1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
With the increasing use of LED lighting, there is a trend toward simpler semiconductor-based
AC-powered direct-driven products, addressing reliability, cost, and size issues present
in converter-based LEDs[1, 2]. Despite the interest in AC direct drives, voltage fluctuations lead to flicker problems,
resulting in shorter lifetimes of components, including capacitors[3, 4].
Flicker and electrical properties significantly influence LED performance, size, cost,
and applications[1-4]. The former affects human eyes and health, while the latter, including power factor,
total harmonic distortion (THD), and rated power impact efficiency, performance, and
safety[3, 4]. Therefore, international standards and measurement methods have been established[5-8].
Some AC-powered direct-driven lighting exhibit favorable flicker and electrical properties[2]. However, certain low-cost alternatives using low-level circuits fail to meet basic
electrical requirements despite satisfying flicker standards. Others comply with neither
flicker nor electrical requirements yet still reach the market.
Various direct AC-driven technologies have been proposed in developing LED lighting
fixtures, considering issues, such as SMPS cost and quality. However, as standards
on flicker for lighting products become stricter and performance requirements increase,
there is a growing demand for products and technologies that exhibit superior flicker
characteristics. This is essential not only for general lighting but also expansion
into human- centric lighting applications.
Additionally, blinking and cyclical on-off lighting patterns impact light pollution
assessments and cause visual discomfort[9]. High-power home electrical systems, such as induction heaters can induce blinking
phenomena, affecting AC-powered direct-driven lighting products.
1.2 Objectives of the Study
The objective of this study is to find the optimal method for AC-powered direct-driven
lighting products by examining electrical properties, flicker, and blinking to achieve
stable and comfortable lighting. The percent flicker and electrical characteristics
of four market-available AC-powered direct-driven LED lighting devices, as well as
a proposed drive were measured. Each device uses different technology for AC operation.
The relationship between flicker and electrical characteristics was investigated by
comparing and analyzing current waveforms. The blinking phenomena of the proposed
device caused by electrical inductions were also studied.
2. EXPERIMENTS AND DISCUSSION
2.1 Conventional AC Power Drive
Fig. 1 shows a two-channel AC-powered direct-driven LED circuit. This driving method sequentially
operates LEDs in response to the input voltage level. When the input voltage exceeds
VLED1, only LED1 is turned on. When the input voltage surpasses VLED1 + VLED2, both
LED1 and LED2 are activated.
Fig. 1. Conventional AC power-drive circuit
The device operation is illustrated in Fig. 2(a) presents the current flow in the device and the LEDs that light up according to the
input voltage. Fig. 2(b) shows the LEDs that light up in each segment. As there is a segment “0” where all
LEDs are in the off state, the percentage flicker is 100, which is an inferior characteristic.
Fig. 2. LED Illumination characteristics of conventional AC power drive
2.2 Low-flicker AC Power Drive
Fig. 3 illustrates a traditional method, the valley-fill circuit, which is used to improve
the flicker characteristics of AC-powered direct-driven circuits. When the input voltage
is high, the current flows through the red dotted line, charging capacitors C1 and
C2 then turning on the LEDs. When the input voltage is low, the current is supplmented
by power from the capacitors to the LEDs, as depicted with by the blue solid line,
thereby turning on the LEDs. As the capacitors discharge, C1 and C2 operate in parallel,
producing voltage that is less than half the input voltage and consequently, lighting
up only LED1.
Fig. 3. Low-flicker AC power-drive circuit
As shown in Fig. 4(a), although there is no segment where all LEDs are in the off state, the percent flicker
is 33.3% (=(100-50)/(100+50)); in most cases, LED2 has a higher current than LED1,
resulting in a flicker characteristic greater than 40%. Although the low-flicker AC
power-drive method provides improvement compared to the conventional AC power drive
circuit, it does not meet the percentage flicker mandated in the lighting product
market (below 30%). Therefore, further improvements in the flicker characteristics
are required.
