Title |
Method for Extracting Features of Conscious Eye Moving for Exploring Space Information |
Authors |
김종하(Kim, Jong-Ha) ; 정재영(Jung, Jae-Young) |
DOI |
http://dx.doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2016.25.2.021 |
Keywords |
Eye-Tracking ; Space Information ; Visual Attention ; Conscious Observation ; Eye Movement |
Abstract |
This study has estimated the traits of conscious eye moving with the objects of the halls of subway stations. For that estimation, the observation data from eye-tracking were matched with the experiment images, while an independent program was produced and utilized for the analysis of the eye moving in the selected sections, which could provide the ground for clarifying the traits of space-users’ eye moving. The outcomes can be defines as the followings. First, The application of the independently produced program provides the method for coding the great amount of observation data, which cut down a lot of analysis time for finding out the traits of conscious eye moving. Accordingly, the inclusion of eye’s intentionality in the method for extracting the characteristics of eye moving enabled the features of entrance and exit of particular objects with the course of observing time to be organized. Second, The examination of eye moving at each area surrounding the object factors showed that [out]→[in], which the line of sight is from the surround area to the objects, characteristically moved from the left-top (Area I) of the selected object to the object while [in]→[out], which is from the inside of the object to the outside, also moved to the left-top (Area I). Overall, there were much eye moving from the tops of right and left (Area I, II) to the object, but the eye moving to the outside was found to move to the left-top (Area I), the right-middle (Area IV) and the right-top (Area II). Third, In order to find if there was any intense eye-moving toward a particular factor, the dominant standards were presented for analysis, which showed that there was much eye-moving from the tops (Area I, II) to the sections of 1 and 2. While the eye-moving of [in] was [Ⅰ→A](23.0%), [Ⅰ→B](16.1%) and [Ⅱ→B](13.8%), that of [out] was [A→Ⅰ](14.8%), [B→Ⅰ](13.6%), [A→Ⅱ](11.4%), [B→Ⅳ](11.4%) and [B→Ⅱ](10.2%). Though the eye-moving toward objects took place in specific directions (areas), that (out) from the objects to the outside was found to be dispersed widely to different areas. |