LeeByung-Seok
KooYong-Seo
-
(jukjeon yongin 448701, Korea)
Copyright © The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers(IEIE)
Index Terms
ESD, electrostatic discharge, trigger voltage, holding voltage, SCR
I. INTRODUCTION
The damage caused by an electrostatic discharge (ESD) in an integrated circuit (IC)
has become a more serious problem as advances in semiconductor process technology
have led to the continuing miniaturization of IC. The increase in demand for high
voltage analog and smart power IC technology requires for improvement in the design
of ESD protection circuit (1,2). Such ICs can be used for a variety of applications, including for power management,
display driver, and automotive applications. As a result, it is necessary to design
a reliable ESD protection circuit.
In the smart poser technology, MOSFET and silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) are commonly
used as an on-chip ESD protection circuit. MOSFET is not suitable for ESD protection
due to their low robustness and large size. On the other hand, SCR can drive a high
current and provide robust protection against ESD because a discharge path is formed
inside the silicon substrate. However, it has a low holding voltage of about 2 V,
which is the turn-on voltage of the parasitic NPN/PNP bipolar transistor. The ESD
protection circuit may be triggered by unwanted noise and overshoot voltage, causing
a latch-up problem during normal operation due to its low holding voltage. A latch-up
results in a malfunction during normal operation and causes destruction of the IC
due to the presence of a high current (3).
In this paper, a novel SCR-based ESD protection circuit is proposed for 5 V supply
voltage application which has low trigger voltage and high holding voltage compared
with conventional SCR. The proposed ESD protection circuit was fabricated by 0.18
µm BCD process and verified electrical characteristics through the measurement of
TLP (6).
II. PROPOSED SCR BASED ESD PROTECTION CIRCUIT
Structural features of the proposed ESD protection circuit are as follows. N + diffusion
region of the junction between the left N-well and P-well is made to be the role of
the drain of Grounded-Gate N-Channel MOS (GGNMOS), N + diffusion region to the source
role of the GGNMOS and the Gate that has been inserted into the P-well, and P+ drift
region as P-body connected to the cathode to form a GGNMOS operation. So, parasitic
NPN bipolar transistor Q1 is further operative. Fig. 1 shows the cross-section of the proposed ESD protection circuit and conventional ESD
protection circuit. And Fig. 2 shows the equivalent circuit of the proposed ESD protection circuit.
Fig. 1. (a) Cross-section of the conventional ESD protection circuit, (b) Cross-section
of the proposed ESD protection circuit.
Fig. 2. (a) The equivalent circuit of the proposed ESD protection circuit.
The behavior of the proposed ESD protection circuit is as follows. When ESD surge
is applied to anode, junction between N+ diffusion and P-well is reverse biased until
it goes into avalanche breakdown. Electron-Hole Pair (EHP) is created by avalanche
breakdown. The current of created Holes moves to P-well area and increase potential
of P-well. When the potential between the P-well and N+ cathode of GGNMOS reaches
about 0.7 V, the junction is forward-biased and parasitic NPN bipolar transistor (Q1)
turn on. Then, parasitic PNP bipolar transistor (Q2) of SCR is turned on. When the
current of PNP bipolar transistor (Q2) flow to P-well, its current generates a voltage
drop a cross P-well and turns on the parasitic NPN bipolar transistor (Q3). At this
point, parasitic PNP bipolar transistor and NPN bipolar transistor discharge ESD currents
as positive feedback through the Cathode. In order to analyze the holding voltage
of the proposed ESD protection circuit, the design parameter D1, D2 were set. D1 is
the length of Gate of GGNMOS, it is control P-well length, which means the base region
of the parasitic NPN bipolar transistor. D2 is the length of the N+ floating region
and is related to the holding voltage.
III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
1. TLP and Leakage Measurement
Transmission Line Pulse (TLP) measurement method is most widely used method to analyze
electrical characteristics and robustness characteristics for ESD protection circuit.
The TLP produces a rectangular pulse with a rising time of 10 ns and a pulse width
of 100 ns (4). In this paper, HBM and MM tests were conducted according to ESD standard (9). The proposed ESD protection circuit was fabricated by using a 0.18 µm BCD process.
