Mobile QR Code QR CODE

  1. (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea)
  2. (Agency for Defense Development, Changwon, Korea)



Sigma-delta ADC, low noise, band pass filter, sonar sensor, receiver, parallel-to-serial interface

I. INTRODUCTION

Sonar systems have been widely used to measure distances between objects in the ocean, and they have been actively studied from various perspectives such as sensor modeling and signal processing of the ultrasonic signal. Fig. 1 shows the ocean acoustic measurement environment. The environment has many noise sources and the receiver is exposed to all of these noise sources. The presence of all of these noise sources in the ocean environment degrades the performance of the receiver. As shown in Fig. 1, the distance between Object1 and the Receiving equipment is larger than $d_{2}$, the distance between Object2 and the Receiving equipment. Particularly when receiving signals from more distant objects, the presence of noise sources reduces the SNR performance even further. Thus, the measurement environment shown in Fig. 1 requires a receiver with low noise, and the Input-Referred (IR) noise should be lowered so as to improve the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and sensitivity of the receiver. On the other hand, as the distance between the object and the Receiving equipment is shortened, the input signal level of the receiver will increase, which can lead to nonlinear harmonic distortion in the receiver.

Fig. 1. Environment of measuring distance using sonar signal in the ocean.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig1.png

In order to process the data from sonar sensors, the sonar signal conditioning receiver requires a pre-amplifier, Variable Gain Amplifier (VGA), filter, and Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC). As the amplitude of the signal from the sonar source is dependent on the distance between the sonar source and receiver, the receiver should have a wide dynamic gain range, low noise, and a high signal to noise ratio (SNR).

In addition, in order to process small and large input signal levels depending on the distance, high dynamic range and Automatic Gain Control (AGC) are required.

Signal processing circuits including high-resolution ADCs have been actively researched (1-9) due to the fact that a high-resolution ADC must be implemented in order to ensure the high sensitivity of the receiver. The ADCs in the reference papers (1-9) used a fixed oversampling ratio (OSR). The power consumption of the SD ADC can be reduced by lowering the sampling clock. In this paper, SDM uses variable sampling rates in order to lower the power consumption. Moreover, for the object detection in the ocean environment, the signal is processed in the time domain, and the timing resolution is critical because the sonar system requires many samples in the time domain. For the processing of many samples in the analog front-end, a high data rate is required. However, if the conventional ADC architectures (1-9) are adopted, the power consumption needs to be increased in order to achieve a high data rate. Therefore, the reconfigurable ADC architecture in this paper is proposed to reduce the power consumption, which can provide many samples up to 12.5 MS/s for accurate signal detection.

The recent trends are focusing more on sensor arrays than single sonar sensors. Sensor arrays can be advantageous in terms of reducing the area and lowering costs accordingly (10-14). In order to process a signal from a sensor array, a multi-channel receiver (15-21) is needed. In the sonar signal detection, each channel should be simultaneously processing a signal from a sensor array. In addition, all of the channels must meet the requirements mentioned above. In addition, channel-to-channel matching is required to reduce the data error. The phase differences between channels are minimized in the proposed receiver so as to avoid having a large phase difference.

In this paper, we propose a receiver with a low noise pre-amplifier and wide dynamic range for sonar sensors. The pre-amplifier in the proposed receiver has a low IR noise of 29.6 nV/√Hz at 50 kHz. It can also apply the DC bias point of 1.2 V to the external sonar sensors, since they do not have the DC bias voltage required for proper MOSFET operation. A receiver takes a signal from each sensor of the sensor array and processes it in a single channel. For a sensor array, a technique integrating the separate multichannel circuits for signal processing is essential. The proposed receiver also includes the Sigma-Delta ADC (SD ADC) with reconfigurable decimation factor, and the sampling frequency can be varied with the oversampling ratio (OSR). In this paper, we propose and design a five-channel low noise receiver with SD ADC with a reconfigurable sampling rate of 1.5 MS/s - 12.5 MS/s.

II. PROPOSED LOW NOISE RECEIVER ARCHITECTURE FOR SONAR SENSOR

The system specification of the proposed receiver is shown in Table 1. The range of the input voltage amplitude is from -100 dBV to -29 dBV; a range this large requires a large dynamic gain range in the receiver. This system requires the IR noise to be less than -150 dBV / √Hz. When multiple input signals are sent to the proposed receiver in the same phase, the output of that will be less than 1 degree. The use of a Parallel-to-Serial (P2S) system is also essential, due to the number of channels. Using the P2S circuit, it is possible to reduce the number of data output pins. Fig. 2 shows the equivalent circuit of the unit sensor of the sensor array. The sensor can be modeled with a resistor and capacitor; the resistance is 1 kΩ and the capacitance is 100 nF. It does not share the ground with the proposed receiver. Therefore, the proposed receiver uses a pre-amplifier with input basing in order to define the input DC voltage level.

A block diagram of the proposed receiver is shown in Fig. 3. Each channel of the proposed receiver consists of a pre-amplifier, a variable gain amplifier (VGA), a band pass filter (BPF), an SD ADC, and P2S circuits into one chip. When a differential signal comes from the sensor array, each signal goes into each channel of the 5-channel receiver IC. The receiver is designed to minimize the noise, thus maximizing the SNR with the high-resolution SD ADC.

