| Title |
An Analysis of Architectural Professionals’ Perception and Crime Prevention Building Code Standards |
| Authors |
강석진(Kang, Seok-Jin) ; 박승연(Park, Seung-Yeon) ; 오하늘(Oh, Ha-Neul) ; 서민진(Seo, Min-Jin) ; 김고원(Kim, Go-Won) |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2023.39.5.71 |
| Keywords |
CPTED; Building Act; Crime Prevention Building Code Standard; Architectural Professional |
| Abstract |
This study was conducted to analyze the perception and application status of architectural professionals, focusing on crime prevention building
standards related to housing, and to derive implications for improving and effectively applying crime prevention building standards. The
results of this study are summarized as follows. First, the standards were often related to the contents and facilities (including crime
prevention facilities) that correspond to the public or semi-public areas. Second, most of the architectural professionals knew about CPTED.
However, the perception of related laws and crime prevention building standards was insufficient, and the necessity of crime prevention
building standards was very much agreed. Third, as a result of analyzing the frequency, level of understanding, and ease of application of
crime prevention building standards, Article 6, 7 and Section 8, 9 are easy to apply. On the other hand, it was difficult to understand and
apply Article 5 and 9 in Chapter 2, Paragraph 1, 4, and 12. Finally, in order for crime prevention building standards to be activated, it was
found that it was necessary to check whether the standards were applied in step-by-step deliberations, and to provide and educate specific
cases(information) focused on building. In addition, it was found that it was necessary to raise the allocation of CPTED-related points in
design contests, provide incentives such as raising the floor area ratio, and form a consensus on the implementation of the CPTED
certification system for buildings. |