The trigger voltage (VT) is the voltage at which the ESD protector turns ON. The trigger
voltage should be less than the voltage at which the generic elements used in the
internal circuit break down and the gate oxide breakdown voltage. The holding voltage
(VH) is the minimum voltage across the device during ESD current discharge when it
is turned on after the ESD protector is triggered.
The holding voltage must be greater than the operating voltage of the internal circuit.
The secondary trigger voltage and trigger current refer to the current and voltage
at the time the ESD protector is destroyed. It is known that the secondary trigger
current is mainly used as an index of the ESD protection device's durability characteristics,
and the value can be converted into HBM, MM, and the like.
Fig. 3 shows the TLP I-V curve of the conventional SCR and Proposed ESD protection circuit.
The trigger voltage of the proposed ESD protection circuit is 10.58 V and it has a
lower voltage than 11 V for the SCR. The reason for the low trigger voltage is that
avalanche breakdown occurs at N+ bridge/P-well junction as N+ bridge is high doping.
As holding voltage is 3.98 V, it is higher than the conventional SCR.
Fig. 3. (a) Fabricated chips, (b) TLP I-V curve of conventional SCR and the proposed
ESD protection circuit.
Design parameter D1 is Gate length of GGNMOS. The gate length is the base region parasitic
NPN bipolar transistor (Q1, Q3), and controls P-well length. As the gate length increase,
the base width of the NPN bipolar transistor increases. As the base width increase,
the current gain of the NPN bipolar transistor decreases because the emitter injection
efficiency decrease. So, the holding voltage increases and was measured at 3.41 V,
3.93 V, 4.36 V, and 5.65 V for D1 values of 1 µm, 2 µm, 3 µm and 4 µm. Fig. 4(a) shows the TLP I-V curve as D1 varies. And second design parameter D2 is that N+ floating
diffusion region inserted in the N-well. The more the design variable D2 increases,
the holding voltage increased up to 4.21 V 6.09 V, and 7.24 V, respectively, as current
gain decreases with the increases in the PNP bipolar base width. Table 1 shows the results of the measurements for holding voltage and second breakdown current.
Fig. 4. Measured design parameter TLP I-V characteristics (a) D1, (b) D2.
Table 1. TLP characteristics of the proposed ESD protection circuit resulting from
the D1, D2 design parameters
Design Parameter
|
Electrical Characteristics
|
|
VT[V]
|
VH[V]
|
IT2[V]
|
Conventional SCR
|
21.88
|
3.6
|
6.3
|
Optimized Circuit
|
10.11
|
7.24
|
5.36
|
D1 [µm]
|
VT[V]
|
VH[V]
|
IT2[V]
|
1
|
9.53
|
3.41
|
6.89
|
2
|
10.29
|
3.93
|
6.8
|
3
|
10.44
|
4.36
|
6.88
|
4
|
10.39
|
5.65
|
6.95
|
D2 [µm]
|
VT[V]
|
VH[V]
|
IT2[V]
|
0
|
9.53
|
3.41
|
6.89
|
3
|
9.4
|
4.21
|
5.61
|
6
|
9.4
|
6.09
|
5.52
|
9
|
9.4
|
7.24
|
5.36
|
2. Robustness Characteristics of the Proposed Circuit
I-V characteristics of the proposed ESD protection circuit were confirmed through
TLP measurement. It2 (Second Breakdown current) from TLP measurement is known to be
possible in terms of the HBM and MM value, but there are deviation because of the
environmental constraints of the system. Therefore, HBM and MM measurements from reproduced
real-world ESD current should be involved with TLP measurement (5). HBM and MM current obtained from the ESD simulator is injected into the ESD protection
circuit on Probe Station. After that, damages of the ESD protection circuit, leakage
current and trigger voltage are investigated by Curve Tracer 370. ESD protection circuits
with basic design variables have fault-tolerance characteristics of HBM 6 kV and MM
550 V (7,8). Table 2 shows the result of the fault-tolerances of the proposed circuit for each design
variable.
