III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fig. 2(a) and (b) display the time dependencies of the transfer curves measured at V$_{\mathrm{DS}}$
= 0.1 V under SHS for IGZO TFTs with W/L = 30/5 and 50/5 ${\mu}$m, respectively, while
Fig. 2(c) and (d) respectively display the transconductances (g$_{\mathrm{m}}$ = ${\mu}$$_{\mathrm{FE}}$${\cdot}$C$_{\mathrm{OX}}$${\cdot}$V$_{\mathrm{DS}}$${\cdot}$W/L).
Here, ${\mu}$$_{\mathrm{FE}}$ is the field-effect mobility and C$_{\mathrm{OX}}$ is
the gate dielectric capacitance per unit area. Fig. 2 demonstrates that the transfer curve shifted in the positive direction and g$_{\mathrm{m}}$
(and ${\mu}$$_{\mathrm{FE}}$) increased with increasing stress time in both TFTs.
In addition, the degree of transfer curve shift and ${\Delta}$g$_{\mathrm{m}}$ (and
${\Delta}$${\mu}$$_{\mathrm{FE}}$) were larger in the TFT with W/L = 50/5~${\mu}$m.
Fig. 3(a) and (b) display the time dependencies of the transfer curves in the saturation region
(V$_{\mathrm{DS}}$ = 15 V) measured from the IGZO TFT with W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m under
SHS in the forward and reverse modes, respectively, while Fig. 3(c) and (d) respectively display the dependencies of the IGZO TFT with W/L = 50/5 ${\mu}$m.
Here, the definitions of source and drain are the same as in the stress condition
in the forward mode, although the source and drain are interchanged in the reverse
mode. The experimental results in Fig. 3 suggest that the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ values were larger in the TFT with W/L
= 50/5 ${\mu}$m both operation modes, where V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ is defined in this study
as the value of V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$ inducing a drain current (I$_{D}$) of W/L ${\times}$
10 nA. Fig. 3 also indicates that ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ extracted from the forward mode characterization
was larger than that extracted from the reverse mode characterization in both TFT
dimensions.
This result demonstrates that the local V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ exhibited different values
after SHS in both TFTs.
Fig. 4(a) and (b) display the small signal C$_{GS}$-V$_{GS}$ and C$_{\mathrm{GD}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$
curves measured at a frequency of 50 kHz from the IGZO TFT with W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m
before and after SHS was applied for 2100 s, respectively, while Fig. 4(c) and (d) respectively display the same curves for the TFT with W/L = 50/5 ${\mu}$m.
Here, C$_{\mathrm{GS}}$ and C$_{\mathrm{GD}}$ represent the gate-to-source and gate-to-drain
capacitance obtained with a floating drain and source electrode, respectively. The
experimental results in Fig. 4 indicate that the capacitance-voltage (C-V) curves shifted in the positive direction
and stretched out after SHS in both TFTs. However, it should be stated that these
phenomena were more significant in the TFT with W/L = 50/5 ${\mu}$m. Fig. 4 also demonstrates that the degree the curve stretched out after SHS was more significant
in the C$_{\mathrm{GD}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$ curve than in the C$_{\mathrm{GD}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$
curve in both TFTs.
The experimental results in Fig. 2-4 clearly demonstrate that the degradation in electrical performance of the fabricated
TG-SA coplanar IGZO TFT under SHS was more significant in the TFT with the wider channel
width. This result is consistent with the results from previous studies and has been
attributed to enhanced self-heating effects [13,14]. From Fig. 2-4, it is also evident that the electrical performance of the TFTs was nonuniformly
degraded along the channel length direction. This implies it is necessary to investigate
the quantitative contribution of every degradation mechanism that causes SHS-induced
${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ in the source and drain sides.
