I. INTRODUCTION
The implementation of brain-inspired neural networks with the conventional von Neumann
computing architecture incurs a considerable amount of cost to transfer data between
the memory and the processor [1,2]. Among such brain-inspired artificial neural networks, spiking neural networks (SNNs)
have been demonstrated to have an advantage in terms of energy efficiency because
the neuronal units in an SNN are event-driven, i.e., only active when they receive
or emit spikes [3]. Furthermore, it was confirmed that the implementation of an SNN circuit using a
memristor is more efficient than conventional CMOS in terms of energy consumption,
integration density, and simplification of circuits [4-6]. In this case, the memristor is an electrical component and defined as a direct relation
between the magnetic flux and charge [7]. Based on this concept, the resistance of the memristor can be changed when voltage
is applied to the device.
Memristors can be categorized into two types based on the difference in retention
time: nonvolatile and volatile memristors. For nonvolatile memristors, the resistance
state can be maintained even without an external voltage; thus, it is a promising
candidate for synaptic devices in neuromorphic computing and nonvolatile memory applications.
Unlike the nonvolatile memristor, the volatile memristor returns to its initial resistance
state when the external voltage is removed. Because of this volatile property, it
can be used as a selector for crossbar arrays, artificial neurons in neuromorphic
computing, and security applications [5, 8-10].
Recently, volatile memristors have been used to implement neuron nodes, such as integrate-and-fire
(IF), leaky IF (LIF), and Hodgekin-Huxley model, to simplify circuits [11-13]. Volatile memristors have been studied by using various materials and mechanisms,
such as metal-to-insulator transition, ovonic threshold switch, and diffusive memristors
[5]. Among these materials and mechanisms, diffusive memristors have attracted attention
owing to their high nonlinearity and unique temporal conductance evolutionary dynamics.
These devices are mainly operated by the electromigration/out-diffusion of active
metal ions. Active metals, such as Cu and Ag, are present in devices made of metal-dielectric-metal
stacks, where active metals can be used as metal electrodes and/or embedded in dielectric
layers. When a voltage higher than the threshold voltage is applied to the device,
threshold switching occurs with the formation of conductive filaments (CFs) made of
active metal ions in the dielectric layer. When the applied voltage falls below the
hold voltage, the active metal atoms in the CFs diffuse out spontaneously to minimize
their surface energy. Such a self-reset process without an additional reset circuit
can be highly advantageous for implementing an LIF neuron circuit [14].
Recently, we developed an electroforming (EF)-free diffusive memristor by controlling
the doping concentration of Ag in an Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ layer by co-sputtering
[15]. Our observation is that the EF-free device with high Ag concentration showed better
threshold switching performance than that of the EF-needed device in terms of nonlinearity
and off current. EF-free diffusive memristor could be also beneficial compared to
the device with active metal electrode, such as Ag/HfO$_{2}$/Pt, where either EF process
or additional activation process is required [16-18]. In this study, a diffusive memristor based on a Pt/Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$/Pt
device was fabricated, and its volatile switching dynamics were investigated. The
effects of parasitic elements were observed by performing pulse measurements. Based
on the understanding on charging and relaxation characteristics, the LIF neuronal
function was demonstrated by using the device and series resistors. A more simplified
model of an LIF circuit with this diffusive memristor is proposed in this study.
II. METHODS
28-nm-thick Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ switching layer was deposited on a Pt/Ti/SiO$_{2}$/Si
substrate by the co- sputtering of Ag and HfO$_{2}$ targets for 5 min with a sputtering
power of 12 W for Ag and 150 W for HfO$_{2}$.
Fig. 1. Schematics of the (a) co-sputtering system of Ag-doped HfO$_{2}$ layer; (b) Threshold switch device under test (DUT); (c) pulse measurement system.
Fig. 1(a) shows the schematics of the co-sputtering system. The base pressure was set to ~5x10$^{-6}$
Torr, and the process pressure was 10 mTorr. To maintain the Ar plasma, 20 sccm of
Ar gas was let into the chamber. Subsequently, a Pt top electrode was deposited on
an as-deposited Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ switching layer by employing e-beam evaporation
using shadow masks having diameters of 100, 150, and 200~${\mu}$m. A schematic of
the device under test (DUT) of the Pt/Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$/Pt stack is shown
in Fig. 1(b). Electrical tests were performed by using a semiconductor parameter analyzer (SPA;
HP-4155A), an oscilloscope (OSC; TDS-3032B), and a function generator (FG; AFG-3102)
at about 25 ℃. Quasi-DC current-voltage (I-V) threshold switching curves were measured
by using the SPA. Waveforms of the voltage pulse and current passing through the DUT
were measured by using the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 1(c); the input voltage waveform was measured in Ch1 of the OSC and the output current
waveform was measured in Ch2. The impedance of Ch1 and Ch2 was set to 1 M${\Omega}$
to ensure correct measurement of the applied voltage and current across the internal
resistor of the OSC.
