The Journal of
the Korean Institute of Interior Design

The Journal of
the Korean Institute of Interior Design

Bimonthly
  • ISSN : 1229-7992(Print)
  • ISSN : 2733-6832(Online)
  • KCI Accredited Journal

Editorial Office

  • Tel. +82-2-564-2598
  • Fax. +82-2-564-2599
  • E-mail. kiid@kiid.or.kr
Authors 임종엽
Page pp.150-157
ISSN 12297992
Keywords 합리주의 ; 미니멀리즘 ; 기호 ; 은유 ; 관찰 ; 대상
Abstract We found the similarities and differences in the works of Italian Architects especially in 1960s Neo Rationalism and also in the products of inclination of contemporary Minimalism. Based on the moderate application of traditional architectural language and on typological prototype, the Italian Architects pursued inherent logic by which the works came to the composition and association rule that show an extremely moderate expression of a spirit indispensable to Architecture. And they turned down the logic of ergonomics, but they searched for the simple and prototypical form that was the architectural language, strongly restrictive, common, and objective, all through the abstraction of Architectural elements in their memories. The overcome from the forms and the methodology of thinking contain common types in Contemporary Minimalism. But, Contemporary Minimalism rejects fundamentally the analogical interpretation and typological prototype from the past.