Table 1. System specification

Parameter

Specification

Input voltage amplitude (dBV)

-100 ~ -29

Supply voltage (V)

2.4

The number of channel

5(in 3.8 mm x 3.8 mm size)

Dynamic range (dB)

20 ~ 100

Resolution (bit)

16

Sampling frequency (Hz)

> 2.5 M

IR Noise (dBV / √Hz)

< -150

Phase error between channels (degree)

< ± 1

Fig. 2. Equivalent circuit of sensor on the input.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig2.png

A block diagram of the proposed receiver is shown in Fig. 3. Each channel of the proposed receiver consists of a pre-amplifier, a variable gain amplifier (VGA), a band pass filter (BPF), an SD ADC, and P2S circuits into one chip. When a differential signal comes from the sensor array, each signal goes into each channel of the 5-channel receiver IC. The receiver is designed to minimize the noise, thus maximizing the SNR with the high-resolution SD ADC.

Fig. 3. Block diagram of the proposed 5-Channel Receiver IC.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig3.png

Each MOSFET in the pre-amplifier of the input stage is designed to be sufficiently large to reduce the flicker noise. Depending on the input signal level, the VGA can adjust its gain to make the input signal level of the ADC reach the Full Scale (FS). BPF has the functions of DC offset cancellation and reducing noise at high frequency.

SD ADC is implemented to achieve high resolution for the high sensitivity sonar sensor application by applying variable oversampling and a chopping scheme in the amplifier. In addition, the Sigma-Delta Modulator (SDM) in the SD ADC uses the clock splitting technique and adopts a digital filter with an adjustable decimation factor for a reconfigurable sampling frequency. A Parallel-to-Serial (P2S) interface is integrated for a multichannel receiver due to the limitations of the pins. The SPI Controller is designed to control the gain of IC according to the input signal level.

Fig. 4. System budget of the proposed receiver with respect to input signal amplitude.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig4.png

Fig. 4 shows the system udget of the receiver. If a small power signal is applied to the receiver, the receiver provides a gain of 97 dB. By contrast, if the input signal level is large, the proposed receiver operates with a gain of 26 dB. Therefore, the input voltage level of the ADC can be maintained at a constant level of about -3 dBV.

III. BUILDING BLOCKS

1. Pre-amplifier

Since the ocean measurement environment requires the use of a low noise receiver due to the presence of various noise sources, one of the most important issues is increasing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the high-resolution receiver. In order to increase the SNR, it is necessary to first lower the noise level of the input signal to the ADC. In the receiver proposed in this paper, the pre-amplifier is designed to lower the noise power for high SNR at the output of the ADC. In general, the IR noise of the pre-amplifier dominantly determines the noise performance of the whole receiver. Therefore, in order to design a receiver with low noise, it is important to minimize the IR noise of the pre-amplifier. In addition, the pre-amplifier suppresses the noise from VGA1 and BPF by providing a gain of 20 dB. A schematic diagram of the pre-amplifier is shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Schematic of pre-amplifier.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig5.png

Since the input DC voltage level of the application is not determined by the external sensor, we design the pre-amplifier to shift the DC level to 1.2 V in order to satisfy the bias condition of VGA1. The size of VGA input MOSFET is optimized in order to minimize the input referred noise. Using this pre-amplifier, the IR noise of the proposed receiver is simulated to be 29.6 nV / √Hz at 50 kHz.

Fig. 6. Schematic of OP-Amp in the Pre-Amplifier.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig6.png

Fig. 6 shows the Two-Stage OP-Amp with PMOS inputs used in the pre-amplifier. Miller compensation with R and C is applied so as to guarantee the Phase Margin (PM) of 60 °. The noise contributions of all of the devices in the OP-Amp are analyzed, with the results shown in Fig. 7. As shown in Fig. 7, the IR noise is lowered by optimizing the MOSFET size and the bias current. Prior to optimization, the flicker noises of the input MOSFETs are the dominant factor. Thus, we reduce their noise to almost 1/10 of their pre-optimization value. Fig. 8 presents the IR noise simulation result of the pre-amplifier, showing the noise of 28 nV/√Hz at 50 kHz.

Fig. 7. IR noise comparison before optimization and after optimization at 0.18 μm CMOS process.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig7.png

Fig. 8. IR noise simulation result of pre-amplifier.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig8.png

2. Variable Gain Amplifier

In order to ensure the high resolution of the SD ADC, precise gain control is needed. The proposed receiver controls the gain with 1-dB step. As shown in Fig. 2, the input signal goes through the VGA1, BPF, and VGA2 sequentially. The maximum gains of both VGA1 and VGA2 are 40 dB. Fig. 9 shows a schematic diagram of VGA1; VGA2 uses the exact same structure as VGA1.

Furthermore, they are designed to be adjustable using a resistive feedback structure by 1-dB step control depending on the input signal level. As the signal amplitude grows, a lower gain is provided in order to satisfy the input voltage range of the SD ADC. The AC simulation result of VGA1 is shown in Fig. 10. The total gain ranges from 0 dB to 40 dB and it provides a variable gain step of 1-dB.