Auger electron spectroscopy (AES; XE-100) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS;
PHI 5000 with Al K$_{\mathrm{\alpha }}$) were used for the chemical analysis of the
switching layer.
III. RESULTS
The chemical bonding state and depth elemental profiles of the Ag-HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$
layer were analyzed. Fig. 2(a) and (b) show the XPS spectra of Hf 4f and O 1s from the as-grown HfO$_{2}$ and Ag-doped
HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ layers. It was confirmed that the binding energy of HfO$_{2}$ was
mainly observed. However, there was a shift (~0.5 eV) in the higher binding energy
owing to Ag doping. Fig. 2(c) shows the Ag 3d spectrum, where only metallic Ag bonding is observed in the Ag-doped
HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ layer. Fig. 2(d) shows the AES depth elemental profiles of the switching layer. According to the results,
Ag appears uniformly inside the film. However, there is slightly more Ag distributed
near the surface and bottom interface [15].
Fig. 2. XPS spectra of (a) Hf 4f; (b) O 1s in HfO$_{2}$ (upper panel) and Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ layer (lower panel); (c) Ag 3d spectrum in Ag-doped switching layer; (d) AES depth elemental profiles in Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ layer on Si substrate.
Fig. 3. (a) Typical DC I-V curves; (b) An example of voltage and current waveforms, where rising, width, and falling times of the input pulse are set to 400 ${\mu}$s, 2 ms, and 400 ${\mu}$s, respectively. Normalized voltage and current waveforms are shown for 1-10 V of input voltages with pulse widths of (c) 2.4~ms; (d) 240 ${\mu}$s.
The electrical properties of the Pt/Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$/Pt threshold switch
device were analyzed by applying a DC double sweep (sweep rate of approximately 1-10
V/s) and short voltage pulse. The typical I-V curves of the threshold switch are presented
in Fig. 3(a). Volatile threshold switching characteristics were observed, as previously reported
[15]. The threshold voltage (V$_{\mathrm{th}}$) was approximately 0.8 V, and a large on/off
ratio (>10$^{4}$) was observed. Here, we set the current compliance to 1 ${\mathrm{\mu}}$A
to prevent excessive current flow. It was also a nonpolar switching behavior, indicating
that threshold switching could occur by both bias polarities. Moreover, in this study,
pulse measurements were performed. To confirm the charging/discharging effect of threshold
switching during the pulse rising and falling, the pulse time ratio of rising, width,
and falling was set to 1:5:1. Threshold switching was observed by comparing the input
voltage (black line) and output current (red line) waveforms, as shown in Fig. 3(b). Initially, there was a time delay between the current surge and rising voltage pulse,
where threshold switching occurred over the threshold voltage. When an input voltage
pulse of 8 V was maintained, the output current increased slightly, but the threshold
switching was maintained. When the voltage pulse decreased in the falling period,
the output current slowly decreased, and this is known as the relaxation behavior
due to the out-diffusion of active Ag$^{+}$ ions [6].
To examine the threshold switching behavior as a function of amplitude and pulse time,
an alternating input voltage pulse was applied from 1-10 V with 2.4 ms and 240 ${\mu}$s
of pulse width. Then, the output current was normalized by dividing the current by
the applied voltage value, as shown in Fig. 3(c) and (d). At a relatively low voltage, below 5 V, no threshold switching occurred
but capacitive charging characteristics were observed, as shown in Fig. 3(c). In contrast, at a relatively high voltage, above 5 V, threshold switching and relaxation
were observed. The higher the input voltage, the higher was the current flow during
the pulse input and beginning of relaxation. When the input pulse width decreased
from 2.4 ms to 240 ${\mu}$s, as depicted in Fig. 3(d), the input voltage for the successful threshold switching increased to more than
7 V. In other words, a higher voltage is required with a shorter voltage pulse for
threshold switching owing to the highly nonlinear switching dynamics of ionic motion
[19-21].
