(3), 257–289.DOI
18 
Sherard, J. L. (1986), Hydraulic fracturing in embankment dams, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 112(10), 905–927.DOI