Fig. 9. Schematic of VGA1.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig9.png

Fig. 10. AC simulation result of VGA1.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig10.png

3. Band Pass Filter

An Active-RC Band-Pass Filter (BPF) is implemented in the proposed receiver in order to cancel the dc offset and suppress noise at high frequency. A schematic diagram of the BPF is shown in Fig. 11. The BPF is designed as a fourth order, Chebyshev type. In terms of noise performance, VGA1 is positioned immediately after the pre-amplifier because the noise characteristic of BPF is worse than those of the VGA1 and VGA2. Thus, the noise from BPF can be attenuated by the gain of the pre-amplifier and VGA1.

Fig. 11. Schematic of Band-Pass Filter (BPF).

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig11.png

4. Sigma-delta ADC

Fig. 12 shows the proposed simplified SD ADC designed in this work. The SD ADC consists of an SDM and a digital filter. In this application, we designed it to have a high resolution for the ocean measurement environment. In order to reduce the noise, the SDM is designed to push the noise to a higher frequency so that it can be filtered by the following digital filter. A decimation filter is designed to control the decimation factor so as to lower the current consumption.

Fig. 13 shows a block diagram of the SDM. The second order discrete type SDM with a Cascaded Integrator Feed-Back (CIFB) structure is implemented.

Fig. 12. Simplified block diagram of the proposed SD ADC.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig12.png

Fig. 13. Block diagram of the Sigma-Delta Modulator (SDM).

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig13.png

Two integrators and a 1-bit Quantizer are used. A schematic diagram of the SDM is shown in Fig. 14. The sampling operation is performed in the sampling capacitors as shown in Fig. 14. The differential signals ($V_{REFT}$ and $V_{REFB}$) originate from the analog circuits, including the pre-amplifier, VGA, and BPF. The input differential range of SDM is 2 $V_{pp}$ and the common mode level is 1.2 V. In the first integrator, the coefficient value is determined by the ratio of the sampling capacitor ($C_{I}$/4) and integration capacitor ($C_{I}$).

Fig. 14. Schematic of the designed Sigma-Delta Modulator (SDM).

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig14.png

Fig. 15. Schematic of OP-Amp in the proposed SDM.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig15.png

Fig. 15 shows a schematic diagram of the OP-Amp used in the SDM shown in Fig. 14; it has a gain-boosted Folded-Cascode structure. In order to reduce the flicker noise at low frequency, the chopping scheme is applied. The OP-Amp uses the Chopper PMOS, Chopper NMOS, and Chopper_IN along with their control switches. The chopper pushes the noise in the signal band to a higher frequency. The chopper circuits basically operate based on the clock, which is generated by the CLK Generator, as shown in Fig. 15. In addition, the common mode feedback (CMFB) circuit is designed to keep the output common mode voltage level constant. Since it is in the high gain amplifier, the use of a circuit that maintains the output bias voltage is essential. In order to use a high sampling frequency, the CMFB clock should be separated from the sampling clock. If the CMFB clock is the same as the sampling clock, the gain of the OP-Amp used in the SDM will be reduced, and consequently, the resolution of SD ADC will also be degraded. In this paper, we split the CMFB clock from the sampling clock.

Fig. 16. Structure of the non-overlapped two-phase clock generator.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig16.png

Fig. 16 shows a schematic diagram of the clock generator of the SDM. The circuit generates clock signals $Q_{1}$, $Q_{1D}$, $Q_{2}$, and $Q_{2D}$. In addition, the inverted signals of $Q_{1B}$, $Q_{1DB}$, $Q_{2B}$, and $Q_{2DB}$ from $Q_{1}$, $Q_{1D}$, $Q_{2}$, and $Q_{2D}$, respectively, are also generated by the clock generator circuit.

Fig. 17. Clock signals generated by the CLK Generator.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig17.png

Fig. 18. Structure of the comparator.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig18.png

Fig. 17 shows the clock signal waveforms generated by the clock generator circuit. Since $Q_{1B}$, $Q_{1DB}$, $Q_{2B}$, and $Q_{2DB}$ are inverted forms of the $Q_{1}$, $Q_{1D}$, $Q_{2}$, and $Q_{2D}$ signals, respectively, the $Q_{1}$ and $Q_{2}$ signals are non-overlapped clocks, as are the $Q_{1D}$ and $Q_{2D}$ signals.

Fig. 18 shows the structure of the proposed comparator. Since the associated power consumption is less than that of the static type, a dynamic type of comparator is designed.

The differential output of the second integrator is connected to the INP and INN inputs of the comparator. The outputs of the comparator (SDM_OUT and SDM_OUTB) are determined by latches. The $Q_{1}$ and $Q_{2}$ clock signals control the comparator clocking, and the P1 and N1 signals control certain switches in the SDM, as shown in Fig. 14.