Fig. 4. LED Illumination characteristics of a low-flicker AC power drive
2.3 Proposed Very-low-flicker AC Power Drive
Fig. 5 explains the segment-by-segment operation of the proposed very-low-flicker AC power-drive
circuit. The very-low-flicker circuit uses a synchronous-drive IC to control the series
and parallel connections of the LED array. When current is supplied to the LEDs from
the capacitor C1 and the voltage of the capacitor C1 decreases, the synchronous-drive
IC switches the LEDs to parallel, allowing for continued LEDs operatation. Resistors
RSET1 and RSET2 control the current magnitude when the LEDs operate in series and
parallel, ensuring that the current flowing through the LEDs remains constant. Additionally,
a controller is used to constantly control the charging and discharging current of
the capacitor to the desired current level, as depicted in the circuit.
Fig. 5. Segment-by-segment operation of the very-low-flicker AC power-drive circuit
In Segment ⓪, as shown in Fig. 5(a), current is supplied from the capacitor C1 to the LEDs. As the current charged in
the capacitor C1 is supplied to the LEDs, the voltage of the capacitor decreases.
Due to the synchronous drive, even if the voltage drops to LED1, it can still be supplied
to LED2, ensuring that the LEDs operate continuously in Segment ⓪. When current I1
flows, the synchronous-drive IC configures LED1 and LED2 in parallel, allowing the
currents I1 and I2 to flow simultaneously. In Segment ①, as shown in Fig. 5(b), LED1 and LED2 are arranged in parallel, allowing the same current to flow through
both the LEDs simultaneously. In Segment ②, as shown in Fig. 5(c), the LED array is configured in series, allowing the same current to flow through
both LED1 and LED2.
Fig. 6. LED Illumination characteristics of a very-low-flicker AC power drive
Fig. 6(a), shows the LED illumination characteristics when the proposed very-low-flicker AC
power-drive circuit is in operation. The red dashed line represents the current as
viewed from the input side. The controller allows a larger current to flow through
the capacitor, while a consistently low current flows through the LEDs. The excess
current is stored in the capacitor and supplied to the LEDs when the input voltage
decreases. Thus, as shown in Fig. 6(b), consistent LED operation with the same current magnitude across all segments is
ensured. By controlling the capacitor, the LED illumination can be adjusted, achieving
excellent flicker characteristics with smaller capacitors compared to the traditional
low-flicker method.
2.4 Comparison of Characteristics of Different Types of AC Power Drives
Table 1 presents the flicker and electrical characteristics of the linear-bar-type lighting
devices using the three types of AC power-drive circuits mentioned previously. The
samples used in the experiments are shown in Fig. 7.
Sample 1 is a product that uses a conventional AC power-drive method, showing 100%
percent flicker but relatively good electrical characteristics. Sample 2 and Sample
3 use the low-flicker AC power-drive method. Sample 2 shows an improved percent flicker
of 35.6% and relatively good electrical characteristics. In contrast, Sample 3 exhibits
a flicker of 1.32%, indicating excellent flicker characteristics, but very poor electrical
characteristics, requiring caution during daily use. Sample 4 utilizes the proposed
very-low-flicker AC power-drive method, introducing 1.9% percent flicker, 24.6% THD,
and 96.9% power factor. Compared with Sample 3, Sample 4 has a higher power factor
and a lower THD ensuring a similar percent flicker. THD is somewhat higher than that
of Sample 2 because the rectangular waveform has higher-order frequencies compared
to the sinusoidal shape.