Fig. 4. (a) Pulse waveforms of input voltage and output current when the applied voltage is below the threshold switching; (b) Schematic diagram of the device with capacitor (C) and series resistor (R). A volatile memristor is connected in parallel for threshold switching; (c) Fitted results of C and R with different electrode sizes.
To evaluate the capacitive charging characteristics at a relatively low voltage input,
as shown in Fig. 4(a), the parasitic capacitance is considered [22]. As shown in Fig. 4(b), capacitive charging before threshold switching is modeled by using an internal capacitor
and a series resistor. Here, the capacitor and resistor combination is considered
as the device itself with a metal-insulator-metal structure. A volatile memristor
is connected in parallel; however, this is not considered before resistance switching.
No movement of Ag is expected when a low voltage is applied. This is because the internal
parameters were confirmed to remain constant during the pulse application. In the
calculation, devices having electrode diameters of 100 and 200 ${\mu}$m were considered.
First, to calculate the capacitance (C), the differential equation for the voltage
during the pulse rising period (0 < t < t$_{\mathrm{rising}}$) was used as follows.
V$_{S}$ is the source voltage, V$_{C}$ is the voltage applied to the capacitor, and
R+1 is the sum of the resistor and internal resistor impedances of Ch2 (in M${\Omega}$).
Based on the definition of capacitance, V$_{S}$ can be defined as follows.
Here, A is the velocity of the rising pulse. Eq. (2) is solved to derive the following equation:
where, ${\tau}$$_{0}$ is the RC time constant, which is calculated as (R+1)C.
Based on the input pulse period plateau, the output current can be expressed as follows.
I$_{0}$ means the current at the end of rising time. Also, ${\tau}$$_{0}$ was measured
as the time to fall from the I$_{0}$ to I$_{0}$/e. through the measured parameters.
C and R values were calculated for devices having electrode diameters of 100 and 200
${\mu}$m, as shown in Fig. 4(c). It is confirmed that C is directly proportional to the electrode size, whereas R
is inversely proportional. The RC time constant remains at 1 ms even if the electrode
size is different. A relatively larger voltage drop occurs in the device having a
larger electrode than that having a smaller electrode under the same pulse condition.
Accordingly, voltage leakage and integration have a greater effect on the device having
a larger electrode. Comprehensively, it is expected that a device having a larger
electrode will perform better in terms of voltage leak and integration, and this could
be a potential issue in the down-scaling of the device size.
Fig. 5. (a) Example of relaxation time extraction from the output current waveform; (b) Relationship between I$_{\mathrm{r0}}$ and relaxation time.
Fig. 6. (a) Continuous pulse trains of 0.5 (top panel), 0.8 (middle panel), and 1 V (low panel) and their output currents; (b) Waveforms showing the integration and fire of diffusive memristor in (a) 0.8 V; (c) Equivalent LIF circuit containing the diffusive memristor developed in this study.
Fig. 5(a) shows the relaxation behavior after the threshold switching. Because relaxation is
related to the out-diffusion of active ions, the relationship between the initial
current of relaxation (I$_{\mathrm{r0}}$) and relaxation time was determined from
the waveforms. The current decreased exponentially during relaxation, and the relaxation
time was set as the time when I$_{\mathrm{r0}}$ fell below I$_{\mathrm{r0/\mathrm{e}}}$.
Fig. 5(b) shows that I$_{\mathrm{r0}}$ is linearly proportional to the relaxation time. There
is no dependence on the electrode size; therefore, it is considered that the parasitic
capacitor has no effect on the relaxation time. Furthermore, the higher the amplitude
and pulse width, the higher were I$_{\mathrm{r0}}$ and the relaxation time. Therefore,
the amplitude and pulse width of the input voltage can control the size of the conduction
filament and its relaxation [23].
To verify the charging, threshold switching, and relaxation effects of the diffusive
memristor, a continuous voltage pulse train was applied to the device, as shown in
Fig. 6(a). The amplitude of the input pulse was varied between 0.5, 0.8, and 1 V, which is
lower than the threshold voltage of the pulse measurement. The pulse width was set
to 160 ${\mu}$s along the same interval, and 80 pulses were consecutively applied.
In the introduction of 0.5 V pulse trains, no threshold switching was observed, but
capacitive charging characteristics appeared, as presented in the top panel of Fig. 6(a). This is because the applied voltage was not sufficient for the threshold switching.
It was also confirmed that the current saturated when the pulse was continuously applied.
This indicates that charge (integration) occurs during pulse application, and discharge
(leak) occurs during the interval.