The stretched out of the C-V curve observed after SHS in the fabricated IGZO TFT in
Fig. 4 indicates that the subgap DOS increased after SHS. Therefore, to conduct a quantitative
analysis of SHS-induced electrical performance degradation in IGZO TFTs with different
channel widths, we first extracted the subgap DOS from both IGZO TFTs before and after
SHS near the source and drain sides, respectively. The subgap DOS was extracted using
the optical charge pumping method [15,16], where the C$_{\mathrm{GS}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$ and C$_{\mathrm{GD}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$
curves were used to extract the subgap DOS near the source and drain sides of the
IGZO TFTs, respectively. The C-V curves were measured using an LCR meter (HP4284A)
with a 50 kHz ac signal. Here, we used a 3-mW illumination source with a wavelength
corresponding to a photonic energy of 2.4 eV. Furthermore, we obtained the energy
distribution of the subgap DOS profile from the V$_{GS}$-dependent capacitance data
[17,18]. Fig. 5(a) displays the energy distribution of the subgap DOS extracted from both IGZO TFTs
near the source side before and after applying SHS for 2100 s, while Fig. 5(b) displays the distribution near the drain side of the devices. The extracted subgap
DOS (g(E)) was divided into four components according to their distribution shapes
in energy level: the densities of acceptor-like tail states (g$_{\mathrm{TA}}$), acceptor-like
deep states (g$_{\mathrm{DA}}$), shallow donor states (g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$), and oxygen-related
defect states (g$_{\mathrm{O}}$) in the energy gaps of the IGZO TFTs. We modeled the
extracted subgap DOS near E$_{C}$ as follows:
which is denoted by the lines in Fig. 5. In Eqn. (1), E is the electron energy, N$_{\mathrm{TA}}$ is the density of trap states extrapolated
to E$_{C}$, kT$_{\mathrm{TA}}$ is the characteristic energy of the acceptor-like states,
k is the Boltzmann constant, N$_{\mathrm{DA}}$/N$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ /N$_{\mathrm{O}}$
are the Gaussian acceptor-like/donor-like/oxygen-related state densities, E$_{\mathrm{DA}}$/E$_{\mathrm{SD}}$/E$_{\mathrm{O}}$
are the Gaussian mean energies, kT$_{\mathrm{DA}}$/kT$_{\mathrm{SD}}$/kT$_{\mathrm{O}}$
are the Gaussian deviations, and E$_{C}$ is the conduction band minimum. Here, the
oxygen-related defect states imply the oxygen vacancies or excess oxygen-related subgap
states [19-22].
Table 1 presents the subgap DOS parameters extracted from both IGZO TFTs near the source
and drain electrodes before and after SHS. From Fig. 5 and Table 1, it is evident that g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ increased after SHS in both devices, although
the increase was more significant in the TFT with the wider channel width, especially
near the drain side. This increase in the g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ after SHS could be attributed
to hydrogen diffusion from the source/drain IGZO metallization region (n$^{+}$-IGZO
region) to the IGZO channel region. Hydrogen becomes a shallow donor, generating free
electrons in ZnO-based oxide semiconductors [23,24]. Therefore, it increases g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ and facilitates the formation of a percolation
conduction path in the IGZO. Moreover, because the channel temperature increases with
an increase in channel width (due to enhanced self-heating effects), hydrogen diffusion
accelerates more with increased channel width. The higher concentration of the hydrogen
within the channel caused higher g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ and gm (and ${\mu}$$_{\mathrm{FE}}$)
after SHS in the IGZO TFT with the wider channel width, as observed in Fig. 5 and 2, respectively. The larger increase in the g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ near the drain
side of the TFT after SHS could be attributed to the higher channel temperature during
SHS near the drain side of the TFT. This originated from the lower electron concentration
and higher channel resistivity causing a higher level of Joule heating during SHS.
Fig. 5 and Table 1 also demonstrate that g$_{\mathrm{DA}}$ only increased after SHS in the TFT with
the wider channel width (W/L = 50/5 ${\mu}$m), which could be ascribed to the generation
of an M-OH bond facilitated by the higher channel temperature [25-27]. The experimental results in Fig. 5 and Table 1 clearly indicate that the channel width strongly affected the local generation of
subgap states under SHS in IGZO TFTs.
