• 대한전기학회
Mobile QR Code QR CODE : The Transactions of the Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
  • COPE
  • kcse
  • 한국과학기술단체총연합회
  • 한국학술지인용색인
  • Scopus
  • crossref
  • orcid

  1. (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Hanyang University, Republic of Korea.)
  2. (Korea Electric Power Corporation Research Institute, Republic of Korea.)



Grid-Forming Inverters, Solar Photovoltaic, Electrolyzer, Power-to-Gas, Green Hydrogen, Energy Efficiency, Hydrogen Production, Power Stability, Renewable Energy Integration

1. Introduction

The global shift towards renewable energy sources necessitates advanced solutions for integrating these intermittent supplies into the power grid. Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are crucial in this transition due to their scalability and widespread applicability[1]. PV systems, in combination with hydrogen production via PEM electrolyzers, play a key role in Power-to-Gas (P2G) systems, where renewable electricity is used to produce hydrogen. This hydrogen, referred to as green hydrogen, offers a sustainable and carbon-neutral energy carrier for various industrial applications. However, the inherent intermittency of solar energy poses substantial challenges for grid stability and operational efficiency, when integrated with PEM electrolyzers for hydrogen production​[2]. This intermittency can cause rapid fluctuations in power output, making it difficult to match supply with demand and potentially leading to grid instability[3]. As renewable penetration increases, these issues become more pronounced, demanding innovative solutions to maintain grid reliability while maximizing the utilization of renewable assets.

Grid-forming inverters (GFMs) play a crucial role in addressing these challenges by providing essential stability to the power system. Unlike traditional grid-following inverters, GFMs can independently establish and maintain grid voltage and frequency[4], making them invaluable in systems with high renewable penetration where grid support from conventional generators is limited. Voltage stability across electrolytic cells is vital, as fluctuations can lead to inefficient electrolysis reactions. GFMs ensure a stable input voltage, indirectly supporting the electrolyzer in maintaining steady voltage across the cells, thus preventing operational inefficiencies[5]. This stability is particularly important for PEM electrolyzers, which are sensitive to voltage variations and require precise control to operate within their optimal efficiency range[6].

Moreover, the stability provided by the GFM allows the electrolyzer to operate consistently at its optimal power settings, maximizing production efficiency, as the system spends more time operating in its most efficient mode rather than adjusting to varying power levels[7]. This consistent operation not only enhances hydrogen yield but also improves the predictability of hydrogen output[8], which is essential for downstream applications that rely on a steady supply of hydrogen. By minimizing power fluctuations, GFMs also indirectly ensure consistent output power, which is crucial for applications where stable energy delivery is necessary, such as industrial processes and fueling stations[9].

In addition to enhancing operational efficiency, the consistent operational conditions afforded by GFMs reduce wear and tear on electrolyzer components. This reduction in mechanical and thermal stress extends the lifespan of the electrolyzer, leading to lower maintenance costs and improved overall system reliability[10]. By decreasing the frequency of start-stop cycles and minimizing exposure to transient conditions, GFMs help maintain the structural integrity of the electrolyzer's membranes and electrodes, which are prone to degradation under fluctuating power inputs[11]. This extended equipment lifespan not only reduces the total cost of ownership but also enhances the economic viability of renewable energy and hydrogen production systems[12].

These advantages highlight the critical role of GFMs in the future energy landscape, where the need for reliable, efficient, and cost-effective integration of renewable energy sources will continue to grow. By providing a stable interface between intermittent renewables and energy-intensive applications like hydrogen production, GFMs facilitate a more resilient and sustainable energy system.

2. System Design

2.1 Solar Photovoltaic (PV) System

A solar photovoltaic (PV) system is an advanced technology that converts sunlight directly into electricity using semiconductor materials that exhibit the photovoltaic effect. These systems are made up of several key components, including solar panels, inverters, and mounting structures. Solar panels consist of many small solar cells, which absorb sunlight and generate direct current (DC) electricity. This DC power is then sent to inverters, which convert it into alternating current (AC) to make it usable by homes, businesses, or the electrical grid.

The mounting systems ensure that the solar panels are securely positioned at the optimal angle for maximum sunlight exposure, enhancing efficiency. Modern PV systems often include monitoring and control units to track performance and ensure the system operates at peak capacity. Our specific solar PV system modeled with PSCAD/EMTDC is rated at 1 megawatt (MW), which is sufficient to power a large number of homes or a significant portion of an industrial facility’s energy needs. The system plays a key role in contributing to clean, renewable energy production, helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels.

