| Title |
Spatial Design of Alternative Co-Living Models and Community Revitalization Strategies in Korea, China, and Japan |
| Authors |
장명월(Zhang, MingYue) ; 백진(Baek, Jin) |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2025.41.9.197 |
| Keywords |
Collective Living; Community Formation; Shared Spaces; Private Spaces; Spatial Coordination; Spatial Strategies |
| Abstract |
This study explores the potential of public rental housing design to foster local communities, by analyzing three case studies: the Gangnam LH Phase 3 Complex in South Korea, Tulou Collective Housing in China, and Shinonome Canal Court Block 1 in Japan. The research begins by examining the etymological meaning of community and categorizes its three primary types. It then investigates the spatial characteristics of traditional residential architecture in Korea, China, and Japan, focusing on the interaction between family-oriented communities and their built environments. Through a comparative analysis, the study evaluates key aspects of each housing model, including planning strategies, architectural design features, types and locations of shared spaces, and the relationship between shared and private areas. The findings reveal that each case study uniquely addresses the balance between individual privacy and community engagement through innovative spatial organization. The Gangnam LH Phase 3 Complex emphasizes fluid connections between shared and private spaces, promoting both community interaction and personal privacy. Tulou Collective Housing employs a hierarchical spatial design that encourages natural interaction while maintaining distinct boundaries between shared and private areas. Shinonome Canal Court Block 1 integrates residential and economic functions, fostering social cohesion and local economic vitality. The study concludes that spatial design in public rental housing plays a critical role in shaping community values and everyday life. It offers valuable insights for architects, planners, and policymakers committed to building inclusive, resilient, and culturally meaningful housing environments. |