Furthermore, integration, threshold switching, and subsequent relaxation were observed
by introducing 0.8~V pulse trains in the middle panel of Fig. 6(a). Specifically, Fig. 6(b) shows the voltage applied to the memristor (V$_{\mathrm{M}}$) and output current
separately under this condition. Before threshold switching, V$_{\mathrm{M}}$ continuously
increased with an increasing number of pulses. In other words, when the pulse train
is applied, the memristor is charged (integration) before switching because of parasitic
capacitance in the device. This means that the voltage is integrated by the internal
capacitance of the device.
Once the voltage charged to the device exceeds the threshold voltage (V$_{\mathrm{M}}$>V$_{\mathrm{th}}$),
threshold switching of the device in HRS to LRS (firing) occurs and the rise of current
can be found. After switching, relaxation process is observed due to the out-diffusion
of Ag ions. Pulse trains are applied during the relaxation, but threshold switching
does not occur immediately. This is because V$_{\mathrm{M}}$ was not yet sufficiently
applied owing to the relaxation effect.
During the relaxation, the device still has a lower resistance compared to R$_{\mathrm{ext}}$,
so that V$_{\mathrm{M}}$ is not enough to switch back to LRS over V$_{\mathrm{th}}$.
Once the relaxation process is completed and the resistance of the device recovered
to HRS, the integration and firing process occurred again by applying the pulse trains.
When 1 V pulse trains were introduced, however, threshold switching was observed but
was not followed by relaxation as shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 6(a). In other words, this device did not return to its high-resistance state. The energy
of the CF was stabilized and maintained in a low-resistance state [23].
Fig. 6(c) shows the simplified LIF neuron circuit with a diffusive memristor. It was confirmed
that the diffusive memristor could act as a capacitor and memristor. The integration
process is related to the charging of the internal capacitor, and threshold switching
above a certain voltage can induce the firing process. It is considered that the timing
of the CF formation and its relaxation is comparable to the charging/discharging of
the internal capacitor. Therefore, it is important to match the input pulse condition
to control the memristor-enabled LIF circuit more precisely.
Lastly, it is concerned that reliability of diffusive memristor can be problematic
in terms of retention and endurance. The devices showed reproducible switching characteristics
up to more than a year. Whereas DC endurance should be further improved. Scalability
of our diffusive memristor was confirmed down to the device with contact-hole diameter
of 120 nm. Both reliability and scalability should be important to realize the LIF
neuron application.
IV. CONCLUSION
In this study, a diffusive memristor with a Pt/Ag-doped HfO$_{\mathrm{x}}$ stack was
fabricated. Volatile threshold switching was analyzed by performing DC and pulse measurements.
A parasitic capacitor and resistor were considered to evaluate the charging characteristics
of the diffusive memristor before its threshold switching. The relaxation behavior
after threshold switching was related to the out-diffusion of the CF (Ag$^{+}$ ions),
which was influenced by the pulse amplitude and width.
Based on the understanding on the charging and relaxation of diffusive memristors,
integration and firing processes were observed by applying continuous pulse trains.
Under proper pulse conditions, an LIF neuronal function can be implemented by using
a single diffusive memristor. Its scalability and controllability are the remaining
issues, but it is highly desirable to simplify the circuit and reduce the energy need
of an LIF neuron.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant
funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1F1A1076232 & 2020M3F3A2A01082324).
This work was also supported by the research grant of the Office of Naval Research
Global under Grant N62909-20-1-2021-P00001 (Memristor-based Neural Network Circuits).