(1)
$I_{ph}=G\bullet I_{sc}\bullet\left(\dfrac{T_{cell}}{T_{ref}}\right)$
(2)
$P_{out}=V_{oc}\bullet I_{sc}\bullet FF$
(3)
$\eta =\dfrac{P_{out}}{P_{\in}}\bullet 100%$

where, $I_{ph}$ is the generated photocurrent, $G$ is solar irradiance ($W\diagup m^{2}$), $I_{sc}$ is the short circuit current, $T_{cell}$, and $T_{ref}$ are the cell and reference temperatures. $P_{out}$ denotes the output power, $V_{oc}$ is open-circuit voltage and $FF$ is the fill factor. $\eta$ is the efficiency and $P_{\in}$ is the input solar power, which is the product of solar irradiance and the area of the solar panel.

2.2 Grid-Forming Inverter (GFM)

The Grid-Forming Inverters used in this study are rated equivalently to the solar panels and also been modeled . These inverters are connected to the grid via a step-up transformer, which transitions voltage from low voltage (LV) to medium voltage (MV). For controlling the inverters, we are implementing a power-frequency (p-f) droop control strategy. This approach allows the inverters to adjust their output power in response to grid frequency changes, thereby enhancing stability and supporting grid integration. Additionally, the p-f droop method enables seamless operation with other power sources in distributed energy systems, contributing to the overall reliability and resilience of the grid.

Fig. 1. The p-f droop control strategy

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig1.png
(4)
$\dfrac{d}{dt}(\theta)=\omega$
(5)
$\omega =\omega_{*}+m_{p}\left(p_{*}-p\right)$

where, $\theta$ is the angle provided by the control, $\omega_{*}$ and $p_{*}$are the nominal frequency and power values, $m_{p}$ is the droop gain, $p$ is the ac power to the grid.

(6)
$v_{dq}^{r}=k_{p}\left(v_{*}- || v_{dq}||\right)+k_{i}\int_{0}^{t}\left(v_{*}- || v_{dq}(\tau)||\right)d\tau$

Here, $v_{*}$ is the reference voltage and is the reference for the inner voltage control loop.

The measured voltage is compared with the reference voltage generated by the outer voltage reference generator ($v_{dq}^{r}$), resulting in an error signal ($\dot{\zeta_{dq}^{v}}$) that reflects the difference between the two, as described in equation (7).

(7)
$\dot{\zeta_{dq}^{v}}=v_{dq}^{r}-v_{dq}$
(8)
$i_{dq,\: *}^{r}=k_{p}^{v}\dot{\zeta_{dq}^{v}}+k_{i}^{v}\zeta_{dq}^{v}+j\omega C_{f}v_{dq}+i_{dq}$

This error signal is then passed through a proportional-integral (PI) controller, where $k_{p}^{v}$ represents the proportional gain and $k_{i}^{v}$ represents the integral gain. The controller adjusts the control output to minimize the voltage error, while also improving the system's dynamic response and accuracy within the voltage control loop through the use of feed-forward gains. The final two terms in equation (8) correspond to the feed-forward elements, where $C_{f}$ is the output filter capacitance, and $i_{dq}$ is the actual measured current. The output from the PI controller and feed-forward terms generates the reference current signal ($i_{dq,\: *}^{r}$), which is subsequently sent to the current limiter for further processing.

Fig. 2. The inner voltage control loop.

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig2.png
(9)
$i_{dq,\: *,\: lm}^{r}=\begin{cases} i_{dq,\: *}^{r}&{if}\left . ∥{i}_{{dq},\: *}^{{r}}\right .∥\le{i}_{\max}\\ \sigma{i}_{{dq},\: *}^{{r}}&{if}\left . ∥{i}_{{dq},\: *}^{{r}}\right .∥ >{i}_{\max} \end{cases}$
The current regulator (equation 9) serves as the second stage in the cascaded control loop, ensuring that the current reference signal stays within safe limits ($i_{dq,\: *,\: lm}^{r}$) to protect the inverter from operating beyond its capacity.
(10)
$\dot{\xi_{dq}^{v}}=i_{dq,\: *,\: lm}^{r}-i_{dq}^{r}$
(11)
$v_{dq,\: *}^{r}=k_{p}^{i}\dot{\xi_{dq}^{i}}+k_{i}^{i}\xi_{dq}^{i}+j\omega L_{f}i_{dq}^{r}+v_{dq}$

Final stage of the inner control system is a current control loop, which ensures that the inverter’s output current accurately follows the precisely limited reference current signal. Real-time measurements of the inverter's actual output current are provided by current sensors, allowing for precise tracking and control.