The proposed SD ADC mainly consists of an SDM and a digital filter. The digital filter cuts the noise on the high frequency band. The main function of the SDM is to push the noise to a higher frequency than the input signal frequency. In addition, the order of the SDM determines the slope of the output noise shaping. The use of a higher order SDM leads to sharper output noise shaping on the frequency domain. In order to apply a digital filter to the high order SDM, the digital filter should have high power and a large area with a cascaded structure. In the conventional design, the decimation factor of the digital filter is dependent on the OSR of the SDM. In this paper, a digital filter with a controllable decimation factor and controller is presented.

Fig. 19. Proposed block diagram of the decimation filter.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig19.png

The SDM in this paper has a second order configuration, as shown in Fig. 13. For the small area, a sinc3 type filter is adopted for the proposed receiver. The block diagram of the proposed decimation filter is shown in Fig. 19 to include the Integrators and Comb filters with a cascaded structure. The controller is used to control the decimation factor. Using the CONTROLLER block, the register width and proper clocking within the filter stages can be selected. The Integrator clock is the same as the sampling clock (Fs) of the SDM, whereas the Comb can be operated with the sampling clock divided by the decimation ratio (Fs/D). This process helps the decimation filter reduce the power dissipation at the Comb stage of the CIC filter. This clock is controlled by the CONTROLLER block according to the requirements of the decimation ratio. The register size can be varied through the CONTROLLER by changing the decimation ratio. This is because integration and differentiation (Comb) require different register sizes with different decimation ratios; the register sizes are proportional to the decimation ratio as expressed by the following Eq. (1).

(1)
$$\text{World Length} =L\left(\log _{2} D · M\right)+W_{\text {in }}$$

In this Eq. (1), L is the number of stages in the CIC filter. In addition, D is the decimation factor with variable features, M is the number of delays, and Win is the input word length. Inside the integrator and comb filter, the register size is controlled for the specific decimation ratio. The output of the filter has the 14 Most Significant Bits (MSB) selected from the single wide register (main register).

Fig. 20. Proposed controller for configurable CIC filter.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig20.png

Fig. 20 shows the CONTROLLER used in the decimation filter, which includes the Clock Controller and the Register Controller. The Clock Controller provides the clocks needed in the Comb filter, Integrator, and CIC filter. Eq. (1) shows how the register size is calculated as well as the maximum size for D=2048. This will be the main register used by all of the filters. The controller will select MSB 14-bits from this register based on the decimation factor and discard the remaining bits.

The controller operates by sampling the clock sample with that used in the SDM. The necessary clocks for the integrator, comb, and other control blocks are generated based on this sampling clock. D_CNTRL (4 bits) is used to select from the various decimation factors that are available (32, 64, ..., 2048). The register controller block selects 14 MSBs from the main register and assigns them to the output by dropping the LSB.

5. P2S-S2P Interface

The proposed receiver implements the serial interface circuit inside the IC. For pin-constrained applications, a P2S interface is necessary to transmit the data (10).

Fig. 21. P2S and S2P block diagram.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig21.png

Fig. 21 shows a block diagram of the P2S-S2P used in the proposed receiver, where SYNC is the synchronization signal, DIN means parallel data input, and SDO is serial data output. The P2S interface is designed inside the IC and S2P is in the FPGA board. The ADC outputs the parallel data, which then goes to the P2S interface, whose output is serial form data. This P2S-S2P interface has two synchronization modes: high throughput mode (HTM) and highly synchronized mode (HSM).

In HTM, at first, SYNC is pulled down and the MODE signal is high. Then, P2S receives data from DIN, and at the active edge of clock SCK, transmits it to SDO. SDO is then transmitted in serial from MSB to LSB. In this mode, no overhead bits or extra clock cycles exist. At the time that the communication between the P2S and S2P interfaces begins, P2S and S2P are synchronized once at the negative edge of SYNC. First, MODE is pulled down, and the mode HSM, in which P2S and S2P synchronize, is enabled after all serial data is sent and received. Only when RD is high, P2S takes the sample and transmits it to P2S. This mode is selected due to the features of the proposed receiver, which does not require continuous data. In order to achieve high performance P2S interface operation, $f_{sck}$ (the serial clock frequency) is necessary. This is given in Eq. (2).

(2)
$$f_{S C K} \geq F_{A D C} \times N$$

In Eq. (2), N is the resolution and FADC is the sampling frequency of ADC. The P2S and S2P interfaces are in a synchronous finite state machine (FSM) model-based design. Fig. 22 shows the FSM flow chart for P2S and S2P. The timing diagram of each piece of data is presented in Fig. 23. In this paper, the P2S circuit is only enabled when EN from the control logic is pulled high. For P2S, the positive or negative active edges can be selected by the clock edge select signal (CES). In the POWER_UP stage, the P2S controller moves to ENABLE. Then, the controller goes to the SYNC_DET state and holds on to the SYNC negative edge. When SYNC is released from S2P, the P2S controller jumps to the next stage, LOAD_STX. In the LOAD_STX state, the parallel data DIN is loaded from the internal register transmitting the MSB to SDO. Then, in the SHIFT_STX state, if SYNC is kept low, the internal register value is shifted one bit to the left, and the MSB of the register is transferred to the SDO pin, remaining for N-1 SCK clock cycles. If HTM is enabled, the controller moves state to LOAD_STX in order to take an SD ADC sample. The controller then either returns to the LOAD_STX state so as to receive the next ADC sample or jumps back to SYNC_DET for resynchronization in the case of HSM. The FSM for the S2P controller is shown in Fig. 15(b). The data remain in the POWER_UP state after reset for one clock cycle, then go to MODE_SEL state, and the MODE signal from control logic selects the mode of either HTM or HSM. When the MODE is asserted, HSM is enabled and the controller changes the direction toward the HTM_MODE state.