Electron trapping in the gate dielectric is another phenomenon that was enhanced by
the self-heating effects under SHS. In this study, we used the subgap DOS-based ${\Delta}$V$_{TH}$
decomposition technique [23, 28, 29] to extract the electron trapping-induced ${\Delta}$V$_{TH}$
from both IGZO TFTs after SHS near the source and drain sides. From the experimental
results in Fig. 5, we assumed that the physical mechanisms responsible for ${\Delta}$V$_{TH}$ under
SHS in the fabricated IGZO TFTs were increased g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ and g$_{\mathrm{DA}}$
in the IGZO active region and electron trapping in the fast and slow traps in the
SiO$_{\mathrm{X}}$ gate dielectric. Here, the fast/slow trap implies the electronic
trap state in the gate dielectric located relatively close to/far from the interface
with a lower/higher energy barrier for detrapping.
Fig. 6(a) illustrates the decomposition scheme of ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ into the contributions
of each mechanism, where t$_{\mathrm{STR}}$ and t$_{\mathrm{REC}}$ are the stress
and the subsequent recovery time during an application of the subgap DOS-based ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$
decomposition technique, respectively. Here, ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ SD}}$ and
${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ DA}}$ are the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ values caused
by increases in g$_{\mathrm{SD}}$ and g$_{\mathrm{DA}}$, respectively, and ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH
\_ FAST}}$ and ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ SLOW}}$ are the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$
values caused by electron trapping into the fast and slow traps, respectively. As
reported, the donor-like state becomes positively charged if the Fermi level is below
it and is neutral when the trap is occupied (i.e., the Fermi level is above). However,
the acceptor-like state is neutral if the Fermi level is below it and is negatively
charged when the trap is occupied (i.e., the Fermi level is above) [30]. Therefore, ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH\_ SD}}$/${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ DA}}$ adopt
negative/positive values in this study and can be calculated as
Here, q is the elementary charge of an electron, t$_{\mathrm{IGZO}}$ is the active
layer thickness, and E$_{\mathrm{F}}$ is the Fermi level at the flat-band condition.
Fig. 6(b) and (c) display the SHS-induced ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ SD}}$ and ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH
\_ DA}}$ values extracted near the source and drain sides from IGZO TFTs with W/L
= 30/5~${\mu}$m and 50/5 ${\mu}$m, respectively. In Fig. 6(a), V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ recovery after termination of SHS was mainly due to electron-detrapping
from the fast trap in the gate dielectric. Therefore, ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_
FAST}}$ could be obtained directly by using the subgap DOS-based ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$
decomposition technique schematically illustrated in Fig. 6. Then, ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ SLOW}}$ is calculated using
where ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ TOTAL}}$ is the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ value
measured from the time dependence of the transfer curve under SHS at a specific stress
time.
Fig. 7(a) and (b) display the time evolution of ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ during SHS and
recovery phases extracted in the forward and reverse operation modes from the IGZO
TFTs with W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m and 50/5 ${\mu}$m, respectively. Figs. 7(c) and (d)
summarize the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ values originating from each degradation
mechanism after the application of SHS for 2100 s extracted near the source and drain
sides of the IGZO TFTs with W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m and 50/5 ${\mu}$m, respectively. Figs.
7(c) and (d) indicate that the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ values from every degradation
mechanism increased as the channel width increased. However, the increase in the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH
\_ SLOW}}$ was the dominant reason for the more significant electrical performance
degradation of the IGZO TFT with a wider channel width. Given that the higher channel
temperature in the TFT with a wider channel width was caused by enhanced Joule heating
effects, this is consistent with the experimental results in the previous study, where
trapped electrons transferred more easily to deeper positions within the gate dielectric
by Poole-Frenkel conduction with an increase in temperature [31,32]. Figs. 7(c) and (d) also demonstrate that ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ TOTAL}}$, ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH
\_ SLOW}}$, and ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ FAST}}$ exhibited higher values near the
source side of the TFT. This could be attributed to the higher vertical electric fields
under SHS near the source side, even though the channel temperature was higher near
the drain side during SHS.
