Optical and Colorimetric Performance Evaluation of a Dual-Channel CCT-Tunable LED
Lighting System for Cyanosis Observation
(Seung-Wan Park)
*iD
(Yu-Rim Kang)
*iD
(Yoon-Chul Lee)
**iD
(Yong Woo Kim)
***iD
(Hyeon Woo Kim)
†iD(Equal contributor)
(Chang-Ju Park)
††iD(Equal contributor)
-
(Researcher, KOPTI, Korea)
-
(Principal Researcher, KOPTI, Korea)
-
(Director, R&D Center, Optoelec Co., Ltd., Korea)
Copyright © 2026 KIIEE All right's reserved
Key words
Color rendering (Ra, Rf, Rf_skin), Cyanosis color-difference index (CCDI), Cyanosis observation, Medical lighting, Tunable correlated color temperature (CCT)
1. Introduction
Cyanosis is a clinical condition characterized by bluish or purplish discoloration
of the skin and mucous membranes due to reduced arterial oxygen saturation and serves
as a critical visual indicator for rapid patient assessment in emergency, respiratory,
and cardiovascular care[1]. Although it can be measured with specialized equipment, visual inspection by medical
personnel remains a vital basis for clinical judgment in emergencies and during initial
consultations[2]. Because the perceived skin color depends strongly on the spectral characteristics
of the lighting, the lighting conditions directly affect detection accuracy; in particular,
the 450–500nm range strongly influences cyanosis contrast[3,
4]. However, hospital wards commonly use conventional white LEDs optimized mainly for
a high General Color Rendering Index (Ra), which may distort skin color perception[5]. To quantify such distortion, the AS/NZS 1680.2.5 standard defines the Cyanosis Observation
Index (COI) with a recommended criterion of 3.3 or lower[6].
Previous studies have largely focused on improving color reproduction and optimizing
spectra for cyanosis observation at specific correlated color temperatures (CCTs)
[7–
9]. Since the 450–500nm region favors cyanosis contrast while the red region favors
natural skin-color reproduction, and warm and cool-white LEDs differ markedly in these
bands, a fixed spectrum cannot simultaneously optimize both. Moreover, the optimal
spectral conditions vary with the patient's condition and observation environment,
so fixed-CCT lighting cannot adequately accommodate diverse clinical situations. These
facts motivate the development of tunable-CCT lighting that actively controls the
spectral power distribution (SPD); LED sources are well suited to such medical lighting
owing to their wavelength selectivity and flexible control of illuminance and CCT[10].
In this study, a dual-channel LED lighting system for cyanosis observation is designed
by combining 3000 K and 5000 K LEDs with distinct spectral characteristics. Using
lookup table (LUT)-based current control, optical and colorimetric performance under
CCT-tunable operation are quantitatively evaluated through an integrated analysis
of color quality metrics—Ra, the Color Fidelity Index (Rf), the Skin Color Fidelity
Index (Rf_skin), and a cyanosis color-difference index (CCDI, the color difference
between normal and cyanotic skin)—together with illuminance and uniformity.
2. System Design
2.1. Design Requirements for Medical Lighting
Medical lighting must provide sufficient and uniformly distributed illuminance. Here,
the average illuminance is defined as the arithmetic mean over the observation plane,
and uniformity is defined as the ratio of minimum to average illuminance on that plane.
EN 12464-1 and KS A 3011 specify at least 200 lx with a uniformity of 0.6 or higher
for hospital wards[11,
12]. The proposed system is intended as ceiling-mounted lighting for general wards and
inpatient observation rather than for high-illuminance treatment or emergency use;
its design parameters were therefore set to meet general-ward requirements across
the entire tunable CCT range, while higher levels may be required in environments
such as emergency or treatment rooms. To ensure accurate perception of skin and mucous
membrane color changes, an Ra of 90 or higher was adopted as the baseline. Ra, Rf,
and Rf_skin were used to assess general color rendering, color fidelity, and skin-color
reproduction, respectively, with Rf and Rf_skin evaluated by the ANSI/IES TM-30 method[13]. In addition, cyanosis observation performance was assessed using the CIEDE2000-based
CCDI, which quantifies the perceptual difference between normal and cyanotic skin
rather than applying the fixed COI threshold of the AS/NZS standard.
2.2. Spectral and Color Characteristics of LED Light Sources
The Luminus MP-3030-21C2 LED package was employed in this research. The main specifications
of the LED package, including package size, nominal CCT, Color Rendering Index (CRI),