Fig. 22. Serial interface FSM diagram.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig22.png

Fig. 23. Serial interface timing diagram.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig23.png

In this state, SYNC is pulled low so as to allow for synchronization between S2P and P2S. In addition, S2P enables the SCLK clock and begins receiving serial data at SDI from S2P. The bits are shifted in serial inside the internal register. There is a counter for checking the number of bits received from P2S. If N bits are received, N-bit DOUT loads the register bits. Additionally, in order to announce to control logic that the data have been received, RD is changed to pulled high for one clock.

If MODE is deasserted to select HSM during HTM, the controller goes to the RF_DETECT state after processing the data. When HSM is enabled, the controller moves to the SHIFT_DATA state after waiting for the assertion of RD on the RD_DETECT state. Then, SYNC is pulled down and shifts serial data to an internal register on all rising edges of CLK. This is the process of receiving N-1 bits. Then., when SYNC is pulled up in the SHIFT_EXTRA state, another shift is performed. In the LOAD_DATA state, N-bits on the internal register go to DOUT. When the state changes to the RD_DETECT state, there is an announcement indicating that the data are ready. In the RD_DETECT state, the controller senses the RD signal after checking the mode switch condition. After synchronization, with continuous high RD, the HSM-CR of the S2P remains in the same state so as to enable RD in HSMSR sub-mode or launch to receive the serial stream.

IV. EXPERIENCE RESULT

Fig. 24 shows a chip microphotograph of the proposed receiver. The total area of the proposed receiver is 3.8 mm x 3.8 mm. It includes five channels with a P2S interface.

Fig. 25 shows the evaluation board for the proposed receiver. It employs a low noise low-dropout regulator (LDO) and the Connector to LabView system. It also uses an SMA connector to receive the signal.

Fig. 26 shows the measurement environment of the proposed receiver. For measurement, a function generator applies the sine wave signal. The FPGA board has the function of an S2P interface for testing P2S inside the IC.

Fig. 27 shows the AC simulation result including a pre-amplifier, VGA1, VGA2, and BPF. It has a dynamic range from 20 dB to 100 dB. The result shows that the IR noise simulation result is around -150 dBV / √Hz.

Fig. 24. Chip photograph of the proposed receiver.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig24.png

Fig. 25. Evaluation board for the receiver IC.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig25.png

Fig. 26. Measurement environment of the proposed receiver.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig26.png

Fig. 27. Noise simulation result with minimum gain and maximum gain.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig27.png

Table 2 shows the simulation result of SD ADC according to an increasing sampling clock. Fs is the sampling clock and Fc is the CMFB clock, as shown in Fig. 14. If Fc is divided by Fs, as is the case in this study, the resolution will be improved, particularly with increasing sampling clock frequency (11).

Table 2. Simulation results of SD ADC

FS

OSR

Conventional structure

Proposed Structure

$F_{C}$ = $F_{S}$

$F_{C}$ = $F_{S}$/16

SNDR

(dB)

ENOB

(bits)

SNDR

(dB)

ENOB

(bits)

390.5 kHz

32

86.03

14.29

85.66

14.23

780 kHz

64

86.27

14.33

87.41

14.52

1.56 MHz

128

93.49

15.53

94.15

15.64

3.125 MHz

256

94.51

15.7

94.27

15.66

6.25 MHz

512

89.52

14.87

94.03

15.62

12.5 MHz

1024

74.35

12.35

92.59

15.38

The measurement result of the BPF AC response is shown in Fig. 28. It is flat at the frequency range from 3 kHz to 130 kHz. Table 3 shows the noise measurement result of the proposed receiver. It shows an average of -150.36 dBV / √Hz with adjusting gain. The IR noise is the output noise divided by the gain. When the signal is sent to the receiver, the PSD result of the receiver is as shown in Fig. 29. It is normalized in the X axis to Fin/(Fs/OSR). The PSD result is presented as decibels relative to full scale (DBFS) units. The SNR at the fundamental frequency is 93.5 dB while the signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SNDR) is 82.02 dB.

Fig. 28. AC response of the band pass filter.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig28.png

Table 3. Noise measurement result

Gain Setting (dB)

Noise output

(dBV / √Hz)

20

-126.35

29

-122.87

38

-115.6

47

-105.4

56

-92.38

65

-84.58

IR Noise (average) = -150.36

Fig. 29. PSD measurement result of the proposed receiver with sinewave input.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig29.png

Fig. 30 shows the measurement result of the proposed SD ADC. SNR increases with increasing sampling frequency (FS).

Fig. 31 shows the P2S measurement result. SDO from the P2S is going to SDI of the S2P by the SYNC and SCK signals.