Table 1. Measured results of characteristics for different types of AC power drives
No.
|
Percent Flicker
(%)
|
Power Factor
(%)
|
THD
(%)
|
Rated Power Consumption
(W)
|
Measured Power Consumption
(W)
|
Sample 1
|
100
|
96.6
|
14.0
|
11
|
10.7
|
Sample 2
|
35.6
|
99.4
|
10.1
|
10
|
10.1
|
Sample 3
|
1.32
|
56.4
|
128.7
|
30
|
25.9
|
Sample 4
|
1.9
|
96.9
|
24.6
|
25
|
24.6
|
Fig. 7. Samples of linear LED bar modules powered by individual AC direct drives
The current waveforms for the samples are presented in Fig. 8, Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 4 display relatively stable current waveforms resembling
a sinusoidal shape. However, Sample 3 shows a different waveform with an overshoot
in front and descending in the end, and is therefore predicted to be vulnerable to
external electrical shocks.
Fig. 8. Current waveform characteristics of the each sample powered by the individual
AC direct drive
The relation between flicker and electrical characteristics can be summarized as follows:
First, to achieve low flicker values LEDs should always turn on and ripples should
be eliminated by adopting a filter circuit. Second, a sinusoidal waveform gives less
THD than sawtooth or rectangular shape because the former exhibits fewer high-order
frequencies than the latter. Third, decaying waveforms, such as sawtooth forms, should
be avoided as they are susceptible to short pulses having a narrower duration than
the decaying time. Finally, power factor or efficiency can be decreased by adding
more components to provide a lower percent flicker and THD values, sacrificing reliability.
As shown in Fig. 9, when using such AC LED products similar to Sample 3, there is a sharp peak in front
of the ripples, providing a risk of damaging bridge diodes because of the rapid inrush
of a 4-8A current after initially being powered. Note that the first peak has a duration
less than the decay times of the following ripples, so the time constant should be
further optimized. Some products operate in a more unstable state when the current
from the capacitor is fully discharged, leading to a higher inrush of current and
preventing the use of higher capacitance. These products often caution against the
use of more than five identical products connected in series and do not support dimmers.
Additionally, owing to their high total THD, such lighting products can affect other
electrical devices on the same PCB, making them unsuitable for use. Those lighting
products that satisfy only flicker characteristics are the most widely sold due to
low-cost AC power drives in the domestic lighting market. Most of these products use
cheap AC-driver ICs.
Fig. 9. Initial power input waveform for Sample 3 powered by AC power drive
2.5 Analysis of Optical Blinking Phenomenon
To reproduce the optical blinking phenomenon in LED lighting products caused by induction
and similar electrical devices, an experiment was conducted using a 2kW induction
device. Reproducing the optical blinking phenomenon was not straightforward, and only
Sample 1, which exhibited a high percent flicker, showed slightly noticeable blinking.
The other samples did not show any significant blinking phenomenon.
3. CONCLUSION
This study investigated various types of AC-powered direct-drive circuits applied
to linear-bar-type lighting devices and examined their flicker and electrical characteristics
to identify the AC-powered direct-drive types exhibiting superior performance and
functionality.
The proposed circuit demonstrated excellent flicker characteristics along with desirable
electrical properties. Moreover, it was found that selecting lighting products based
solely on flicker characteristics was inadequate. While flicker is an important evaluation
factor for LED lighting, it is also crucial to consider the power factor, THD, and
power consumption simultaneously. With the current trend of requiring the flicker
below 30%, future AC power direct-driven methods must adopt the proposed very-low-flicker
AC power-drive method to achieve flicker levels below 10% and satisfy other electrical-characteristic
requirements, such as the power factor and THD. Based on the tested waveforms, a relation
between the flicker and electrical characteristics was identified. Additionally, the
proposed very-low-flicker AC power-drive method allows the use of much smaller capacitors,
compared to that in the conventional low- flicker AC power-drive methods, enabling
the design and production of LED modules for ultra-slim AC-powered linear-bar lighting
products with thicknesses less than 20mm. This enhances the design flexibility of
LED lighting.
Overall, this study provides valuable insights for the design and selection of AC
power direct-driven LED lighting products with excellent flicker and electrical characteristics,
ultimately contributing to the enhancement of LED lighting performance and user experience.