Table 2. Robustness of the proposed ESD protection circuit
Design Parameter
|
HBM [kV]
|
MM [V]
|
Proposed Circuit
|
6
|
550
|
D1 [µm]
|
1
|
6
|
550
|
2
|
6
|
550
|
3
|
6
|
550
|
4
|
6
|
550
|
D2 [µm]
|
0
|
6
|
450
|
3
|
6
|
450
|
6
|
6
|
450
|
9
|
6
|
450
|
IV. CONCLUSION
In this paper, a new SCR-based structural ESD protection circuit is proposed with
low trigger voltage and high robustness characteristic for a 5 V application. The
proposed structure is developed to reduce the avalanche breakdown voltage of the Conventional
SCR. Also, due to the parasitic NPN bipolar transistor operates within GGNMOS discharge
path the ESD current through the three parasitic transistors. Moreover, the results
corresponding to each of the design variables verified the performance of the proposed
circuit. Through TLP measurement, the Trigger voltage of the measurement result of
the fabricated chips in the proposed device is 10.58 V, the holding voltage is 7.24
V. Thus, the proposed ESD protection circuit has a low trigger voltage and a high
holding voltage characteristic having latch-up immunity. And the reliability of the
low voltage application integrated circuits.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The present research was conducted with the support of the research fund of Dankook
University in 2018.
REFERENCES
Koo Yong-Seo, Lee Kwang-Yeob, Kim Kui-Dong, Kwon Jong-ki, 2009, Design of SCR-based
ESD Protection Device for Power Clamp using Deep-Submicron CMOS Technology, Micronics
Journal, Vol. 40
Ker M. D., Yen C. C., 2008, Investigation and Design of on-chip Power-Rail ESD Clamp
Circuits without Suffering Latch up-Like Failure during System-Level ESD Test, IEEE
J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 43
Koo Yong-Seo, Lee Kwang-Yeob, Kim Kui-Dong, Kwon Jong-Ki, 2008, The design of high
holding voltage SCR for whole-chip ESD protection, IEICE Electron. Express, Vol. 5
Wang AZ, H., 2001, An On-Chip ESD Protection Circuit with Low Trigger Voltage in BiCMOS
Technology, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, Vol. 36
Semenov Oleg, Sarbishaei Hossein, Sachdev Manoj, 2008, ESD Protection Device and Circuit
Design for Advanced CMOS Technologies, (Springer. Waterloo. 2008) 53.
Barth Jon E., Verhaege Koen, Henry Leo G., Richner John, 2001, TLP Calibration, Correlation,
Standards, and New Techniques, IEEE Trans. on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing,
Vol. 24
Ground E., Hernandez M., 2007, Obtaining TLP-like Information from an HBM Simulator,
29th Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symp, 2A.3-1
Ground Evan, Hernandez Marcos, 2007, Obtaining TLP-like information from an HBM simulator,
Proc. 29th EOS/ESD Symposium, 2A.3-1
Photiwara Wannita, Silapunt Rardchawadee, 2014, Analysis of Electrostatic Discharges
Events in TMR and HGA Levels, TENCON 2014 – 2014 IEEE Region 10 Conference
Author
Byung-Seok Lee was born in Seoul, Republic of Korea, in 1983. He received his B.S.
in Electronics Engineering from Seokyeong Uni-versity, in 2010. M.S. in Electronics
and Electrical Engineering from Dankook University, in 2012. He was PhD.-course since
2012 in Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dankook University. His current research
interests include semiconductor devices, such as power BJTs, LDMOSs, and IGBTs; and
electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection circuit design.
Yong-Seo Koo was born in Seoul, Republic of Korea, in 1957. He received his B.S.,
M.S. and Ph.D. in Electronic Engineering from Sogang University, Seoul, Republic of
Korea, in 1981, 1983 and 1992, respectively. He joined the Department of Electronics
and Electrical Engineering, Dankook University as a Professor, in 2009. His current
research interests include semiconductor devices, such as power BJTs, LDMOSs, and
IGBTs; high-efficiency power management integrated circuits (PMICs), such as DC-DC
converters; and electrostatic discharge (ESD) protection circuit design.