Fig. 32(a) shows the waveform on the channel - 1 SD ADC. In addition, the waveform on channel-2 is shown in Fig. 32(b). Fig. 32(c) shows the overlapped waveforms of Fig. 32(a) and (b) , as well as the phase difference measurement result between two channels when receiving the 3 kHz signal. The measured phase difference is 0.5 °.

Fig. 30. SD ADC measurement result according to increasing sampling clock.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig30.png

Fig. 31. P2S measurement result.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig31.png

Fig. 32. (a) Signal of the channel - 1 output, (b) Signal of the channel - 2, (c) Phase difference measurement result as well as overlapped signals of channel - 1 and channel - 2.

../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/fig32.png

Table 4 summarizes the performance of the proposed receiver.

Table 4. Performance summary of the proposed receiver

This Work

[11]

[12]

[13]

Process (nm)

180

130

65

130

The number of channel

5

96

4

64

Dynamic range (dB)

20 - 100

N/A

40

N/A

IR Noise (nV/�닖Hz)

29.6 @ 50 kHz

2200

@ 10 kHz

N/A

N/A

Bandwidth

(Hz)

2.8 k -

130 k

< 10 k

25 k

1 k

Sampling frequency (Hz)

1.5 M - 12.5 M

31.25 k

10 M

N/A

Structure of ADC

Reconfigurable

Fixed

Fixed

Fixed

Supply voltage (V)

2.4

1.2

1.5

0.9 - 1.2

SNR (dB)

93.5

N/A

84.2

N/A

Phase difference

(degree)

< 0.8

N/A

N/A

N/A

Power consumption (W)

46.8 m

6.5 m

68 u / 1-ch.

(Only for SDM)

1.8 u

(w/o BPF)

Area(mm$^{2}$)

14.44

25

0.03

6

The observed noise performance is superior to that of [11]. Therefore, it can receive smaller signals in the ocean. The dynamic range is wider than that presented in [12]. The bandwidth of the input signal is higher than those presented in [11-13].

Since this work implemented a reconfigurable structure of SD ADC, it can support variable sampling frequency, unlike [11-13]. It can also use a wider sampling clock frequency than [11-13] in order to reduce the power consumption. In addition, the phase difference between channels was not specified in the previous works.

V. CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we propose a low-noise five-channel receiver for receiving dynamic amplitude signals, particularly for low frequency systems for the ocean acoustic measurement environment. Since the environment has various noise sources present, we design the proposed receiver with low noise performance. Furthermore, the power consumption of the receiver in the ocean environment should be lowered for the sake of portability. This proposed receiver applies several design techniques, including the chopping architecture in SD ADC. In addition, SDM in the SD ADC is designed with the clock splitting technique. Further, the digital filter in the SD ADC is designed with a controller so as to lower the power consumption.

The designed receiver has an input-referred noise of 29.6 nV / √Hz at 50 kHz and a total gain of 100 dB. The gain of the receiver is controlled with 1-dB step precise gain so that it can be adjusted according to the power variation of the input signal. It implemented SD ADC with a reconfigurable structure and obtained 93.5 dB SNR performance. The single channel of receiver power consumption is 9.3 mW at a supply voltage of 2.4 V. The receiver used in this paper is designed with CMOS 0.18 μm, and the chip area is 3.8 mm x 3.8 mm. The power consumption is 46.8 mW at a supply voltage of 2.4 V. The proposed receiver can be used in very noisy environments, and particularly in ocean acoustic measurement.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Agency for Defense Development Research Service for Receiving Miniaturization Technology for Small Aquatic Motion (20160927524 - 00).

