Do Kyoung-Il1
Koo Yong-Seo1*
-
(Dept. of Electronics and Electrical Eng,. Dankook University)
Copyright © The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers(IEIE)
Index Terms
Dual-emitter, high current driving capability, lateral insulated gate bipolar transistor (LIGBT), silicon carbide (SiC)
I. INTRODUCTION
Silicon carbide (SiC) is one of the wide band gap semiconductors for achieving high
critical electric fields, high thermal conductivity and high saturated electron drift
velocity (1-3). 4H-SiC devices have been considered superior replacements for existing silicon technologies
(4,5). On the research level, much research has been conducted on the design and integration
of driver circuits together with the 4H-SiC power devices in a power converter system
(6-8). And 4H-SiC devices will make power electronic systems compatible with high temperature
environments. The insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) has become a popular switching
device in electronic power applications. On-resistance of the lateral IGBT is smaller
than that of a lateral MOSFET, implying partial conductivity modulation in the N-epitaxial
layer (9,10). It combines the good features of both bipolar and MOSFET structures. Therefore,
the 4H-SiC LIGBT is a promising power device for use in high voltage power integrated
circuit applications, due not only to its superior isolation performance but also
to the good characteristics of lateral power devices. Many of the advantageous characteristics
of the 4H-SiC LIGBT device, such as high frequency, improved efficiency, and high-temperature
operation, have been reported (11). In addition, applications exist that require the monolithic integration of high
voltage and low voltage devices, and in these cases, lateral high-voltage devices
are reasonable options. For this reason, 4H-SiC lateral devices have been extensively
studied in the past (12). The purpose of this paper is to describe a 4H-SiC LIGBT with dual-emitter structure,
which has improved forward voltage drop, on-resistance and current driving capabilities
compared to the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT.
II. DEVICE DESCRIPTION
The cross-section of the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT and dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT are
shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b), respectively. Fig. 2 show the proposed dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT equivalent circuit. The dual-emitter
4H-SiC LIGBT structure is identical to the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT structure except
it has an additional emitter region.
Fig. 1. Cross sectional view of (a) the conventional 4H-SIC LIGBT (b) and the proposed
dual-emitter 4H-SIC LIGBT.
Fig. 2. The proposed dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT equivalent circuit.
Fig. 3 show the layout of the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT and dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT. These
devices were fabricated on the N-epitaxial layer on top of the Si face of a 4H-SiC
wafer. Both devices have the same geometry, which is $L_{ch}$ = 1 µm, Ln-drift = 16
µm, gate oxide thickness = 500 Å and W = 223 µm. The drift region was formed through
the N-epitaxial layer. The N-type emitter and the P-type collector were formed by
implanting nitrogen and aluminum, respectively. Generally, in order to form the N-type
emitter in 4H-SiC, nitrogen is used rather than phosphorous because of the higher
ionization energy and lower atomic weight. Thus it is possible to spread more quickly
board deeper in substrate.
Fig. 3. The layout the layout of (a) the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT, (b) dual-emitter
4H-SiC LIGBT.
Thickness and doping concentration of the P+ layer are approximately 0.2 µm and 3E18
cm$^{-3}$ and for the N+ layer are 0.2 µm and 5E18 cm$^{-3}$, respectively. The thickness
and doping concentration of the P-well layer are 0.7 µm and 1E18 cm$^{-3}$, respectively.
The process step for the N+ implant and P+ implant were carried out at 650 °C using
a nitrogen and aluminum source, respectively. And, Silicide metal processing method
to form ohmic contact such as N + and P +, silicide process includes using Ni metal
was used Th. = 800 ~ 1000Å was Deposition in DC sputter method, silicide is formed
1050 °C for 30s heat treatment in an environment using an RTP process equipment. Also,
the P-well step was carried out at 650°C using an aluminum source. The punch through
problem between the P-well bottom and N+ substrate did not occur because of a sufficiently
high saturation of the P-well concentration. Fig. 4 shows magnified image of the fabricated proposed LIGBT. The properties of the device
are summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 4. Magnified image of the fabricated proposed dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT.
Table 1. Summarized doping concentration and depth of layer
Layer
|
Junction
Depth
|
Doping
concentration
|
N-epitaxial layer
|
12 μm
|
7E15 cm$^{-3}$
|
N+ Implant
|
0.2 μm
|
5E18 cm$^{-3}$
|
P+ Implant
|
0.2 μm
|
3E18 cm$^{-3}$
|
P-well Implant
|
0.7 μm
|
1E18 cm$^{-3}$
|
The operating mechanism in the dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT is the same as in the conventional
4H-SiC LIGBT; the operating system involves the injection of high density holes from
the collector into the additional emitter. Forward current did not occur in the minority
carrier recombination due to the shorter length of the low doped N-epitaxial layer
than the minority carrier diffusion length. The increased electron current from the
additional emitter decreased the on-state voltage drop due to the conductivity modulation.
