ChoEou-Sik1
KwonSang Jik1*
-
(Electronic Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, 13120, Korea)
Copyright © The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers(IEIE)
Index Terms
Ultra shallow LDD junction, solid phase diffusion, field extended source/drain, local interconnection
I. INTRODUCTION
In order to increase the ULSI circuit performance, the device shrinkage into submicron
regime and the higher packing density is highly required. As the size of the MOSFET
is scaled down, the junction depth of the source/drain should be decreased to reduce
the short channel effect (1-4). The shallow junction formation and the silicidation on the shallow junction are
essential in obtaining the high performance of submicron devices. However it is difficult
to achieve it by conventional technique such as low energy ion implantation and rapid
thermal annealing (RTA). To reduce parasitic resistance, abrupt dopant profile and
high electrical activation are required. Several technologies have been proposed to
obtain an ultra-shallow junction (5-9). Of those, special efforts for achieving low thermal budget formation of ultra-shallow
junctions have been made. Another challenging problem is a silicidation of the ultra-shallow
junction for achieving a low sheet resistance of the ultra-shallow source/drain region
because a direct silicidation on the ultra-shallow junction has been usually impractical
due to a Si consumption phenomena resulting in a leakage current.
In this study, we present three novel process ideas to obtain above requirements in
current trend. The key ideas are (1) the ultra-shallow junction formation by using
SPD (Solid Phase Diffusion) through ‘amorphous Si (a-Si) / thin oxide’ layer, (2)
the silicidation using SES (Selectively Etched a-Si) formed over the source/drain
which can avoid a consumption of the original Si substrate, and (3) TiSi$_{2}$ local
interconnection approach which can be obtained by itself as a by-product of above
process.
All these ideas have been successfully verified by the fabrication of PMOSFET with
0.76 μm gate length. The schematic structure of the pMOSFET consisting of these novel
processes is shown in Fig. 1 and a layout example for a RAM circuit is shown in Fig. 2. The local interconnection scheme with minimum geometry source/drain junctions can
be used to increase the packing density of sub-micrometer ULSI circuits and to reduce
parasitic capacitance.
Fig. 1. The schematic structure of the pMOSFET with the LDD (Lightly Doped Drain)
formed by a SPD (Solid Phase Diffusion) technology and a Ti-silicided FESD (Field-Extended
Source/Drain).
Fig. 2. Example of the local interconnect as used in as RAM cell (N. H. E. Weste,
“Principles of CMOS VLSI DESIGN}”, p.133).
Fig. 3. The process flow for the application of SPD (Solid Phase Diffusion) method
through $^{\prime}$a-Si / Thin Barrier Oxide$^{\prime}$ Layer to the LDD (lightly
doped source/drain) of pMOSFET (a) gate definition and SPD, (b) wet oxidation, (c)
side-wall oxide formation by RIE.
II. Experimental Details
For the ultra-shallow junction, a solid source of B$_{2}$O$_{3}$ has been driven into
a single crystal Si substrate through 'amorphous Si / thin oxide' layer, where the
amorphous Si (a-Si) layer plays a role as a boron sorption layer and a thin oxide
as a diffusion barrier and simultaneously piling-up region of B atoms. Then, the deposited
a-Si layer is converted into an oxide layer during wet oxidation.
The process flow for the application of this SPD method to pMOSFET is shown in Fig. 3. The starting substrate was n-type, (100) Si wafers with a resistivity of 10${\sim}$15
Ω-cm. Gate oxide thickness was 8 nm and the p$^{+}$ poly Si gate of 2,500 Å was defined
with PSG (Phosphosilicate Glass) oxide of 6,500 Å. Then, thin oxide as a diffusion
barrier was thermally grown 7 nm or 9 nm in dry oxygen ambient at 850 $^{\mathrm{o}}$C.
Subsequently, a-Si layer was deposited 45 nm by LPCVD at 560 $^{\mathrm{o}}$C. And,
boron atoms were diffused into ‘a-Si / thin barrier oxide’ layer from B$_{2}$O$_{3}$
solid source wafers as in Fig. 3(a). As in Fig. 3(b), the B-doped a-Si layer was fully converted into an oxide layer during wet oxidation
for 30 min at 850 $^{\mathrm{o}}$C. As shown, the p$^{-}$ layer formed by SPD is used
as the ultra-shallow junction under the side-wall oxide which makes so-called a LDD
(Lightly Doped Drain) region. In the next step, vertical etching of the oxide layer
is done by RIE (Reactive Ion Etching) process which can remain the side-wall oxide
of the poly-Si gate with PSG as shown in Fig. 3(c). Through this technology, we can obtain the thermally grown side-wall oxide with
the quality much better than any others (APCVD, TEOS, HTO, etc.).