The current at the output filter, $i_{dq}^{r}$, is compared with the limited reference current, $i_{dq,\: *,\: lm}^{r}$, generating an error signal, $\dot{\xi_{dq}^{v}}$, as outlined in equation (10). This error signal is processed by a proportional-integral (PI) controller, with​ $k_{p}^{i}$ as the proportional gain and $k_{i}^{i}$ as the integral gain, which adjusts the control output to minimize the current error. Additionally, feed-forward gains are applied to enhance the control response, $v_{dq,\: *}^{r}$, resulting in the signal . The final two terms in equation (11) represent the feed-forward components, where $L_{f}$ refers to the inductance of the output filter.

Fig. 3. The inner current control loop.

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig3.png
(12)
$m_{abc}=\dfrac{2v_{abc,\: *}^{r}}{v_{pv}}$

The signal $v_{dq,\: *}^{r}$ is ultimately modulated and transformed into a Pulse-Width Modulation (PWM) signal, which drives the inverter switches to generate the overall control signal for the grid, as described in equation (12).

2.3 Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Electrolyzer

A PEM electrolyzer is a device that uses electrical energy to break water down into hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis. It consists of three main components: an anode, a cathode, and a proton-conducting membrane that separates them. PEM electrolyzers are known for their high efficiency, operating at relatively low temperatures, and their ability to rapidly adjust to fluctuations in power input, making them ideal for integration with renewable energy sources. In our research, we developed a PEM electrolyzer model in Simulink/ EMT which is rated at 100 kW, 10% of the power source's capacity, while the remaining power is supplied directly to the grid.

The PEM electrolyzer model in Simulink was constructed with the following key components and considerations:

Electrolyzer Stack: Represented the individual cells within the electrolyzer, each contributing to the overall electrolysis process. The stack was modeled based on real-world parameters such as cell voltage, current density, and operating pressure.

Anode and Cathode Reactions: Modeled the electrochemical reactions at the anode and cathode, where water is split into hydrogen and oxygen. The reaction dynamics were key to understanding how power input from the solar PV system influenced hydrogen production.

Proton-Conducting Membrane: This component enabled proton transport while isolating the hydrogen and oxygen gases. The membrane’s resistance and its impact on system efficiency were incorporated into the model.

Thermal Management and Control Systems: Implemented thermal models and control algorithms to maintain optimal temperature and pressure levels within the electrolyzer, ensuring consistent performance even under variable power conditions.

(13)
$\left. 2H_{2}O(l)\right.1 → 2H_{2}(g)+O_{2}(g)$
(14)
$E_{cell}=E^{0}+\dfrac{RT}{2F}\ln\left(\dfrac{P_{O_{2}}}{\left(P_{H_{2}}\right)^{2}}\right)$
(15)
$\dot{m_{H_{2}}}=\dfrac{N_{cell}\bullet M_{H_{2}}\bullet A_{cell}\bullet I_{cell}}{2F}$
(16)
$\eta_{LHV}=\dfrac{\dot{m_{H_{2}}}\bullet LHV_{H_{2}}}{P_{elec}}$
(17)
$\eta_{HHV}=\dfrac{\dot{m_{H_{2}}}\bullet HHV_{H_{2}}}{P_{elec}}$

Equation (13) represents the overall electrochemical reaction where water is split into hydrogen and oxygen gas. Equation (14) is the Nernst equation of cell voltage, where, $E_{cell}$ is the cell voltage, $R$ is the gas constant, $T$ is the temperature, $F$ is Faraday’s constant and $P_{O_{2}}$ and $P_{H_{2}}$ are the partial pressures of Oxygen and Hydrogen. The amount of Hydrogen produced is calculated by equation (15) where, $\dot{m_{H_{2}}}$ is the mass flow rate hydrogen produced in kg/s, $N_{cell}$ denotes the number of cells in the electrolyzer stack, $M_{H_{2}}$ is the molar mass of Hydrogen, $A_{cell}$, and $I_{cell}$ are the area and current density of the cells respectively. Equation (16) and (17) calculates the Lower Heat Value (LHV) efficiency and Higher Heat Value (HHV) efficiency of the electrolyzer under study respectively, where $P_{elec}$ is the amount of electric power consumed.

3. The PV-GFM-ELZ Model

3.1 The PSCAD Solar PV Model

The solar PV system we developed using the PSCAD/EMTDC software contains a PV array, a boost converter and an inverter. The boost converter is used to step up the low voltage output from the solar panels to a higher, more usable voltage level, making it suitable for powering devices or feeding into the grid. This ensures optimal energy transfer and improves the overall efficiency of the system. We took output solar power profile data from the inverter under two scenarios:

The inverter with no Grid-Forming Control blocks.