Also, the dual-emitter LIGBT has a higher current density (768 mA) than the conventional
LIGBT (128 mA) at the collector voltage of 20 V, due to its additional emitter region.
As a results the dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT has a lower on-state voltage drop (0.86
Ω) than the conventional LIGBT (6.67 Ω) (13,14).
III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Fig. 5. (a) Measured on-state characteristics of the 4H-SiC conventional LIGBT and
proposed LIGBT for gate bias 15 V, 20 V, (b) comparison of the on-state voltage drop
when the gate bias is 20 V.
Fig. 6. Measured electron and hole mobility of the 4H-SiC conventional LIGBT and proposed
LIGBT with varying channel length.
The electrical characteristics of the dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT and conventional 4H-SiC
LIGBT were investigated by using the 4145 semiconductor parameter analyzer and 370A
curve tracer. Fig. 5(a) shows the on-state characteristics of conventional LIGBT and dual-emitter LIGBT.
Both devices have the same geometry. The knee voltage is about 4 V due to high concentration
of the P-well. The collector driving current of the 4H-SiC dual-emitter LIGBT is above
18 mA when the gate bias and collector bias are at 20 V, which is nearly six times
higher than that in the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT.
Fig. 5(b) shows a comparison of the on-state characteristics when the gate bias is 20 V. The
on-state voltage drop of the dual-emitter LIGBT is 7.5 V at the collector current
of 1 mA, which is lower than that of the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT. Thus, the dual-emitter
LIGBT improves the on-state voltage drop by about 22%. The dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT
contains an additional emitter, and has a higher electron and hole mobility than the
conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT. The dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT has a higher electron/hole
current (IE/IH) than the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT, due to the increase in the electron
and hole mobility. Fig. 6 shows a comparison of the electron and hole mobility simulation characteristics with
changing channel length. The on-state voltage drop, $V_{CE}$ is the sum of the emitter-base
voltage drop ($V_{EB}$) of the PNP transistor and the collector-base voltage drop
across this transistor ($V_{CB}$), or
The voltage, $V_{CB}$, is the drain-source voltage ($V_{DS}$) across the MOSFET. Because
IB= IMOSFET and the MOSFET operates in the linear region, we obtain
where,
$C_{OX}$ is the oxide capacitance per unit area, $μ_{s}$ represents the surface electron
mobility, $Z$ is the channel width, and $L_{ch}$ is the channel length. Thus, the
LIGBT on-state voltage ($V_{CE}$) is explicitly expressed in terms of the collector-emitter
current, $I_{CE}$ = $I_{B}$ + $I_{C}$, and gate voltage, $V_{GE}$ = $V_{GS}$, assuming
$V_{GB}$ = 0. The equation for $V_{CE}$ is another initial condition necessary for
studying the switching transient (15). As the dual-emitter LIGBT has two N-channels due to the additional emitter region,
the value of ($Z$/$L_{ch}$) is increased and $V_{CB}$ becomes smaller due to the larger
$K$ value. Therefore, the voltage drop, $V_{CE}$, is decreased and the increasing
electron injection into the N-drift region enhances conductivity modulation. As more
electron current is injected, more hole current is injected from the collector to
the N-drift region in order to maintain charge neutrality. Therefore, the proposed
dual-emitter LIGBT has a higher on-state current capability and a lower on-state voltage
drop than the conventional LIGBT. The on-resistance, shown in Fig. 7, is about seven times higher. Fig. 7 shows the collector saturation current $I_{c,sat}$ and saturation trans conductance
$g_{m,sat}$ as a function of the gate bias when $V_{CE}$=30 V. The threshold voltage
is 5 V. When the gate voltage is 20 V, the conventional LIGBT has a saturation current
of 3.8 mA and $g_{m}$ of 0.09 mS. On the other hands, the dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT
has a saturation current of 23.5 mA and $g_{m}$ of 0.58 mS which is nearly six times
higher than in the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT. This is because the conductivity. Fig. 8 shows the breakdown voltage for drift lengths of 8 µm, 11 µm, 13 µm, and 16 µm and
analyzes the differences between two structures when the breakdown voltage is the
largest at 16 µm drift length.
Fig. 7. (a) Collector current, (b) $g_{m}$ as a function of the gate bias for the
conventional LIGBT and the proposed dual-emitter LIGBT when $V_{CE}$ = 30 V.
Fig. 8. Breakdown voltage characteristics of the conventional LIGBT and the proposed
dual-emitter LIGBT for drift lengths of 8 µm, 11 µm, 13 µm, 16 µm (a) Leaner scale,
(b) Log scale.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
This paper compares a dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT to the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT.
The dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT leads to a significant improvement in on-state performance.