and relevant optical characteristics, are summarized in Table 1, which is based on the manufacturer’s datasheet[14].
Table 1. Main specifications of the LED light source used in this study
|
Item
|
Specification
|
|
Manufacturer
|
Luminus Devices
|
|
Model
|
MP-3030-21C2
|
|
Package type
|
3030 SMD LED
|
|
Package size
|
3.0 mm × 3.0 mm
|
|
Nominal CCT
|
3000 K / 5000 K
|
|
CRI
|
≥ 90
|
|
Major spectral feature
|
3000 K: red region dominant / 5000 K: blue–cyan region dominant
|
To implement the dual-channel configuration, 3000 K and 5000 K LEDs were utilized
as they exhibit distinct spectral characteristics. The selected LED package provides
high color rendering performance (CRI ≥ 90) and broad spectral characteristics, which
are important for perceiving subtle color changes in the skin and mucous membrane.
Fig. 1. Chromaticity coordinates and spectral power distributions of 3000 K and 5000
K LED light sources
Fig. 1 illustrates the CIE color coordinates and SPDs of the two LEDs. The 3000 K LED exhibits
high radiant intensity near 630nm, emphasizing the red spectral region. In contrast,
the 5000 K LED shows pronounced spectral components around 450nm and 490nm, highlighting
the blue–cyan spectral range.
Specifically, in the 450–500nm range, the radiant intensity of the 5000 K LED is approximately
2 to 3 times higher than that of the 3000 K LED, which contributes to enhancing the
reflection contrast between oxygenated and deoxygenated blood. Conversely, the 3000
K LED shows a relatively high radiant intensity in the red spectral region, making
it advantageous for reproducing the red components of the skin and mucous membrane.
Table 2 summarizes the color quality metrics for the two LEDs. The measured CCTs were 2991
K and 4827 K, respectively, which are close to the target CCTs. Furthermore, the Ra
of both light sources satisfies the standards for medical lighting, and the Rf and
Rf_skin also exhibit similar levels.
Table 2. Optical and color quality metrics of the 3000 K and 5000 K LEDs
|
Target CCT (K)
|
Measured CCT (K)
|
Ra
|
Rf
|
Rf_skin
|
|
3000
|
2991
|
93.9
|
88.3
|
90.4
|
|
5000
|
4827
|
93.2
|
91.2
|
94.6
|
As such, the two light sources exhibit complementary spectral characteristics in the
blue–cyan and red regions. Their combined operation provides a foundation for supporting
both cyanosis contrast perception and skin color reproduction across the tunable CCT
range.
2.3. Dual-Channel LED Panel Design
Fig. 2 illustrates the dual-channel LED panel and the simulation configuration. The proposed
light source is designed with a panel structure of 594mm × 594mm × 31mm and consists
of a total of 140 LEDs.
Fig. 2. Configuration of the dual-channel LED panel and simulation setup, including
panel dimensions, LED array (3000 K and 5000 K), and observation plane geometry
The optical and electrical characteristics of the dual-channel LED panel, based on
the MP-3030-21C2 LED package, are summarized in Table 3. The LED package specifications were obtained from the manufacturer’s datasheet[14], and the panel-level driving conditions were determined based on the LUT-based current
control used in the simulation.
Table 3. Optical and electrical characteristics of the dual-channel LED panel based
on the MP-3030-21C2 LED package
|
Item
|
3000 K channel
|
5000 K channel
|
Condition
|
|
Typical luminous flux
|
33lm
|
38lm
|
If = 45mA, Tc = 25°C
|
|
Forward voltage
|
5.3 V
|
Typ., If = 45mA
|
|
Reference current
|
45 mA
|
Tc = 25°C
|
|
Maximum forward current
|
120 mA
|
|
Maximum power dissipation
|
0.8 W
|
|
Calculated luminous efficacy
|
138lm/W
|
159lm/W
|
Calculated at If = 45mA
|
|
Number of LEDs
|
70 LEDs
|
70 LEDs
|
Total 140 LEDs
|
|
Channel driving current range
|
0–1286mA
|
0–1054mA
|
LUT-based control
|
The 3000 K and 5000 K LEDs are arranged in an alternating pattern to ensure uniform
distribution across the panel surface. This layout is intended to achieve illuminance
uniformity through the spatial mixing of the two light sources during tunable CCT
operation. The same configuration is applied as the simulation conditions for the
subsequent optical performance evaluation, where the observation plane is defined
as a 2.12m × 2.12m area located 2m below the panel.
2.4. Lookup Table (LUT)-Based CCT Control and Current Configuration
Table 4 presents the LUT summarizing the driving currents for the 3000 K and 5000 K channels
according to the target CCT, along with the resulting simulated CCT and the corresponding
error (ΔCCT).
Table 4. LUT-based channel currents, simulated CCT, and CCT deviation for target correlated