The Inverter with Grid-Forming Control blocks.

Fig. 4. The PSCAD solar PV System

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig4.png

3.2 The Simulink PEM Electrolyzer Model

We developed a PEM electrolyzer system in Simulink to simulate its performance. The two distinct solar power profile data obtained from the PSCAD model of the PV system was used as the input for the electrolyzer model.

Fig. 5. The Simulink PEM Electrolyzer System

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig5.png

This dual-scenario approach allowed us to analyze the impact of grid-forming capabilities on the electrolyzer's performance, particularly in terms of hydrogen production and system efficiency.

4. Results and Discussions

4.1 LHV Efficiency

The LHV efficiency graph (Figure 6) shows the efficiency trend of the electrolyzer over time, comparing the GFM and non-GFM cases.

• Without GFM : The LHV efficiency shows a more pronounced decline, dropping from 100% to about 65% at its lowest point. This lower efficiency is reflective of the greater instability in the power input, which adversely affects the energy conversion process.

• With GFM : The GFM scenario results in a shallower decline, with the efficiency bottoming out at approximately 70%. The system experiences a quicker recovery as compared to the non-GFM case, reaching near 100% efficiency again by the end of the simulation.

Fig. 6. LHV Efficiency of PEM Electrolyzer

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig6.png

LHV efficiency, which is an important metric for practical applications, benefits significantly from the use of grid-forming control. The results demonstrate that without GFM, the system faces greater efficiency losses during periods of power fluctuation. GFM helps maintain higher efficiency levels throughout the operation by mitigating the effects of these fluctuations. This highlights the importance of stability in renewable energy inputs for optimizing hydrogen production.

4.2 HHV Efficiency

The HHV efficiency plot (Figure 7) follows a similar trend to the LHV efficiency, highlighting the system's energy performance.

• Without GFM : The HHV efficiency begins at 100% and drops significantly, reaching a low of approximately 80%. It then gradually recovers as the system stabilizes.

• With GFM : The GFM scenario also starts at 100% efficiency but experiences a less steep decline in the same time range, dropping to around 85% at its lowest point. The efficiency recovers more rapidly, demonstrating the advantage of GFM in maintaining a more stable and efficient system.

Fig. 7. HHV Efficiency of PEM Electrolyzer

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig7.png

The introduction of grid-forming control significantly reduces the impact of power fluctuations on the electrolyzer’s efficiency. In the absence of GFM, the system is more prone to inefficiencies due to power variations. GFM smooths out these variations, resulting in a less pronounced drop in efficiency and a quicker recovery, ultimately leading to a more efficient energy-to-hydrogen conversion process.

4.3 Hydrogen Production

The graph displaying the amount of hydrogen produced over time (Figure 8) shows a clear distinction between the two scenarios.

Fig. 8. Amount of hydrogen produced by PEM Electrolyzer

../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/fig8.png

• Without GFM : The hydrogen production starts slowly, particularly in the initial phase, and reaches around 12 kg after a 24 hour period. The slower ramp-up and eventual stabilization reflect the fluctuating nature of the solar power input in this scenario, which results in less efficient hydrogen generation due to irregular power delivery.

• With GFM : The introduction of GFM improves the system's stability, allowing for a quicker ramp-up in hydrogen production, which reaches approximately 14 kg in the same time frame. The consistent power input due to the GFM allows the electrolyzer to operate more efficiently and consistently, resulting in an overall higher hydrogen yield.

The grid-forming inverter enables smoother, more continuous power input, allowing the PEM electrolyzer to produce hydrogen more consistently. The higher hydrogen output in the GFM scenario demonstrates the effectiveness of grid-forming control in improving the performance of renewable energy-driven electrolyzers.

5. Conclusion

The integration of grid-forming inverters (GFMs) with solar PV and PEM electrolyzer systems offers significant benefits, particularly in terms of improving hydrogen production and overall system performance. Our comparative analysis demonstrates that GFM provides a stable and reliable power input, enabling the electrolyzer to operate under more optimal conditions, which is critical for Power-to-Gas (P2G) systems. The stable operation facilitated by GFMs helps ensure a consistent supply of green hydrogen, supporting the growing demand for sustainable energy carriers. This stability reduces the impact of power fluctuations, resulting in higher hydrogen output and maintaining both LHV and HHV efficiencies at higher levels. These findings underline the importance of grid-forming control in renewable energy applications, especially for systems aimed at producing green hydrogen for decarbonization. Future research can explore the scalability of such integrated systems for large-scale green hydrogen production and P2G applications.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the KEPCO under the project entitled “Development of GW class voltage sourced DC linkage technology for improved interconnectivity and carrying capacity of wind power in the Sinan and southwest regions(R22TA12)”.