REFERENCES

1 
Kim S., Na S.-I., Yang Y., Kim S., 2018, A 2-MHz BW 82-dB DR Continuous-Time Delta-Sigma Modulator With a Capacitor-Based Voltage DAC for ELD Compensation, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, pp. 1-8DOI
2 
Weng C.-H., Lin Y.-Y., Lin T.-H., 2017, A 1-V 5-MHz Bandwidth 68.3-dB SNDR Continuous-Time Delta-Sigma Modulator With a Feedback-Assisted Quantizer, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, Vol. 64, pp. 1085-1093DOI
3 
Kim T.-W., Han C., Maghari N., 2016, A 7.2 mW 75.3 dB SNDR 10 MHz BW CT Delta-Sigma Modulator Using Gm-C-Based Noise-Shaped Quantizer and Digital Integrator, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 51, pp. 1840-1850DOI
4 
Chu C., Bruckner T., Kauffman J.-G., 2013, Analysis and design of high speed/high linearity continuous time delta-sigma modulator, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Beijing, China, pp. 1268-1271DOI
5 
Caldwell T., Shibata H., 6-9 August 2017, High-Speed Oversampled Continuous-Time Analog-to-Digital Converters, 2017 IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems; Boston MA, USA, pp. 1001-1004DOI
6 
Basak D., Kalani S., Kinget P., 27-30 May 2018, An On-Chip Static and Dynamic DAC Error Correction Technique for High Speed Multibit Delta-Sigma Modulators, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS); Florence, Italy, pp. 1-5DOI
7 
Hu H., Feng Z., Chen C., 6-9 August 2017, High speed digital ELD compensation with hybrid thermometer coding in CT ΔΣ modulators, 2017 IEEE 60th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS); Boston MA, USA, pp. 1009-1012DOI
8 
Basak D., Li D., Pun K. -P., Sep. 2017, A Gm-C DeltaSigma Modulator with a Merged Input-Feedback Gm Circuit for Nonlinearity Cancellation and Power Efficiency Enhancement, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg papers, Vol. PP, No. 99, pp. 114DOI
9 
Kauffman J. G., Witte P., Lehmann M., Becker J., Manoli Y., Ortmanns M., Feb 2014, A 72 dB DR, CT ΔΣ Modulator Using Digitally Estimated, Auxiliary DAC Linearization Achieving 88 fJ/conv-step in a 25 MHz BW, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 392-404DOI
10 
J.Y. Yoo, M.H. Seo, J.B. Yoon, 18-22 June 2017, HIGH PERFORMANCE FLEXIBLE TACTILE SENSOR ARRAY USING A LARGE AREA PLASTIC NANO-GRATING SUBSTRATE, 2017 19th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, pp. 508-511DOI
11 
Z. WU, C.H. AHN, 18-22 June 2017, WEARABLE PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE SENSOR ARRAY USING POLYSILICON THIN FILM ON POLYIMIDE, 2017 19th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, pp. 1025-1028DOI
12 
Chen Y., Hsieh G., Chen S., Tseng P., Wang and C., 2014, Zinc oxide nanowire-poly (methyl methacrylate) dielectric layers for polymer capacitive pressure sensors., ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces, Vol. 7, pp. 45-50DOI
13 
Harada S., Kanao K., Yamamoto Y., Arie T., Akita S., Takei K., 2014, Fully printed flexible fingerprint-like three-axis tactile and slip force and temperature sensors for artificial skin., ACS nano, Vol. 8, pp. 12851-12857DOI
14 
Ali I., Rehman M.R.U., Kim S.Y., Ahmad N., Lee K.Y., 18-20 December 2017, An Ultra Low Power, 3-Wire Serial Interface Design for Data Converters in PinConstrainted Applications with 180 nm CMOS Technology, 2017 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 104-109DOI
15 
Gao H., Walker R.M., Nuyujukian P., Makinwa K.A.A., Shenoy K.V., Murmann B., Meng T.H., Hermes E., 2012, A 96-Channel Full Data Rate Direct Neural Interface in 0.13 m CMOS, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 47, pp. 1043-1055DOI
16 
Ren Y., Sin S.-W., Lam C.-S., Wong M.-C., U S.-P., Martins R.P., 7-9 November 2016, A High DR Multi-Channel Stage-Shared Hybrid Front-End for Integrated Power Electronics, 2016 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC); Toyama, Japan, pp. 57-60DOI
17 
Gangopadhyay D., Allstot E.G., Dixon A.M.R., Natarajan K., Gupta S., Allstot D.J., 2014, Compressed Sensing Analog Front-End for Bio-Sensor Applications, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 49, pp. 426-438DOI
18 
Jerald Y., Long Y., Dina E.D., Muhammad A.B.A., Ali H.S., Anatha P.C., 2013, An 8-Channel Scalable EEG Acquisition SoC With PatientSpecific Seizure Classification and Recording Processor, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 48, pp. 214-228DOI
19 
Kimura H., Aziz P.M., Jing T.J., Sinha A., Kotagiri S.P., Narayan R., Gao H., Jing P., Hom G., Liang A., Zhang E., Kadkol A., Kothri R., Chan G., Sun Y., Ge B., Zeng J., Ling K., Wang M.C., Malipatil A., Li L., Abel C., 2014, 28 Gb/s 560 mW Multi-Standard SerDes With Single-Stage Analog Front-End and 14-Tap Decision Feedback Equalizer in 28 nm CMOS, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 2014, Vol. 49, pp. 3091-3103DOI
20 
Yoo J., Becker S., Loh M., Monge M., Candès E., EmamiNeyestanak A., 2012, A 100 MHz-2 GHz 12.5 sub-Nyquist-rate receiver in 90 nm CMOS, in IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symp. Dig., pp. 31-34DOI
21 
Duarte M. F., Wakin M. B., Baraniuk R. G., Nov 2005, Fast reconstruction of piecewise smooth signals from incoherent projections, in Proc. Signal Processing with Adaptative Sparse Structured Representations Workshop, pp. 1-4Google Search

Author

Jong-Wan Jo
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au1.png

Jong-Wan Jo received his B.S. degree from the Department of Electronic Engineering at Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea, in 2018, where he is currently working toward the M.S degree in School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University

His research interests include Wireless Power Transfer systems and Power Management IC.

Khuram Shehzad
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au2.png

Khuram Shehzad received his B.S degree in Electrical Engineering with specialization in Telecommunication from Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

He is currently pursuing his Combined MS & Ph.D degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from College of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

His research interests include design of high performance data converters including SAR and SD ADC; CMOS RF Transceiver.

