| Title |
Domestic and International Trends in Space Design Research Considering Sensory Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder |
| Authors |
강이제(Kang, Yije) ; 김지민(Kim, Jimin) ; 최보인(Choi, Boin) |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2026.35.4.013 |
| Keywords |
ASD; Sensory-Friendly Environment; Space Design; Scoping Review; Neurodiversity |
| Abstract |
This study aims to systematically analyze domestic and international trends in space design research considering sensory characteristics for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and to identify the key spatial components identified in such research. A scoping review was conducted following the five-stage framework of Arksey & O’Malley (2005), with a final sample of 25 studies selected from six domestic and international databases (Web of Science, PubMed, ERIC, KCI, RISS, and DBpia) after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings revealed that relevant studies have been published from 2010 to 2026, with a noticeable increase since 2025, while domestic studies remained limited to three publications, indicating an early stage of development in Korea.
Educational facilities accounted for the majority of the space types examined (20 studies, 80.0%), and school-aged children were the predominant target population. In terms of sensory elements, visual, auditory, and tactile/ proprioceptive environments were most frequently addressed, each appearing in 22 studies (88.0%). Visual design strategies converged on reducing stimulus intensity, enhancing user control, and providing visual structure.
Specifically, these strategies included glare and flicker reduction, low-saturation and neutral color schemes, adjustable lighting, and the control of visual clutter. Auditory design strategies focused on controlling noise and reverberation, preventing sudden sounds, and considering individual differences in auditory sensitivity. Tactile and proprioceptive design strategies emphasized natural materials, varied and safe textures, sensory-regulation furniture and tools, and proprioceptive or vestibular elements such as swings and trampolines. Olfactory and other environmental factors were discussed in 13 studies(52.0%), indicating that they were addressed less frequently than other sensory domains. These factors were categorized into air quality and scent control, thermal comfort, and the integration of natural elements. In terms of spatial configuration, escape and calming spaces, transitional zones, and zoning were identified as key strategies for enhancing predictability and supporting sensory regulation. These findings indicate that space design considering the sensory characteristics of ASD is being discussed not only in terms of reducing individual sensory stimuli, but also as a way to support users in predicting, regulating, and recovering within the spatial environment. |