| Title |
A Study on the Spatial Design Method of Public Libraries by the Relationship between the Direction of Danish Public Library Policy and Dokk1 Design Guidelines |
| Authors |
전필규(Jeon, Phil-Gue) ; 박찬일(Park, Chan-Il) |
| DOI |
http://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2020.29.6.108 |
| Keywords |
Danish public library policy; Dokk1; Mediaspace competition brief; Spatial design method |
| Abstract |
South Korea and European countries proposed various public library policies to reinforce user-centered social capabilities to cope with the changing society. It is worth paying attention to Denmark's Dokk1, which won the 2016 Systematic Public Library of the Year Award. The purpose of this study is to examine and present a new spatial design method of public libraries through the relationship between Danish library policy, Dokk1's design competition guidelines, and Dokk1's spatial plan since 2010. With the policies of ‘Nordic Public Libraries 2.0’ and ‘The Public Libraries in the Knowledge Society’, the directivity of Danish library policy in Chapter 2 was divided into three categories: ‘autonomy’, ‘sustainability’, and’ ‘interactivity’. Dokk1's design competition guidelines suggest a variety of guidelines from city planning to library space and rental facilities. Among these matters, it was limited to the matters of the design guidelines for common spaces, media-use spaces, and culture-education spaces. In Chapter 3, the relationship between the contents of Dokk1's design competition guidelines and the directionality of the policy was examined. In Chapter 4, the characteristics of design guidelines for each space sector considered in chapter 3 was analyzed by substituting them into Dokk1's spatial plan. The following conclusions were reached.
(1)Space design for ‘autonomy’: ①Implementation of space boundaries for convenience and security. ②Securing the diversity of space programs by connecting the electronic space. ③Expansion of the perceptional space experience for users. (2)Space design for sustainability: ①Accommodation of flexible and resilient space programs in a distinctive space. ②Enhancement of flexibility according to the change of time. (3)Space design for ‘interactivity’: ①Improvement of perceptual spatial program awareness. ②Increase of connectivity of space by the recognition of traffic ③Inducing users to participate in the complex space. |