| Title |
Characteristics of the Criteria for Judging the Value of Architectural Assets by City |
| Authors |
강민경(Kang, Min-kyung) ; 안대환(An, Dai-Whan) |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2021.37.12.223 |
| Keywords |
Value judgment criteria; Architectural assets; Daejeon; Sejong; Cheongju; Urban characteristics |
| Abstract |
As of 2020, the ‘1st Basic Plan for the Promotion of architectural Assets’ was carried out according to historical, scenic, artistic, and
socio-cultural values for each city and province. When conducting the basic architectural asset survey, each city and province used the same
value judgment criteria, but the value characteristics of architectural assets were different for each city. The purpose of this study is to
examine the relationship between architectural assets and cities from the point of view of value judgment and the characteristics of
architectural assets that appear in each city. Targeting Daejeon, Sejong, and Cheongju, the characteristics of the times of each city are
identified. The characteristics were identified by classifying the types by historical, scenic, artistic, and socio-cultural values, which are the
criteria for judging the value of architectural assets by city. As a result, historical values were given to the architectural assets that showed
the characteristics of the times in the three cities. Sejong City, which developed relatively recently, gave historical value only to architectural
assets in the form of hanok. Cheongju, with a long history, did not attach historical value to Gak Dang(閣堂). The scenic value is given to
the architectural assets that harmonize with the surrounding environment. Daejeon and Cheongju were judged to be in harmony with the
surrounding environment through the material and shape of the facade. Sejong City, where many buildings have been built in recent years,
won the Architecture Award. In addition, a scenic value was given to architectural assets that would be in harmony with the natural scenic.
Artistic value is given to architectural assets that reflect the characteristics of the times in architectural design and are in a good state of
preservation. Also, Daejeon, Sejong, and Cheongju gave artistic value mainly to architectural assets that have won architectural awards.
Through this study, it can be seen that the characteristics of architectural assets differ from city to city because the characteristics of cities
and the criteria for value judgment for selecting architectural assets are related to each other. Accordingly, it shows that architectural assets
should be preserved, managed, and utilized differently for each city. |