III. Results and Discussion
First of all, we have found out the SPD drive-in temperature condition in order to
obtain a proper sheet resistance value for the extended p$^{-}$ region of the source/drain.
Through the experiments on the sheet resistance variations with diffusion temperature,
we have selected 850 C as the proper drive-in conditions.
Fig. 4 shows the SIMS depth profiles of the boron atoms driven into 'a-Si / thin oxide /
Si sub.' samples. Thin barrier oxide was grown by thermal oxidation (profiles a, b)
for 10 min at 850 C in a pure oxygen furnace or by the boiling in H$_{2}$SO$_{4}$
solution for 10 min at 120 $^{\circ}$C (profile c) before the deposition of a-Si of
450 Å. In the profile d, any native oxide was removed just before a-Si deposition.
We can see that the ‘a-Si / Si sub’ interface with a thin oxide plays the roles of
good diffusion barrier and piling-up of boron atoms. Both the cases of 70 and 90 Å
oxide interface layer have no difference in the boron profiles. And, the oxide (about
30 Å) by boiling in H$_{2}$SO$_{4}$ also plays considerably a role of diffusion barrier
compared to the sheet-off case of native oxide but allows diffusing the boron atoms
into the substrate a little more than those of 70 and 90 Å oxide layer. After driven-in
the boron atoms, the B-sorbed a-Si layer (400 Å) was converted into an oxide layer
(about 1,000 Å) during wet oxidation for 30 min at 850 C and used as a side-wall oxide
in the gate structure of MOSFET through RIE process.
Fig. 4. SIMS depth profiles of the boron atoms diffused into Si substrate through
$^{\prime}$a-Si / thin oxide$^{\prime}$ layer from B$_{2}$O$_{3}$ solid source. SPD
was performed for 30 min at 850 $^{\circ}$C.
Fig. 5. SIMS depth profiles of the boron redistributed during the wet oxidation of
the a-Si layer. Wet oxidation was performed for 30 min at 850 $^{\circ}$C.
Fig. 5 shows SIMS profiles of the boron atoms redistributed during wet oxidation of the
a-Si layer. As shown in the figure, the redistribution within Si substrate has not
occurred during wet oxidation. The junction depth in profiles 'a' and 'b' was about
30 nm and the surface concentration was about 3${\times}$10$^{19}$ cm$^{-3 }$which
could be a sufficient value for a LDD region.
The thickness values of the oxide layers grown during wet oxidation in the different
sample conditions were measured and compared. The thickness grown in ‘B-doped a-Si
/ Si substrate’ was 1,034 Å, while those in ‘boron diffused Si-substrate without a-Si’
and ‘just bare Si without B diffusion’ were 634 Å and 545 Å, respectively. The oxidation
rate of the B-doped a-Si layer was about 1.9 times higher than that of the bare Si,
which indicates that the selective oxidation of B-doped a-Si layer can be easily obtained.
In order to fabricate a pMOSFET using this technology, we have followed the process
steps as shown in the Fig. 6. The p$^{\mathbf{{-}}}$ layer formed by SPD is used as the ultra-shallow junction
under the side-wall oxide. In addition, through this technology, we can obtain the
thermally grown side-wall oxide with the quality much better than any other (APCVD,
TEOS, HTO, etc.). Right after making the side-wall oxide by RIE, amorphous Si layer
was deposited again 40 nm by LPCVD. Then, BF$_{2}$$^{+}$ ions were implanted through
the pre-deposited a-Si layer for making p$^{\mathbf{+}}$ source/drain regions and
RTA was followed to anneal the implanted boron atoms, as shown in Fig. 6(a). Then, in order to make remove selectively the a-Si layer only on the gate, an etch-back
process using photoresist was performed as in Fig. 6(b)-(d). After the PR strip, a-Si layer on field region was patterned using another mask
which could be designed to be elongated on the field region as a local interconnect.
The a-Si layer is completely consumed during Ti-silicidation. Therefore, the consumption
of the original Si substrate in the source/drain area can be avoided and self-aligned
silicidation process (SALICIDATION) can be implemented by itself (10-13). Then, a contact area was formed on the field region, as shown in Fig. 6(e).