color temperatures. ΔCCT was calculated as the simulated CCT minus the target CCT
|
Target CCT (K)
|
LED current (mA)
|
Simulated CCT (K)
|
ΔCCT (K)
|
|
3000 K
|
5000 K
|
|
3000
|
1286
|
0
|
3090
|
90
|
|
3200
|
1163
|
101
|
3216
|
16
|
|
3500
|
866
|
345
|
3540
|
40
|
|
3800
|
615
|
550
|
3846
|
46
|
|
4000
|
469
|
669
|
4041
|
41
|
|
4200
|
368
|
747
|
4184
|
-16
|
|
4300
|
276
|
828
|
4328
|
28
|
|
4500
|
180
|
910
|
4485
|
-15
|
|
4600
|
108
|
966
|
4612
|
12
|
|
4800
|
32
|
1043
|
4753
|
-47
|
|
5000
|
0
|
1054
|
4815
|
-185
|
As the CCT increases, the driving current for the 3000 K channel decreases from 1286mA
to 0mA, while the current for the 5000 K channel increases from 0mA to 1054mA. In
the intermediate CCT range, both channels are driven simultaneously; for example,
at a target CCT of 4000 K, the current is distributed as 469mA and 669mA for each
channel, respectively. The simulated CCT exhibits an error ranging from -185 K to
+90 K relative to the target values, which corresponds to a relative error of 0.26–
3.7%. This LUT-based current control was implemented to compensate for the nonlinear
spectral mixing characteristics associated with CCT variations and to achieve stable
operation across a wide CCT range.
3. Optical Performance Evaluation
3.1. Illuminance Distribution and Uniformity Characteristics
Optical performance evaluation was performed using LightTools ray-tracing analysis
based on the simulation conditions presented in Fig. 2. The luminous intensity characteristics and SPDs of the LEDs were based on datasheet
values, and the light output for each CCT condition was calculated by reflecting the
LUT-based current settings from Table 4.
Fig. 3 shows the ray-tracing results, luminous intensity distribution, and illuminance distribution
at the 4000 K condition. The luminous intensity distribution exhibits a diffusive
characteristic of 113°; consequently, the emitted rays are distributed across the
entire observation plane. The illuminance distribution on the observation plane shows
high values at the center and decreases towards the periphery.
Fig. 3. Ray-tracing visualization, angular light distribution, and spatial illuminance
distribution of the dual-channel LED module at 4000 K on the observation plane
Fig. 4 illustrates the variations in average illuminance and uniformity across the entire
target CCT range (3000–5000 K) based on the LUT. The average illuminance is maintained
within the range of 215.2–224.1lx, exhibiting a variation of 4.06% throughout the
CCT range. Uniformity is maintained between 0.754 and 0.760, showing a minimal variation
of 0.79%. This indicates that the light output and spatial distribution are stably
preserved as the currents of the two channels are complementarily adjusted in response
to CCT changes.
Fig. 4. Average illuminance and uniformity as a function of correlated color temperature
(CCT) under LUT-based current control
In addition, the optical performance values at representative CCT conditions (3000
K, 4000 K, and 5000 K) are summarized in Table 5. The average illuminance was calculated at 215lx, 223lx, and 215lx, respectively,
satisfying the hospital lighting requirement of 200lx or higher. The uniformity ranged
from 0.754 to 0.760, exceeding the 0.6 criterion specified by EN 12464-1 and KS A
3011.
Table 5. Summary of optical performance at representative CCT conditions
|
Target CCT (K)
|
Average illuminance (lx)
|
Max (lx)
|
Min (lx)
|
Uniformity
|
|
3000
|
215
|
273
|
162
|
0.754
|
|
4000
|
223
|
283
|
170
|
0.759
|
|
5000
|
215
|
277
|
162
|
0.755
|
|
Requirements
|
≥200
|
-
|
-
|
≥0.6
|
3.2. Evaluation of Color Quality and Cyanosis Observation Performance
Fig. 5 shows the variations in the color quality metrics and the CCDI across the tunable
CCT range.
Fig. 5. Variation of color quality indices (Ra, Rf, Rf_skin) and the cyanosis color-difference
index (CCDI) as a function of correlated color temperature (CCT) under LUT-based current
control
Rather than computing the AS/NZS COI directly, a CIEDE2000-based CCDI was designated
to quantify how perceptibly cyanotic skin differs from normal skin under each test
SPD. The spectral reflectances of normal (oxygenated) and cyanotic (deoxygenated)
skin were generated with a single-layer Kubelka–Munk model[3,
4] over 400–700nm at 5nm intervals. The absorption coefficient combined hemoglobin (oxygenated
and deoxygenated molar extinction from Prahl[15]; blood volume fraction 8%, oxygen saturation 98% for normal and 70% for cyanotic
skin), melanin (3%), and a baseline tissue term following Jacques[3], with a skin reduced-scattering power law[3]; the diffuse reflectance followed the Kubelka–Munk relation. For each SPD, both skin