Deeksha Verma
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au3.png

Deeksha Verma received B.S degree from CSJM University, Kanpur, U.P, India and M.S degree in Information and Communication Engineering, Gautam Buddha Technical University, Lucknow, U.P, India.

She is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree at School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.

Her research interests include design of highperformance data converters including SAR ADC, SD ADC and Pipeline ADC

Sung-Jin Kim
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au4.png

Sung-Jin Kim received his B.S. degree from the Department of Electronic Engineering at Inje University, Kimhea, Korea, in 2014, where he is currently working toward the Combined Ph.D. & M.S degree in School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University.

His research interests include CMOS RF transceiver and wireless power transfer systems.

Young-Woo Park
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au5.png

Young-Woo Park received his B.S. degree from the Department of Electronic Engineering at sungkyul University, Anyang Korea, in 2018, where he is currently working toward the M.S degree in School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University

His research interests include Wireless Power Transfer systems and Power Management IC.

Kwan-Tae Kim
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au6.png

Kwan-Tae Kim received his B.S. degree from the Department of Electronics & Radio Engineering at KyungHee University, Suwon, Korea, in 2017, where he is currently working toward the M.S. Course in School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University.

His research interests include analog integrated circuits and CMOS RF transceiver.

Sang-Yun Kim
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au7.png

Sang-Yun Kim received his B.S. degree from the Department of Electronic Engineering at Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea, in 2013, where he is currently working toward the combined Ph.D. & M.S. Course in School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University.

His research interests include high-speed interface IC and CMOS RF transceiver.

YoungGun Pu
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au8.png

YoungGun Pu received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the Department of Electronic Engineering at Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea, in 2006, 2008 and 2012, respectively.

His research interests are focused on CMOS fully integrated frequency synthesizers and oscillators and on transceivers for low-power mobile communication.

Young-Goo Yang
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au9.png

Young-Goo Yang was born in Hamyang, Korea, in 1969.

He received the Ph.D. degree in electrical and electronic engineering from the Pohang University of Science and Technology (Postech), Pohang, Korea, in 2002. From 2002 to 2005, he was with Skyworks Solutions Inc., Newbury Park, CA, where he designed power amplifiers for various cellular handsets. Since March 2005, he has been with the School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, where he is currently an associate professor.

His research interests include power amplifier design, RF transmitters, RFIC design, integrated circuit design for RFID/USN systems, and modeling of high power amplifiers or devices.

Keum-Cheol Hwang
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au10.png

Keum-Cheol Hwang received his B.S. degree in electronics engineering from Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea in 2001 and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and electronic engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, South Korea in 2003 and 2006, respectively.

From 2006 to 2008, he was a Senior Research Engineer at the Samsung Thales, Yongin, South Korea, where he was involved with the development of various antennas including multiband fractal antennas for communication systems and Cassegrain reflector antenna and slotted waveguide arrays for tracking radars.

He was an Associate Professor in the Division of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea from 2008 to 2014. In 2015, he joined the Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea, where he is now an Associate Professor.

His research interests include advanced electromagnetic scattering and radiation theory and appli -cations, design of multi-band/broadband antennas and radar antennas, and optimization algorithms for electro -magnetic applications.

Prof. Hwang is a life-member of KIEES, a senior member of IEEE and a member of IEICE.

Dong-Hun Lee
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au11.png

Dong-Hun Lee received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electronic and electrical engineering from Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea, in 1994 and 1996, respectively, and Ph.D. degrees in electronic and electrical engineering from Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea, in 2017.

Since 1996, he has been a Principal Researcher at the 3rd Directorate, Matitime Technology Research Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Changwon, South Korea.

His main research interests include the area of RADAR/SONAR signal processing, digital signal & array signal processing, and power electronics system & circuit design.

Hyung-Moon Kim
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au12.png

Hyung-Moon Kim received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical, Electronic and control Engineering from Changwon University, Changwon, South Korea, in 2000 and 2002, respectively.

He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree at the Power Electronics Laboratory Department of Electrical Engineering at Changwon University, Changwon, South Korea.

He worked at Korea Aerospace Industries,LTD, Sacheon, South Korea from 2001 to 2006.

Since 2006, he has been a Senior Researcher at the 3rd Directorate, Matitime Technology Research Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Changwon, South Korea.

His research interests include SONAR System, Flight Control System, and Embedded System.

Kang-Yoon Lee
../../Resources/ieie/JSTS.2020.20.4.326/au13.png

Kang-Yoon Lee received the B.S. M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in the School of Electrical Engineering from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, in 1996, 1998, and 2003, respectively.

From 2003 to 2005, he was with GCT Semiconductor Inc., San Jose, CA, where he was a Manager of the Analog Division and worked on the design of CMOS frequency synthesizer for CDMA/PCS/PDC and single-chip CMOS RF chip sets for W-CDMA, WLAN, and PHS.

From 2005 to 2011, he was with the Department of Electronics Engineering, Konkuk University as an Associate Professor.

Since 2012, he has been with School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, where he is currently a Professor.

His research interests include implementation of power integrated circuits, CMOS RF transceiver, analog integrated circuits, and analog/digital mixed-mode VLSI system design.