Fig. 6. Process flow for the formation of a pMOSFET right after making the p$^{{-}}$
LDD as shown in Fig. 3(a) a-Si deposition, BF$_{\mathrm{2\-}}$$^{+}$ implantation and RTA, (b) P.R. coating,
(c) P.R. etch-back, (d) a-Si etch-back, (e) a-Si patterning with FESD mask, PSG removal
in HF, Ti-deposition, silicidation and contact mask.
Fig. 7. Photographs of the top views for the fabricated (a) FESD structure, (b) conventional
structure MOSFETs. In the FESD structure, in which contact is formed on the TiSi$_{2}$
layer extended over field region, the length of S/D is 2.0 μm, but in conventional
structure, the S/D length is 5.5 μm when designed with same design rule.
Another feature in this study is to develop the process technology with a much more
scale-downed source/drain width compared with the conventional process without sacrificing
the sheet resistance and the contact resistance. We call it “FESD (Field Extended
Source/Drain)” technology. This FESD layer can be also used as a local interconnection.
That is, the contacts to the source/drains can be formed on the FESD above the field
oxide area but not on the active area. Thus, the effective active area can be reduced
by the contact areas. Resultantly, the junction capacitance could be reduced, which
also would be helpful to accelerate the switching speed.
The photos about the layout of the pMOSFET fabricated using this technology is shown
in Fig. 7(a), with comparing the layout (Fig. 7(b)) of the pMOSFET formed by a conventional technology. By using this technology, the
physical design width of active area could be shrunken 2.75 times as a conventional
structure with same design rule.
The successful gate structure formed according to the schematics is shown in Fig. 8. The side-wall on the gate-side and the Ti-silicided source/drain layer extended
over the field oxide are clearly shown. We can see that the physical design area of
the active mask was reduced prominently through the FESD structure.
Fig. 8. SEM cross-section view of the MOSFET with Ti-silicided FESD and thermal side-wall
oxide (a) 20,000 times, (b) 5,000 times magnified.
Fig. 9. I$_{\mathrm{d}}$-V$_{\mathrm{d}}$ characteristics of the FESD-type pMOSFET
with the contact on field oxide region.
Fig. 10. Subthreshold characteristics of the FESD-type pMOSFET with the contact on
field region.
Using above technologies, we have fabricated the pMOSFET with effective gate length
of 0.76 μm. The I$_{\mathrm{d}}$-V$_{\mathrm{d}}$ characteristics are shown in Fig. 9 and the subthreshold characteristics in Fig. 10. The subthreshold swing is about 96 mV/dec and the maximum transconductance is 352
μS at V$_{\mathrm{g}}$=-3.1 V. Drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) of the fabricated
FESD-type pMOSFET is 25.3 mV/V assuming that the threshold voltage is extracted by
the constant current method at I$_{\mathrm{d}}$ = 10$^{-7}$ A/μm and even smaller
value of 11.2 mV/V is obtained if the reference I$_{\mathrm{d}}$ is relaxed to 10$^{-8}$
A/μm.
This technology requires some additional processes such as a-Si deposition and PR/a-Si
etch-back, and also another mask for implementing the FESD layout. However, these
processes are not stringent and conventional. Therefore, for the practical usage,
it will be necessary to consider a trade-off between some processing complexity and
chip scalability/device speed. In addition, some process modification may be necessary
in order to apply this technology independently with nMOSFET for CMOS circuitry.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
We have developed novel process technologies to acquire the breakthrough in a deep
sub-micron device regime. Through the SPD, ultra-shallow p$^{-}$n junction of 30 nm
depth was obtained and a thermal side-wall oxide could be formed simultaneously. By
using the Ti silicidation of selectively etched a-Si layer, the local interconnect
with the contacts formed on field region could be easily obtained, not resulting in
the Si consumption on the source/drain area during silicidation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was funded and conducted under「the Competency Development Program for
Industry Specialists」of the Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE),
operated by Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT). (No. P0012453, Next-generation
Display Expert Training Project for Innovation Process and Equipment, Materials Engineers).
REFERENCES
Yu B., Wann C., Nowak E. D., Noda K., Hu C., Apr 1997, Short-channel effect improved
by lateral channel-engineering in deep-submicronmeter MOSFET’s, IEEE Trans. Electron.
