| Title |
A Study on the Selection Criteria of Inner Floor Materials at Educational Facilities According to the Variation of Educational Environment |
| Authors |
Cho Jin-Il ; Yoo Taek-Dong ; Lee Ho-Chin |
| Keywords |
Educational Facilities ; Curriculum ; Inner Floor Materials ; Performance |
| Abstract |
In this study, analyzing class method of 7th educational course, curriculum and demand performance of materials and user, it is surveyed that materials design performance criteria of floor suitable to future educational environment. The performance surveyed are durable abrasion, impactive alleviation, protected pollution, non slip, and artistic. The results is followed.
(1) It is desirable that the durability abrasion of educational facilities establish 2nd～3rd grade of the KS F 1010, especially open classroom, corridor and stairs establish 4th～5th grade upward 1 grade. (2) The impact alleviation establish under 100G, and open classroom, gymnasium, stairs, english classroom and audiovisual classroom are desirable to establishing under 65G, upward 1 grade. (3) The basic performance grade of protected pollution establish 0.4 to 0.8 by color distinction of KS A 0700 and laboratory, cafeteria, exercise classroom, art classroom, audiovisual classroom, corridor, stairs and toilet establish color distinction 0.2 to 0.4 upward 1 grade. (4) The basic performance of non-slip establish over CSR 0.35～0.9 by KS M 3802, especially open classroom, household exercise, art classroom, cafeteria, corridor, stairs and toilet establish over CSR 0.4～0.9 upward 1 grade. (5) The basic performance of design establish 4 to 6 grade by the past study, and open classroom and calligraphy classroom establish 7 to 9 points upward 1 grade.
Based on this study, It is judged that needed for development of special materials suitable educational facilities, establishing standards and criteria fitting demands, study of variable and special field for educational facilities, study of confirmed objective data of materials, subdivided and concrete study of performance evaluation methods. |