Table 1. Subgap DOS parameters extracted from IGZO TFTs with both dimensions (W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m and 50/5 ${\mu}$m) near the source and drain electrodes before and after SHS
|
Before stress
|
After stress
(W = 30 μm)
|
After stress
(W = 50 μm)
|
Electrode
|
Source
|
Drain
|
Source
|
Drain
|
Source
|
Drain
|
NTA [cm-3eV-1]
|
1.3 × 1017
|
1.3 × 1017
|
1.0 × 1017
|
1.3 × 1017
|
1.3 × 1017
|
1.3 × 1017
|
kTTA [eV]
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
0.03
|
NDA [cm-3eV-1]
|
5.0 × 1014
|
5.0 × 1014
|
5.0 ×1014
|
5.0 × 1014
|
1.0 × 1015
|
1.0 ×1015
|
kTDA [eV]
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
0.73
|
EDA [eV]
|
−0.9
|
−0.9
|
−0.9
|
−0.9
|
−0.9
|
−0.9
|
NSD [cm-3eV-1]
|
1.7 × 1016
|
1.7 × 1016
|
2.3 × 1016
|
2.5 × 1016
|
2.6 × 1016
|
2.9 × 1016
|
kTSD [eV]
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.2
|
0.20
|
0.2
|
0.20
|
ESD [eV]
|
−0.23
|
−0.27
|
−0.23
|
−0.27
|
−0.23
|
−0.27
|
NO [cm−3eV−1]
|
1.9 × 1014
|
3.50 × 1014
|
1.9 × 1014
|
3.50 × 1014
|
1.9 × 1014
|
3.50 × 1014
|
kTO [eV]
|
0.78
|
0.78
|
0.78
|
0.78
|
0.78
|
0.78
|
EO [eV]
|
−2.0
|
−2.0
|
−2.0
|
−2.0
|
−2.0
|
−2.0
|
Fig. 2. Time dependence of transfer curves measured at V$_{\mathrm{DS}}$ = 0.1 V under SHS from IGZO TFTs with (a) $W/L = 30/5$ ${\mu}$m; (b) 50/5 ${\mu}$m. Time dependence of the transconductance (g$_{\mathrm{m}}$ = ${\mu}$$_{\mathrm{FE}}$${\cdot}$$_{\mathrm{OX}}$${\cdot}$V$_{\mathrm{DS}}$${\cdot}$W/L) measured at V$_{DS}$ = 0.1 V under SHS from IGZO TFTs with (c) W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m; (d) 50/5 ${\mu}$m.
Fig. 3. Time dependence of transfer curves in the saturation region (V$_{\mathrm{DS}}$ = 15 V) measured from the IGZO TFT with W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m in the (a) forward; (b) reverse modes under SHS. Time dependence of transfer curves in the saturation region (V$_{\mathrm{DS}}$ = 15 V) measured from the IGZO TFT with W/L = 50/5~${\mu}$m in the (c) forward; (d) reverse modes under SHS.
Fig. 4. Small signal: (a) C$_{\mathrm{GS}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$; (b) C$_{\mathrm{GD}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$ curves measured at a frequency of 50 kHz from the IGZO TFT with W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m before and after application of SHS for 2100 s. Small signal; (c) C$_{\mathrm{GS}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$; (d) C$_{\mathrm{GD}}$-V$_{\mathrm{GS}}$ curves measured at a frequency of 50 kHz from the IGZO TFT with W/L = 50/5 ${\mu}$m before and after application of SHS for 2100 s.
Fig. 5. Energy distribution of the subgap DOS extracted from IGZO TFTs with W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m and 50/5 ${\mu}$m near the (a) source; (b) drain sides of the IGZO TFT before and after application of SHS for 2100 s.
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic illustration of the ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ decomposition scheme based on the subgap DOS-based ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ decomposition technique. The ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ SD}}$ and ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH \_ DA}}$ values were extracted near the source and drain sides after applying SHS for 2100 s from IGZO TFTs with (b) W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m; (c) 50/5 ${\mu}$m.
Fig. 7. Time evolution of ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ during SHS and recovery phases extracted during forward and reverse mode operation from IGZO TFTs with (a) W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m; (b) 50/5 ${\mu}$m. The ${\Delta}$V$_{\mathrm{TH}}$ values originated from each degradation mechanism after applying SHS for 2100 s extracted near the source and drain sides from IGZO TFTs with (a) W/L = 30/5 ${\mu}$m; (b) 50/5~${\mu}$m.