conditions were rendered under the same illuminant (no external reference), and the
CIEDE2000 difference between them was computed[16]:
where Lab_normal and Lab_cyanotic are the CIELAB coordinates of the modeled normal
and cyanotic skin under the test SPD. A larger CCDI indicates a greater perceptual
difference, i.e., more readily observable cyanosis; unlike the AS/NZS COI (lower =
less distortion), it is a contrast measure for which larger values are favorable,
so the 3.3 criterion does not apply.
Under tunable operation, Ra, Rf, and Rf_skin remained stable, with variations of 1.6%
(92.3–93.8), 0.81% (89.5–90.2), and 2.16% (91.3–93.3), respectively. The CCDI increased
monotonically from 0.86 at 3000 K to 1.54 at 5000 K, indicating that cyanosis is least
perceptible at 3000 K and most at 5000 K, consistent with the higher 450–500 nm content
of the 5000 K channel. Conversely, skin redness a* (evaluated against each SPD’s own
white point) decreased from 15.4 to 12.4, indicating more natural skin-color reproduction
at a lower CCT. Since the two move in opposite directions, no single fixed CCT maximizes
both; the dual-channel tunable configuration—combining the cyanosis-contrast advantage
of the 5000 K channel with the skin-color advantage of the 3000 K channel—lets the
operator select the CCT best suited to each clinical situation. Table 6 summarizes the representative results.
Table 6. Summary of color quality indices, CCDI (ΔE₀₀), and skin redness a* for 3000
K, 4000 K, and 5000 K
|
Target CCT (K)
|
Ra
|
Rf
|
Rf_skin
|
CCDI (ΔE₀₀)
|
a*_normal
|
|
3000
|
93.8
|
89.6
|
91.5
|
0.86
|
15.4
|
|
4000
|
93.0
|
89.5
|
91.3
|
1.27
|
13.7
|
|
5000
|
92.3
|
90.2
|
93.3
|
1.54
|
12.4
|
|
Requirements
|
≥90
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
To relate the LED sources to the panel-level simulation, the measured color quality
indices were compared with the simulated values at representative CCTs (Table 7).
Table 7. Comparison between measured LED source characteristics and simulated LED
panel performance
|
Target CCT (K)
|
Metric
|
Measured LED source
|
Simulated LED panel
|
|
3000
|
CCT (K)
|
2991
|
3090
|
|
Ra
|
93.9
|
93.8
|
|
Rf
|
88.3
|
89.6
|
|
Rf_skin
|
90.4
|
91.5
|
|
5000
|
CCT (K)
|
4827
|
4815
|
|
Ra
|
93.2
|
92.3
|
|
Rf
|
91.2
|
90.2
|
|
Rf_skin
|
94.6
|
93.3
|
The measured and simulated Ra, Rf, and Rf_skin agreed closely at both 3000 K and 5000
K, indicating that the source characteristics were well reflected in the panellevel
simulation and that the proposed tunable system can flexibly select CCT through active
SPD control.
4. Conclusion
In this study, a dual-channel CCT-tunable LED lighting system for cyanosis observation
was designed and evaluated through simulation. LUT-based current control of combined
3000 K and 5000 K LEDs achieved continuous CCT variation over the entire range.
Across the full range, the average illuminance (215.2–224.1lx) and uniformity (0.754–0.760)
satisfied the hospital requirements of ≥200lx and ≥0.6, with variations limited to
4.06% and 0.79%, respectively, confirming stable light output and spatial distribution.
Color quality also remained stable (Ra 92.3–93.8, with steady Rf and Rf_skin), preserving
skin and mucous-membrane color reproduction despite CCT variation.
The CIEDE2000-based CCDI increased monotonically from 0.86 (3000 K) to 1.54 (5000
K), indicating greater cyanosis perceptibility at higher CCT—consistent with the stronger
450–500nm emission of the 5000 K channel—whereas skin redness a* decreased from 15.4
to 12.4. Because these two requirements are favored at opposite ends of the range,
the tunable dual-channel design allows the appropriate CCT to be selected depending
on the clinical situation. As the CCDI is a simulation-based relative measure rather
than the AS/NZS COI, it does not by itself establish clinical effectiveness; experimental
validation, together with comparisons against various LED spectra and conventional
hospital lighting, remains as future work.
Overall, the proposed system maintains stable optical and colorimetric performance
under tunable CCT operation, indicating its potential for LED-based medical lighting.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (No. 2410015585, Development
and demonstration of high color light ICT lighting system with cyanosis diagnosis
and sterilization to enter the global market) funded By the Ministry of Trade, Industry
and Resources (MOTIR, Korea)
References
M. Changizi, K. Rio, "Harnessing color vision for visual oximetry in central cyanosis",
Medical Hypotheses, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 87-91, 2010.