References

1 
A. C. Lazaroiu, M. G. Osman, C.-V. Strejoiu and G. Lazaroiu, “A comprehensive overview of photovoltaic technologies and their efficiency for climate neutrality,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 16297, Nov. 2023. DOI:10.3390/su152316297DOI
2 
H. Kojima, K. Nagasawa, N. Todoroki, Y. Ito, T. Matsui and R. Nakajima, “Influence of renewable energy power fluctuations on water electrolysis for green hydrogen production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 4572-4593, Feb. 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.018DOI
3 
A. Gonzalez-Moreno, I. De La Parra, J. Marcos and L. Marroyo, “Grid integration of large-scale PV plants: dealing with power fluctuations,” in Institution of Engineering and Technology eBooks, pp. 139-177, 2024. DOI:10.1049/PBPO222E_ch5DOI
4 
S. S. Rangarajan, E. R. Collins and T. Senjyu, “Grid Forming Inverter as an advanced smart inverter for augmented ancillary services in a low inertia and a weak grid system towards grid modernization,” Clean Technologies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1011-1038, Aug. 2024. DOI:10.3390/cleantechnol6030051DOI
5 
Y. Xia, H. Cheng, H. He and W. Wei, “Efficiency and consistency enhancement for alkaline electrolyzers driven by renewable energy sources,” Communications Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, May 2023. DOI:10.1038/s44172-023-00070-7DOI
6 
D. Guilbert, M. Zasadzinski, H. Rafaralahy and L. Boutat-Baddas, “Modeling of the dynamic behavior of a PEM electrolyzer,” 2022 10th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC), Marseille, France, pp. 78-84, 2022. DOI:10.1109/ICSC57768.2022.9993944DOI
7 
I. A. Sysoev, “Making up Model for Forced Cathode Cooling of Casing Powerful Aluminum Electrolyzer with Prebaked Anodes,” in A. A. Radionov and V. R. Gasiyarov (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE 2020), Lecture notes in mechanical engineering, Volume II. Springer Nature, pp. 1271-1276, Mar. 2021. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-54817-9_148DOI
8 
I. Toure, M. -B. Camara and B. Dakyo, “Literature review based control strategies of electrolyzers systems,” 2024 12th International Conference on Smart Grid (icSmartGrid), Setubal, Portugal, pp. 155-161, 2024. DOI:10.1109/icSmartGrid61824.2024.10578155DOI
9 
A. Dadkhah, D. Bozalakov, J. D. M. De Kooning and L. Vandevelde, “Techno-Economic Analysis and Optimal Operation of a Hydrogen Refueling Station Providing Frequency Ancillary Services,” in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 5171-5183, July-Aug. 2022. DOI:10.1109/TIA.2022.3167377DOI
10 
IRENA, “Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.5 °C Climate Goal,” International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, Dec. 2020.URL
11 
N. Norazahar, F. Khan, N. Rahmani and A. Ahmad, “Degradation modelling and reliability analysis of PEM electrolyzer,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 50, pp. 842-856, Aug. 2023. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.153DOI
12 
J. Park, S. Kang, S. Kim, H. Kim, H.-S. Cho and J. H. Lee, “Enhancing the economic viability and reliability of renewables based electricity supply through Power-to-Gas- to-Power with green hydrogen,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 310, pp. 118485, May 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118485URL

저자소개

보우믹 비두트(Biddut Bhowmik)
../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/au1.png

He received the B.S. degree in Electrical and Electronic Engineering from Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh, in 2021. He is currently pursuing the M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering at Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. His research interests include inverter control, energy systems optimization, and sustainable power applications.

곽주식(Joosik Kwak)
../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/au2.png

He received his B.S. and M.S. degree in electrical engineering from Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Republic of Korea, Since 1996 he has been working for Korea Electric Power Corporation in field of transient analysis and insulation coordination. His current research interests include VSC HVDC application for offshore windfarm interconnection and weak ac system.

김성열(Sung-Yul Kim)
../../Resources/kiee/KIEE.2025.74.6.1074/au3.png

He received the B.S. and M.Phil. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, in 2007 and 2012, respectively. He was a Research Assistant at the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA (2012–2013), and served at Keimyung University, Daegu (2013–2024). He is currently a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Hanyang University. His research interests include computer-aided optimization, renewable energy in smart grids, and integrated energy systems.