| Title |
A Comparative Study of Architectural Policy Master Plans Across Regions |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2026.42.7.105 |
| Keywords |
Architectural Policy; Master Plan for Architectural Policy; the Framework Act on Architecture; Text Mining |
| Abstract |
This study aims to objectively identify trends and characteristics in architectural policy by conducting a comprehensive survey of 42 national
and metropolitan architectural basic plans, constructing text-based data, and performing quantitative analysis. Architectural policies in South
Korea show distinct patterns of change over time. First, in terms of chronological shifts, the first plan period primarily focused on creating
physical environments and establishing basic guidelines. However, during the second plan period, keywords such as happiness, welfare, and
safety emerged, signaling a shift toward citizen-centered and tangible policy goals. In the most recent third plan, key agendas have expanded
to include daily life, the future, and smart technology. Second, a comparative analysis by governing entities shows that the national
government concentrates on macro-level directions and institutional frameworks, whereas local governments focus on region-specific
implementation tasks. Third, regional differences are also evident. Metropolitan cities place strong emphasis on urban regeneration and the
adoption of smart construction technologies to address urban density challenges. In contrast, non-metropolitan areas prioritize improving
settlement conditions by utilizing architectural assets and expanding social overhead capital. In conclusion, this study provides objective
indicators for evaluating architectural policy trends and offers direction for future improvements in the upcoming Architectural Policy Plan. |