The additional emitter between the collector and gate regions in the dual-emitter
4H-SiC LIGBT provides an additional current path that leads to a lower on-state voltage
drop, and higher current density than a conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT. In terms of the
on-state voltage drop, the dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT has superior electrical characteristics
when compared to the conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT. Experimental results show that the
dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT has a saturation current of 23.5 mA and $g_{m}$ of 0.58
mS, which is nearly six times higher than that of a conventional 4H-SiC LIGBT. Furthermore,
the off-state characteristic of the dual-emitter 4H-SiC LIGBT and conventional 4H-SiC
LIGBT are equal to 250 V.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology(KEIT)
grant funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (20009213, “High efficiency
High Voltage Smart Ceramic Speaker Driver SoC for Bezelless Smart phones”) and the
MSIT(Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC(Information Technology Research
Center) support program(IITP-2018-0-01421) supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information
& communications Technology Promotion)
REFERENCES
Fujihira T., Miyasaka Y., 1998 [, Simulated superior performances of semiconductor
superjunction devices, Proc. 10th Int. Symp. Power Semicond. Devices ICs. ISPSD’98
(IEEE Cat. No.98CH36212), No. V, pp. 423-426
Ji S., Zhang Z., Wang F., 2017, Overview of high voltage sic power semiconductor devices:
development and application, CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst., Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 254-264
Do K.I., Lee B.S., Koo Y.S., 2018, Study on 4H-SiC GGNMOS Based ESD Protection Circuit
With Low Trigger Voltage Using Gate-Body Floating Technique for 70-V Applications,
IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 283-286
Merkert A., Krone T., Mertens A., 2013, Characterization and Scalable Modeling of
Power Semiconductors for Optimized Design of Traction Inverters with Si- and SiC-Devices,
IEEE Trans. Power Electron., Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 2238-2245
She X., Huang A. Q., Lucia O., Ozpineci B., 2017, Review of Silicon Carbide Power
Devices and Their Applications, IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics, Vol. 64, No. 10,
pp. 8193-8205
Kargarrazi S., Lanni L., Rusu A., Zetterling C.-M., 2015, A monolithic SiC drive circuit
for SiC Power BJTs, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Power Semiconductor
Devices and ICs, Vol. 2015-June, pp. 285-288
Ericson N., Frank S., Britton C., Marlino L., Ryu S. H., Grider D., Mantooth A., Francis
M., Lamichhane R., Mudholkar M., Shepherd P., Glover M., Valle-Mayorga J., McNutt
T., Barkley A., Whitaker B., Cole Z., Passmore B., Lostetter A., 2014, A 4H silicon
carbide gate buffer for integrated power systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 539-542
Lamichhane R. R., Ericsson N., Frank S., Britton C., Marlino L., Mantooth A., Francis
M., Shepherd P., Glover M., Perez S., McNutt T., Whitaker B., Cole Z., 2014, A wide
bandgap silicon carbide (SiC) gate driver for high-temperature and high-voltage applications,
Proceedings of the International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices and ICs,
pp. 414-417
Crisafulli Vittorio, 2017, High Efficiency and ruggedness intelligent IGBT technology
for EV/HEV, PCIM Europe 2017, Nuremberg, Germany
Do K.I., Lee B.S., 2019, LIGBT-based ESD Protection Device with High Holding Voltage
for 15 V Power IC Applications, Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, Vol.
19, No. 5, pp. 470-476
Cooper Jr. J. A., Agarwal A., 2002, SiC powerswitching devices-the second electronics
revolution?, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 90, No. 6, pp. 956968
Spitz J., Melloch M. R., Cooper J. A., Capano M. A., 1998, 2.6Kv 4H-SiC lateral DMOSFETs,
IEEE Electron Device Lett., Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 100102
Huang C., Kuo J., Tsai C., 2008, High voltage (3130 V) 4H-SiC lateral p-n diodes on
a semiinsulating substrate, IEEE Electron Device Lett., Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 83-85
Lee W., Chu K., Huang C., Lee L., Tasi M., Lee K., Zhao F., 2012, Design and fabrication
of 4H-SiC lateral high-voltage devices on a semi-insulating substrate, IEEE Transaction
on Electron Devices, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 754-760
Khanna Khanna, (2003, Aug), IGBT Theory and design. (1st ed.)
Author
Kyoung-Il Do was born in Seoul,
Republic of Korea, in 1989.
He was
M.S and PhD.-course since 2016 in
Electronics and Electrical Engineering,
Dankook University.
His
current research interests include
electrostatic discharge (ESD)
protection circuit design and semiconductor devices,
such as power BJTs, LDMOSs, and IGBTs; and
electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection circuit design.
Yong-Seo Koo was born in Seoul,
Republic of Korea, in 1957.
He
received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. in
Electronic Engineering from Sogang
University, Seoul, Republic of Korea,
in 1981, 1983 and 1992, respectively.
He joined the Department of
Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dankook
University as a Professor, in 2009.
His current research
interests include semiconductor devices, such as power
BJTs, LDMOSs, and IGBTs; high-efficiency power
management integrated circuits (PMICs), such as DC-DC
converters; and electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection
circuit design.