Dev., Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 627-634
Sharma S., Kumar P., Jun 2008, Optimizing Effective Channel Length to Minimize Short
Channel Effects in Sub-50nm Single/Double Gate SOI MOSFETs, J. Semi. Tech & Sci.,
Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 170-177
Omura Y., Konishi H., Yoshimoto K., Dec 2008, Impact of Fin Aspect Ratio oon Short-Channel
Control and Drivability of Multiple-Gate SOI MOSFETs, J. Semi. Tech & Sci., Vol. 8,
No. 4, pp. 302-310
Bohara P., Vishvakarma S. K., Jan 2019, NAND flash memory device with ground plane
in buried oxide for reduced short channel effects and improved data retention, J.
Computational Elect., Vol. 18, pp. 500-508
Lerch W., Paul S., Niess J., McCoy S., Selinger T., Gelpey J., Cristiano F., Severac
F., Gavelle M., Boninelli S., Pichler P., Bolze D., Dec 2005, Advanecd activation
of ultra-shallow junctions using flash-assisted RTP, Mater. Sci. & Eng. B, Vol. 124-125,
pp. 24-31
Chui C. O., Kulig L., Moran J., Tsai W., 2005, Germanium n-type shallow junction activation
dependences, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 87, pp. 091909-1-091909-3
Do S.-W., Kong S., Lee Y.-H., Oh J.-G., Lee J.-K., Ju M.-A., Jeon S.-J., Ku J.-C.,
Jan 2009, Ultra-shallow Junction Formation Using Plasma Doping and Excimer Laser Annealing
for Nano-technology CMOS Applications, J. Korean. Phys. Soc., Vol. 55, No. 3, pp.
1065-1069
Xu P., Fu C., Hu C., Zhang D. W., Wu D., Luo J., Zhao C., Zhang Z.-B., Zhang S.-L.,
Aug 2013, Ultra-shallow junctions formed using microwave annealing, Appl. Phys. Lett.,
Vol. 102, pp. 122114-1-122114-3
Baik S. G., Kwon D. J., Kang H. K., Jang J. E., Jang J. W., Kim Y. S., Kwon H. J.,
2020, Conformal and Ultra Shallow Junction Formation Achieved Using a Pulsed-Laser
Annealing Process Integrated With a Modified Plasma Assisted Doping Method, IEEE Access,
Vol. 8, pp. 172166-172174
Deng F., Johnson R. A., Asbeck P. M., Lau S. S., Dubbelday W. B., Hsiao T., Woo J.,
Jun 1997, Salicidation process using NiSi and its device application, J. Appl. Phys.,
Vol. 81, No. 12, pp. 8047-8051
Lee P. S., Pey K. L., Mangelinck D., Ding J., Chi D. Z., L Chan , Dec 2001, New Salicidation
technology with Ni(Pt) alloy for MOSFETs, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett., Vol. 22, No. 12,
pp. 568-570
Tarighat R. S., pp 244-250 Jan 2021, Low-Temperature Self-Aligned-Silicide-Capable
Transistor Process Using Solid-Phase-Epitaxy and Lift-Off for Hybrid Substrates, IEEE
Trans. Electron Dev., Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 244-250
Ekstrom M., Ferrario A., Zetterling C.-M., Feb 2019, Investigation of a Self-Aligned
Cobalt Silicide Process for Ohmic Contacts to Silicon Carbide, J. Elect. Mat., Vol.
48, No. 4, pp. 2509-2516
Author
received the B.S., M.S. and Ph. D degrees in the School of Electrical Engineering
from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea in 1996, 1998, and 2004, respectively.
From 2004 to 2006, he was a senior engineer with the Samsung Electronics, where he
worked on the process development of large size TFT-LCD. Since 2006, he has been
a member of the faculty of Gachon University(Seongnam, Korea), where he is currently
an Professor with the Department of Electronic Engineering.
His current research interests include fabrication process of semiconductor and display
device, OLED display manufacturing and its application, laser application of transparent
electrode and semiconductor film, flexible substrate.
received the B.S., M.S. degrees from the Department of Electronics Engineering at
Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, in 1985 and 1991, respectively, and received
the Ph.D. degree from the Department of Electronics Engineering at Seoul National
University in 1991.
He worked as a research scientist at Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
(ETRI) from 1983 to 1988, where he worked on MOSFET and power devices.
From 1988 to 1992, he worked as a research assistant at the Inter-university Semiconductor
Research Center (ISRC) where multi-process chip (MPC) and ion implantation techniques
were developed.
He joined Gachon University as a professor in 1992. His research interests include
semiconductor devices, OLED display simulation and manufacturing, transparent electrode,
thin-film compound solar cell, carbon nanotube applications, and related processing
technologies.