References
Gao L., Chen P. Y., Yu S., Sep. 2017, NbOx based oscillation neuron for neuromorphic
computing, Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 111, No. 10, pp. 103503-undefined
Zidan M. A., Strachan J. P., Lu W. D., Jan. 2018, The future of electronics based
on memristive systems, Nat. Electron., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 22-29
Roy K., Jaiswal A., Panda P., Nov. 2019, Towards spike-based machine intelligence
with neuromorphic computing, Nat., Vol. 575, No. 7784, pp. 607-617
Zhang Y., et al. , Dec. 2018, Highly Compact Artificial Memristive Neuron with Low
Energy Consumption, Small, Vol. 14, No. 51
Wang R., et al. , Sep. 2020, Recent Advances of Volatile Memristors: Devices, Mechanisms,
Applications, Advanced Intelligent Systems, Vol. 2, No. 9, pp. 2000055
Wang Z., et al. , Jan. 2017, Memristors with diffusive dynamics as synaptic emulators
for neuromorphic computing, Nature Materials, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 101-108
Chua L. O., 1971, Memristor-The Missing Circuit Element, EEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUIT
THEORY, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 507
Zhang X., et al. , Dec. 2020, An artificial spiking afferent nerve based on Mott memristors
for neuro-robotics, Nat. Comm., Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 51-undefined
Xia Q., Yang J. J., Apr. 01. 2019, Memristive crossbar arrays for brain-inspired computing,
Nat. Mater., Vol. 18, No. 4. nature publishing group, pp. 309-323
Wang Z., et al. , Feb. 2018, Threshold Switching of Ag or Cu in Dielectrics: Materials,
Mechanism, Applications, Advanced Functional Materials, Vol. 28, No. 6
Tuma T., Pantazi A., le Gallo M., Sebastian A., Eleftheriou E., Aug. 2016, Stochastic
phase-change neurons, Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 11, No. 8, pp. 693-699
Zhang X., et al. , Feb. 2018, An Artificial Neuron Based on a Threshold Switching
Memristor, IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 308-311
Pickett M. D., Medeiros-Ribeiro G., Williams R. S., 2013, A scalable neuristor built
with Mott memristors, Nature Materials, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 114-117
Lee D., et al. , Sep. 2019, Various Threshold Switching Devices for Integrate and
Fire Neuron Applications, Advanced Electronic Materials, Vol. 5, No. 9
Jeong W. H., Han J. H., Choi B. J., 2020, Effect of Ag Concentration Dispersed in
HfOx Thin Films on Threshold Switching, Nanoscale Research Letters, Vol. 15, No. 1
Chekol S. A., Cüppers F., Waser R., Hoffmann-Eifert S., 2021, An Ag/HfO2/Pt Threshold
Switching Device with an Ultra-Low Leakage (< 10 fA), High On/OffRatio (> 1011), and
Low Threshold Voltage (< 0.2 V) for Energy-Efficient Neuromorphic Computing, 2021
IEEE International Memory Workshop (IMW), pp. 1-4
Kim J, Nam K, Chung H, 2014, Improved Uniformity of Resistive Switching Characteristics
in Ag/HfO 2 /Pt ReRAM Device by Microwave Irradiation Treatment, Journal of the Korean
Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 81-84
Grisafe B., Jerry M., Smith J. A., Datta S., Oct. 2019, Performance Enhancement of
Ag/HfO2 Metal Ion Threshold Switch Cross-Point Selectors, in IEEE Electron Device
Letters, Vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 1602-1605
Strukov D. B., Williams R. S., Nov. 2008, Exponential ionic drift: fast switching
and low volatility of thin-film memristors, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Proc., Vol.
94, No. 3, pp. 515-519
Torrezan A. C., Strachan J. P., Medeiros-Ribeiro G., Williams R. S., Dec. 2011, Sub-nanosecond
switching of a tantalum oxide memristor., Nanotechnol., Vol. 22, No. 48, pp. 485203
Menzel S., Waters M., Marchewka A., Böttger U., Dittmann R., Waser R., Dec. 2011,
Origin of the Ultra-nonlinear Switching Kinetics in Oxide-Based Resistive Switches,
Adv. Func. Mater., Vol. 21, No. 23, pp. 4487-4492
Itoh M., Chua L. O., Jun. 2016, Parasitic Effects on Memristor Dynamics, International
Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 26, No. 6
Shukla N., Krishna Ghosh R., Grisafe B., Datta S., 2017, Fundamental mechanism behind
volatile and non-volatile switching in metallic conducting bridge RAM, in IEEE International
Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 87-90
Ju Hwan Park received the B.S. degree in the Department of Materials Science and
Engineering from Seoul National University of Science and Technology (Seoultech),
in 2022. He is currently pursuing the Master degree at the Advanced Nano Electronics
Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoultech. His current
research interests include Neuromorphic devices.
Won Hee Jung received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in the Department of Materials
Science and Engineering from Seoul National University of Science and Technology (Seoultech)
in 2018 and 2020, respectively. In 2020, he joined at Samsung Electronics, where he
has been working in the area of product engineering, specialty in etching process
development of logic product.
Byung Joon Choi received Ph.D. degree from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea,
in 2009. Since then he worked at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA,
as a Postdoctoral Researcher. In 2011, he joined Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Palo
Alto, CA. He has been an Associate Professor at the Department of Materials Science
and Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology (Seoultech) since
2013. His research fields are development of thin film processes applying for next-generation
memory and Neuromorphic devices.