S. M. McMullen, W. Patrick, "Cyanosis", The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 126,
no. 3, pp. 210-212, 2013.

S. L. Jacques, "Optical properties of biological tissues: A review", Physics in Medicine
& Biology, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. R37-R61, 2013.

V. V. Tuchin, Tissue optics: Light scattering methods and instruments for medical
diagnosis, SPIE Press, 2015, 3rd ed..

Y. Ohno, "Color rendering and luminous efficacy of white LED spectra", Proc. of SPIE,
Fourth International Conference on Solid State Lighting, vol. 5530, pp. 88-98, 2004.

Standards Australia, AS/NZS 1680.2.5:1997 interior lighting-hospital and medical tasks,
1997.

Y. Ohno, "Spectral design considerations for white LED color rendering", Optical Engineering,
vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 111302-1-111302-9, 2005.

D. Durmus, "Spectral optimization of solid-state light sources for cyanosis observation
index, circadian, and color metrics", OSA Advanced Photonics Congress 2021, 2021,
paper PvM4D.4.

H.-S. Jo, D.-H. Kim, U.-C. Ryu, "Study on variations of optical characteristics according
to combination of white and red LED spectra", Proc. of KIIEE Spring Conference, pp.
101, 2017.

M.-J. You, S.-K. Hong, A.-S. Choi, "A preliminary study on the lighting design of
hospitals for LED lighting application", KIIEE, pp. 1-10, 2011.

European Committee for Standardization(CEN), EN 12464-1:2021 lighting of workplaces
– Indoor, 2021.

Korean Agency for Technology and Standards(KATS), KS A 3011: Lighting standard, 2023.

Illuminating Engineering Society (IES), ANSI/IES TM-30-20: IES method for evaluating
light source color rendition, 2020.

Luminus Devices, MP-3030-21C2 LED datasheet, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://download.luminus.com/datasheets/Luminus_MP3030_21C2_Datasheet.pdf
(Accessed: May 19, 2026).

S. Prahl, Optical absorption of hemoglobin, Oregon Medical Laser Center, [Online].
Available: https://omlc.org/spectra/hemoglobin/ (Accessed: May 19, 2026).

G. Sharma, W. Wu, E. N. Dalal, "The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation
notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations", Color Research & Application,
vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 21-30, 2005.

Biography
He received his B.S. degree from the School of Optical Engineering, Chosun University,
Gwangju, South Korea, in Feb. 2023. He is a research engineer at the Korea Photonics
Technology Institute, specializing in Design and Development of Mobility Convergence
Product Lighting Optics. He is interested in mobility lighting systems.
She received her M.S. degree from the School of Mechanical System Engineering, Chosun
University, Gwangju, South Korea, in Feb. 2023. She is a researcher at the Korea Photonics
Technology Institute, specializing in thermal design and the analysis of mobility
convergence products. She is interested in thermal management systems.
He completed his Ph.D. coursework in Physics at Chonnam National University, Gwangju,
South Korea, in Feb. 2013. He is a Principal Research Engineer at the Korea Photonics
Technology Institute, specializing in optic system design. He is interested in mobility
lighting systems and Human-Central Lighting.
He received his M.E. degree in Optical Engineering from Sejong University, Seoul,
South Korea, in August 2003. He is currently a Director with Optoelec Co., Ltd., specializing
in R&D of wafer-level optics and various applied optical solutions. He is interested
in Micro & Nano optics and advanced lighting systems.
He is a researcher specializing in urology and biomedical engineering. He holds an
M.D. from Pusan National University School of Medicine (2008) and obtained Ph.D. degrees
from the Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science
and Technology, Korea (2017) and Pusan National University School of Medicine (2025).
His research focuses on functional urology, endourology, and medical device development,
aimed at bridging the gap between engineering technology and clinical applications.
He is a researcher specializing in optical sensors and actuators. He received his
Ph.D. in Medical System Engineering from the Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology
(GIST), Gwangju, Republic of Korea, in August 2016. His research interests include
optical and spectroscopic sensing technologies, as well as bio-medical systems.